Caution : This graph is too complicated for climate alarmists.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
Recent Comments
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
- conrad ziefle on UK Net Zero
- czechlist on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
Reblogged this on The Firewall.
Way to many lines and to many colors. Multiple choice is not their strong point!
I had a work colleague I used to hang out with who was a perfect example of why this works. He and his wife were flaky. I’d be over there and they’d be using baby seal paint (I’m making up products) to paint the house, and I’d say why not use whale blubber paint (made up again) since it works better and is cheaper? Then I’d hear how collecting the whales was destroying the habitat of the 3 toed, cold weather gecko.
The next time I’d go over there, and they’d be using the whale blubber paint and I’d say aren’t you boycotting that? And they’d have some reason, although many times it was clear they just plain forgot that they had been boycotting.
It was a never ending stream of the crisis of the moment. Once he literally was trying to tell me about some crisis and forgot what it was and asked his wife, “What was that we were boycotting this week?” He didn’t mean this week since they were always serious about what they were boycotting, but it probably was a week until they changed their mind.
Our alarmist friends tell us that no tornadoes is weird. We need for them to tell us what number of tornadoes is the correct number.
ANY number of tornadoes that is at least ZERO in a given time period is a sign of DANGEROUS CLIMATE CHANGE.
Happy?
RTF