Denying sea-level rise: How 100 centimeters divided the state of North Carolina | EARTH Magazine
By “empirical understanding” he means “extorting money from the public by means of junk science”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
Steven,
Children just wont know what subsidence is…
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/40/E781.full
Global modeling of glacial isostasy (3) gives a rate of subsidence of approximately 1.3 mm/y. Direct GPS measurements indicate an even higher rate of subsidence of the regional proglacial forebulge (2). Finally, local tide gauge records have a 20th century rate of sea level rise of close to 4 mm/y (2), or approximately 2 mm/y higher than the global mean rate of sea level rise. To summarize, all these alternative estimates point to a substantially greater rate of subsidence than the 1 mm/y geologic estimate.
Claiming you can predict dramatic sea level rise by reference to a computer model you’ve just made up is usually called the “semi-empirical” approach – at least in the junk science sea level rise papers I’ve read.
It has been proven that it is impossible to write bad software.
Bad software? I didn’t know there was such a thing…
Thin Ice
http://thiniceclimate.org/
The puff piece on Earth magazine is riddled with errors and misstatements from top to bottom.
The title sets the stage: “Denying Sea Level Rise”. The fact is that no one in NC is denying SLR. The issue is whether there will be linear or accelerated SLR — but that is not what the title says.
I filed a complaint with the magazine’s editors. We’ll see what they do.
I’m astounded the warmists themselves presented that graph . How the hell do you extrapolate an exponential out of the short piece of noise they sketch . A linear extrapolation sucks about all the information there is out of it .
Congratulations to John Droz for being largely responsible for this success .
I think more people should write letters to the offending publications.
Remind them that debasing their integrity by publishing half truths and misleading nonsense will eventually have a cost.