Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
Recent Comments
- oeman50 on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on Latest Research In Climate Science
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
- gordon vigurs on UK Sucking Carbon
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
So much for the “hot spot”.
This is likely the same result for most equatorial locations affected by marine Trade Winds. I’d expect Caribbean, Northern Brazil, Eastern African, locations to show similar results!
The extra CO2 should mean a positive feedback in Darwin…surely? (: Evaporation should be running amok and wreaking havoc!
Bloody water vapour!
The extra CO2 causes a positive feedback, or a negative feedback, unless it causes no feedback, in which case it causes a negative positive backfeed. At other times, it makes no difference at all.
Steve does a great job bringing up these local temperature record graphs, and all the ones I have seen show no warming over a long time scale. I know it would be a huge exercise but if this could be collated for all temperature stations it would be a more accurate means of identififying if world overall temperatures were really changing. If all these graphs showed no, or negligible, change then how could anyone claim the world average was changing?
To be fair, Perth shows warming while Darwin and Sydney don’t. My opinion is that there is no long term warming other than that caused by UHI.
Isn’t that what the combined Crutem4 global anomaly is?
And HadCRUT4 when you include HadSST3.
Well, there are two ways of looking at it. I got this quote from a recent Michael Mann post:
“This is a long standing problem in climate science. Morgan & Keith (1995, Subjective judgements by climate experts. Environmental Science & Technology 29, 468-476) showed that for some basic questions a very careful way of determining the data constructs can lead to a bimodal evaluation distribution rather than just a unilateral view around a mode value. This then raises questions about the usefulness of a median evaluation construct.” -Michael Mann
In other words, there are two ways of looking at it. What an asshole.
Bringing up Darwin again? Lol.
You’re not going to find much warming in the tropics because there hasn’t been.