almost all my colleagues agree we are entering a cold phase
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
Steven … this is off topic for this post; but I’m a professional statistician, and I can’t take this abuse any more. I’m going to become activist and denounce the unscientific approach that these IPCC “scientists” take. They have turned the scientific method on it’s head, and that’s why so many outside scientists and engineers have signed petitions objecting to what they’ve seen when they pull back the curtains of their charade (Burt Rutan, eg.) . I know from experience in my industry (pharmaceutical) that the integrity of the data/basis is central to decision of rational interpretation. Any “adjustment” is viewed as suspect.
I believe I’m going to become activist. I have skill and knowledge, and aim to fire this to demand the scientific method be adhered to. Please channel me in a productive direction/connection.
[email protected]
I suggest starting here. Bill Briggs is a statistician and skeptic.
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/
How many administrative bodies of scientific institutions have endorsed the IPCC consensus? All of them. How many have surveyed their memberships to find out what they think? None of them.
It’s a good thing we pumped all that CO2 into the atmosphere to prevent this.
… pity it didn’t do anything. 🙁