Experts predicted a huge solar cycle.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- D. Boss on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- BenV on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Jack the Insider on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- conrad ziefle on New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
So? CO2 controls Earth’s Temperature. Just ask Gavin.
Big decline in sunspots?
Decline! Again!
No worries, they are experts in hiding declines. Hell, they’re so good, they disappeared the entire MWP! Now that takes Mannpower.
Some experts (yes you NASA) predicted a huge cycle. Others may have been closer to the mark:
http://www.leif.org/research/Cycle%2024%20Smallest%20100%20years.pdf
Around the world, warm-mongers are praying that the Sun heats up. (Even although it “has nothing to do with the climate”…)
It’s all Bush’s fault!
Well, NASA may have made a slight typo on their 2009 prediction — uh, projection — uh, “scenario” — but their 2013 forecast is correct without a doubt. Notice that they already have proven themselves spot on with the 2000 to 2012 portion!
🙂
Looks like they underestimated the unemployment rate and overestimated the sunspot counts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujTTjt5VkZM
…and from the Times of India: “Solar Activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Solar-activity-drops-to-100-year-low-puzzling-scientists/articleshow/22719807.cms
Cycle 25 is going to knock their ‘global warming’ on its rear! These people HARDLY qualify as ‘scientists’ or anything of the sort!!!
http://www.landscheidt.info/
My paper “Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?” is published in the peer reviewed journal (IJAA)
http://www.scirp.org/journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=3540#36513
To be clear the principles in the paper are very different to what Landscheidt laid out, SC24 is exactly on track as predicted first in 2008.
In a few years NOAA will go back and revise the numbers to say what they want them to.