Experts predicted a huge solar cycle.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
So? CO2 controls Earth’s Temperature. Just ask Gavin.
Big decline in sunspots?
Decline! Again!
No worries, they are experts in hiding declines. Hell, they’re so good, they disappeared the entire MWP! Now that takes Mannpower.
Some experts (yes you NASA) predicted a huge cycle. Others may have been closer to the mark:
http://www.leif.org/research/Cycle%2024%20Smallest%20100%20years.pdf
Around the world, warm-mongers are praying that the Sun heats up. (Even although it “has nothing to do with the climate”…)
It’s all Bush’s fault!
Well, NASA may have made a slight typo on their 2009 prediction — uh, projection — uh, “scenario” — but their 2013 forecast is correct without a doubt. Notice that they already have proven themselves spot on with the 2000 to 2012 portion!
đŸ™‚
Looks like they underestimated the unemployment rate and overestimated the sunspot counts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujTTjt5VkZM
…and from the Times of India: “Solar Activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Solar-activity-drops-to-100-year-low-puzzling-scientists/articleshow/22719807.cms
Cycle 25 is going to knock their ‘global warming’ on its rear! These people HARDLY qualify as ‘scientists’ or anything of the sort!!!
http://www.landscheidt.info/
My paper “Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?” is published in the peer reviewed journal (IJAA)
http://www.scirp.org/journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=3540#36513
To be clear the principles in the paper are very different to what Landscheidt laid out, SC24 is exactly on track as predicted first in 2008.
In a few years NOAA will go back and revise the numbers to say what they want them to.