Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- scott allen on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
“Romney Regrets ’47 Percent’ Remark”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
He regrets that the media used it against him.
…it is more telling of you than of Romney, that you chose to ignore Steven’s point, which is that there was and is truth in the “47%” remark, after all.
Odd, I didn’t comment on whether Romney was right or wrong, only the media’s reaction.
No. You said that Romney regretted the fact that the media used it against him. The meaning of your words is contained in the full context of YOUR words. I suggest either mean what you say or say what you mean. Pretending that you said something other than what you did say is simply not honest and an insult to your readers. They can read and see the clear meaning of your words. Yet, by trying to alter the clear meaning of your words without changing your words, you are saying that they can’t.
Once again, Romney was right.