Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Diversity Is Our Strength
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on Diversity Is Our Strength
- GeologyJim on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Bill Odom on “a persistent concern”
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
So much for the “hot spot”.
This is likely the same result for most equatorial locations affected by marine Trade Winds. I’d expect Caribbean, Northern Brazil, Eastern African, locations to show similar results!
The extra CO2 should mean a positive feedback in Darwin…surely? (: Evaporation should be running amok and wreaking havoc!
Bloody water vapour!
The extra CO2 causes a positive feedback, or a negative feedback, unless it causes no feedback, in which case it causes a negative positive backfeed. At other times, it makes no difference at all.
Steve does a great job bringing up these local temperature record graphs, and all the ones I have seen show no warming over a long time scale. I know it would be a huge exercise but if this could be collated for all temperature stations it would be a more accurate means of identififying if world overall temperatures were really changing. If all these graphs showed no, or negligible, change then how could anyone claim the world average was changing?
To be fair, Perth shows warming while Darwin and Sydney don’t. My opinion is that there is no long term warming other than that caused by UHI.
Isn’t that what the combined Crutem4 global anomaly is?
And HadCRUT4 when you include HadSST3.
Well, there are two ways of looking at it. I got this quote from a recent Michael Mann post:
“This is a long standing problem in climate science. Morgan & Keith (1995, Subjective judgements by climate experts. Environmental Science & Technology 29, 468-476) showed that for some basic questions a very careful way of determining the data constructs can lead to a bimodal evaluation distribution rather than just a unilateral view around a mode value. This then raises questions about the usefulness of a median evaluation construct.” -Michael Mann
In other words, there are two ways of looking at it. What an asshole.
Bringing up Darwin again? Lol.
You’re not going to find much warming in the tropics because there hasn’t been.