almost all my colleagues agree we are entering a cold phase
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Steven … this is off topic for this post; but I’m a professional statistician, and I can’t take this abuse any more. I’m going to become activist and denounce the unscientific approach that these IPCC “scientists” take. They have turned the scientific method on it’s head, and that’s why so many outside scientists and engineers have signed petitions objecting to what they’ve seen when they pull back the curtains of their charade (Burt Rutan, eg.) . I know from experience in my industry (pharmaceutical) that the integrity of the data/basis is central to decision of rational interpretation. Any “adjustment” is viewed as suspect.
I believe I’m going to become activist. I have skill and knowledge, and aim to fire this to demand the scientific method be adhered to. Please channel me in a productive direction/connection.
[email protected]
I suggest starting here. Bill Briggs is a statistician and skeptic.
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/
How many administrative bodies of scientific institutions have endorsed the IPCC consensus? All of them. How many have surveyed their memberships to find out what they think? None of them.
It’s a good thing we pumped all that CO2 into the atmosphere to prevent this.
… pity it didn’t do anything. 🙁