almost all my colleagues agree we are entering a cold phase
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
- Low Cost Renewable Energy
- The End Of Scottish Skiing
- Collapse Of The Gulf Stream
- “it’s occurring exactly the way we said it would.”
- “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
Recent Comments
- Thomas Robbins on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Thomas Robbins on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Peter Carroll on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Jack the Insider on Green Energy Progress
- Russell Cook on A Toast To President Trump
- Denis Rushworth on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- czechlist on A Toast To President Trump
- D. Boss on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- D. Boss on Green Energy Progress
- arn on A Toast To President Trump
Steven … this is off topic for this post; but I’m a professional statistician, and I can’t take this abuse any more. I’m going to become activist and denounce the unscientific approach that these IPCC “scientists” take. They have turned the scientific method on it’s head, and that’s why so many outside scientists and engineers have signed petitions objecting to what they’ve seen when they pull back the curtains of their charade (Burt Rutan, eg.) . I know from experience in my industry (pharmaceutical) that the integrity of the data/basis is central to decision of rational interpretation. Any “adjustment” is viewed as suspect.
I believe I’m going to become activist. I have skill and knowledge, and aim to fire this to demand the scientific method be adhered to. Please channel me in a productive direction/connection.
[email protected]
I suggest starting here. Bill Briggs is a statistician and skeptic.
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/
How many administrative bodies of scientific institutions have endorsed the IPCC consensus? All of them. How many have surveyed their memberships to find out what they think? None of them.
It’s a good thing we pumped all that CO2 into the atmosphere to prevent this.
… pity it didn’t do anything. 🙁