Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
- Low Cost Renewable Energy
- The End Of Scottish Skiing
- Collapse Of The Gulf Stream
- “it’s occurring exactly the way we said it would.”
- “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
- “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
Recent Comments
- Russell Cook on A Toast To President Trump
- Denis Rushworth on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- czechlist on A Toast To President Trump
- D. Boss on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- D. Boss on Green Energy Progress
- arn on A Toast To President Trump
- dm on Scientists Concerned
- Robertvd on Green Energy Progress
- Robertvd on Green Energy Progress
- arn on Green Energy Progress
Guardian : Big Green More Damaging Than Deniers
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
SLAUGHTER: Wind farms kill 67 eagles in 5 years…
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/11/eagle-slaughter-wind-farms-kill-67-eagles-5-years/
Comrade Naomi just needs to look in the mirror to find another culprit who has damaged the message. She just had a baby, thereby adding 9441 tons of peer-reviewed, toxic carbon to her personal carbon slick.
It is difficult to quantify the level of hypocrisy among these scum.
Steve, have you addressed this? If yes, I guess I missed it, link please. Thanks.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23964372
Yes, Naomi is a wacko. I could not read any more of her answers after about five questions.