It is truly touching how alarmists forecast their future emotions, based on Hansen’s CO2 theory.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
Recent Comments
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Peter Carroll on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Robertvd on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Robertvd on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- conrad ziefle on The Real Hockey Stick Graph


in true IPCC form, all he has to do now is redefine the meaning of “million”
To be vulnerable to a broken heart, he must really love that ice.
He will now be overjoyed with the growth.
A heart is saved.
Someone told me that Professor Peter Wadhams sometimes posts anonymously as ‘grant holt’. 🙂
Grant Holt, I assume, is just a lay scientist as most of the denizens of the climate blogs.Thus, his Arctic ice projections, while perhaps amusingly wrong in hindsight, are understandable. It is the grossly aberrant Arctic ice forecasts of the massively funded and purportedly august institutions that really deserve our disgust.
Billy Liar,
If Grant Holt is actually a pseudonym of professor Peter Wadhams, then he is hereby demoted to the rank of “douche bag” for making irresponsible forecasts while under disguise as an amateur.
Wonder What his hurricane forecast was,