Romney Regrets ’47 Percent’ Remark
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
He regrets that the media used it against him.
…it is more telling of you than of Romney, that you chose to ignore Steven’s point, which is that there was and is truth in the “47%” remark, after all.
Odd, I didn’t comment on whether Romney was right or wrong, only the media’s reaction.
No. You said that Romney regretted the fact that the media used it against him. The meaning of your words is contained in the full context of YOUR words. I suggest either mean what you say or say what you mean. Pretending that you said something other than what you did say is simply not honest and an insult to your readers. They can read and see the clear meaning of your words. Yet, by trying to alter the clear meaning of your words without changing your words, you are saying that they can’t.
Once again, Romney was right.