Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- czechlist on 100% Wind By 2030
- Jehzsa on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dearieme on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mike Peinsipp on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mac on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- mwhite on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Paul Ehrlich : Now In His Fifth Decade Of Dissonance
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
My favorite is still the huge chunk of ice breaking off in the antarctic causing a huge tsunami of heretofore untold destruction. That was back when the ice age was coming, a few decades ago.
You have to wonder why people who hold extreme views and demand drastic reductions in population to save the Earth are still here !
Whatever happened to “lead by example” or “do as I do not as I say” ?
The world is ‘overpopulated’ yet there is no mass starvation. After 2100 we may be worrying about an aging population worried about enough young people to support them. The challenge for humans won’t be overpopulation but a declining active population. Fertility rates around the world have been falling since the 1960s. But it’s still worse than we thought.
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/global-population-10-billion-not-so-fast
http://geocurrents.info/cultural-geography/television-and-fertility-in-india-response-to-critics
When it’s pointed out how CO2 increases crop production, they come back with, “But the plants are lower in some nutrients.” It’s amazing how they cling on to their doom like a child’s “security blanket”.
Yes, the food grows faster, and provides significantly more bulk and nutrients, but, because the nutrients are not quite as dense, they claim to be dismayed.
Sadly if Paul Erlich came to Australia and said those things today the Sydney Morning Herald would hang on his every word and publish him without questioning a word.