Denying sea-level rise: How 100 centimeters divided the state of North Carolina | EARTH Magazine
By “empirical understanding” he means “extorting money from the public by means of junk science”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
Steven,
Children just wont know what subsidence is…
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/40/E781.full
Global modeling of glacial isostasy (3) gives a rate of subsidence of approximately 1.3 mm/y. Direct GPS measurements indicate an even higher rate of subsidence of the regional proglacial forebulge (2). Finally, local tide gauge records have a 20th century rate of sea level rise of close to 4 mm/y (2), or approximately 2 mm/y higher than the global mean rate of sea level rise. To summarize, all these alternative estimates point to a substantially greater rate of subsidence than the 1 mm/y geologic estimate.
Claiming you can predict dramatic sea level rise by reference to a computer model you’ve just made up is usually called the “semi-empirical” approach – at least in the junk science sea level rise papers I’ve read.
It has been proven that it is impossible to write bad software.
Bad software? I didn’t know there was such a thing…
Thin Ice
http://thiniceclimate.org/
The puff piece on Earth magazine is riddled with errors and misstatements from top to bottom.
The title sets the stage: “Denying Sea Level Rise”. The fact is that no one in NC is denying SLR. The issue is whether there will be linear or accelerated SLR — but that is not what the title says.
I filed a complaint with the magazine’s editors. We’ll see what they do.
I’m astounded the warmists themselves presented that graph . How the hell do you extrapolate an exponential out of the short piece of noise they sketch . A linear extrapolation sucks about all the information there is out of it .
Congratulations to John Droz for being largely responsible for this success .
I think more people should write letters to the offending publications.
Remind them that debasing their integrity by publishing half truths and misleading nonsense will eventually have a cost.