Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
So much for the “hot spot”.
This is likely the same result for most equatorial locations affected by marine Trade Winds. I’d expect Caribbean, Northern Brazil, Eastern African, locations to show similar results!
The extra CO2 should mean a positive feedback in Darwin…surely? (: Evaporation should be running amok and wreaking havoc!
Bloody water vapour!
The extra CO2 causes a positive feedback, or a negative feedback, unless it causes no feedback, in which case it causes a negative positive backfeed. At other times, it makes no difference at all.
Steve does a great job bringing up these local temperature record graphs, and all the ones I have seen show no warming over a long time scale. I know it would be a huge exercise but if this could be collated for all temperature stations it would be a more accurate means of identififying if world overall temperatures were really changing. If all these graphs showed no, or negligible, change then how could anyone claim the world average was changing?
To be fair, Perth shows warming while Darwin and Sydney don’t. My opinion is that there is no long term warming other than that caused by UHI.
Isn’t that what the combined Crutem4 global anomaly is?
And HadCRUT4 when you include HadSST3.
Well, there are two ways of looking at it. I got this quote from a recent Michael Mann post:
“This is a long standing problem in climate science. Morgan & Keith (1995, Subjective judgements by climate experts. Environmental Science & Technology 29, 468-476) showed that for some basic questions a very careful way of determining the data constructs can lead to a bimodal evaluation distribution rather than just a unilateral view around a mode value. This then raises questions about the usefulness of a median evaluation construct.” -Michael Mann
In other words, there are two ways of looking at it. What an asshole.
Bringing up Darwin again? Lol.
You’re not going to find much warming in the tropics because there hasn’t been.