almost all my colleagues agree we are entering a cold phase
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Hank Phillips on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
Steven … this is off topic for this post; but I’m a professional statistician, and I can’t take this abuse any more. I’m going to become activist and denounce the unscientific approach that these IPCC “scientists” take. They have turned the scientific method on it’s head, and that’s why so many outside scientists and engineers have signed petitions objecting to what they’ve seen when they pull back the curtains of their charade (Burt Rutan, eg.) . I know from experience in my industry (pharmaceutical) that the integrity of the data/basis is central to decision of rational interpretation. Any “adjustment” is viewed as suspect.
I believe I’m going to become activist. I have skill and knowledge, and aim to fire this to demand the scientific method be adhered to. Please channel me in a productive direction/connection.
[email protected]
I suggest starting here. Bill Briggs is a statistician and skeptic.
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/
How many administrative bodies of scientific institutions have endorsed the IPCC consensus? All of them. How many have surveyed their memberships to find out what they think? None of them.
It’s a good thing we pumped all that CO2 into the atmosphere to prevent this.
… pity it didn’t do anything. 🙁