Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
“Romney Regrets ’47 Percent’ Remark”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
He regrets that the media used it against him.
…it is more telling of you than of Romney, that you chose to ignore Steven’s point, which is that there was and is truth in the “47%” remark, after all.
Odd, I didn’t comment on whether Romney was right or wrong, only the media’s reaction.
No. You said that Romney regretted the fact that the media used it against him. The meaning of your words is contained in the full context of YOUR words. I suggest either mean what you say or say what you mean. Pretending that you said something other than what you did say is simply not honest and an insult to your readers. They can read and see the clear meaning of your words. Yet, by trying to alter the clear meaning of your words without changing your words, you are saying that they can’t.
Once again, Romney was right.