Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
- gordon vigurs on What Me Worry?
- arn on The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- arn on What Me Worry?
- Bob G on The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Bob G on April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- Greg in NZ on More Proof Of Global Warming
- Greg in NZ on Heatwaves Of 1980
- Greg in NZ on What Me Worry?
- Greg in NZ on The CO2 Endangerment Finding
Paul Ehrlich : Now In His Fifth Decade Of Dissonance
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
My favorite is still the huge chunk of ice breaking off in the antarctic causing a huge tsunami of heretofore untold destruction. That was back when the ice age was coming, a few decades ago.
You have to wonder why people who hold extreme views and demand drastic reductions in population to save the Earth are still here !
Whatever happened to “lead by example” or “do as I do not as I say” ?
The world is ‘overpopulated’ yet there is no mass starvation. After 2100 we may be worrying about an aging population worried about enough young people to support them. The challenge for humans won’t be overpopulation but a declining active population. Fertility rates around the world have been falling since the 1960s. But it’s still worse than we thought.
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/global-population-10-billion-not-so-fast
http://geocurrents.info/cultural-geography/television-and-fertility-in-india-response-to-critics
When it’s pointed out how CO2 increases crop production, they come back with, “But the plants are lower in some nutrients.” It’s amazing how they cling on to their doom like a child’s “security blanket”.
Yes, the food grows faster, and provides significantly more bulk and nutrients, but, because the nutrients are not quite as dense, they claim to be dismayed.
Sadly if Paul Erlich came to Australia and said those things today the Sydney Morning Herald would hang on his every word and publish him without questioning a word.