Experts predicted a huge solar cycle.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
So? CO2 controls Earth’s Temperature. Just ask Gavin.
Big decline in sunspots?
Decline! Again!
No worries, they are experts in hiding declines. Hell, they’re so good, they disappeared the entire MWP! Now that takes Mannpower.
Some experts (yes you NASA) predicted a huge cycle. Others may have been closer to the mark:
http://www.leif.org/research/Cycle%2024%20Smallest%20100%20years.pdf
Around the world, warm-mongers are praying that the Sun heats up. (Even although it “has nothing to do with the climate”…)
It’s all Bush’s fault!
Well, NASA may have made a slight typo on their 2009 prediction — uh, projection — uh, “scenario” — but their 2013 forecast is correct without a doubt. Notice that they already have proven themselves spot on with the 2000 to 2012 portion!
🙂
Looks like they underestimated the unemployment rate and overestimated the sunspot counts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujTTjt5VkZM
…and from the Times of India: “Solar Activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Solar-activity-drops-to-100-year-low-puzzling-scientists/articleshow/22719807.cms
Cycle 25 is going to knock their ‘global warming’ on its rear! These people HARDLY qualify as ‘scientists’ or anything of the sort!!!
http://www.landscheidt.info/
My paper “Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?” is published in the peer reviewed journal (IJAA)
http://www.scirp.org/journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=3540#36513
To be clear the principles in the paper are very different to what Landscheidt laid out, SC24 is exactly on track as predicted first in 2008.
In a few years NOAA will go back and revise the numbers to say what they want them to.