How NCDC Data Tampering Wrecks Climate Science

Look at these stunning graphs of temperatures in Alabama and Mississippi. Temperatures were very hot there from 1921 to 1957, and then plummeted in 1958

ScreenHunter_5969 Jan. 12 04.44

MS.xls

ScreenHunter_5968 Jan. 12 04.43

AL.xls

Temperatures in the deep south show no correlation with CO2.  However, they do show a strong correlation with something else that happened in 1958.

ScreenHunter_5970 Jan. 12 04.58

Why doesn’t peer reviewed science look at the actual climate? Probably because a small group of people at NCDC tamper with the data, and thus makes it useless and misleading to scientists. They adjust temperatures upwards linearly with atmospheric CO2 content, to create an appearance of a correlation – which does not actually exist.

ScreenHunter_5808 Jan. 05 13.14

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to How NCDC Data Tampering Wrecks Climate Science

  1. Anto says:

    Hmm, let me guess: either because 1958 was the year NASA came into being, or because Edsel sold its first cars. [I had also considered that the introduction of the Hula Hoop had something to do with it, but thought it was a bit of a long shot.]

    • Anto says:

      Just on the subject of 1958, check this out. Amazing! According to prevailing green theories, shouldn’t the entire world have entered a nuclear winter in 1959 and the entire world population died from radiation-related cancers?

      Feb 23rd – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Feb 27th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Mar 14th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Mar 14th – USSR performs atmospheric nuclear test
      Mar 15th – USSR performs atmospheric nuclear test
      Mar 21st – USSR performs atmospheric nuclear test
      Mar 22nd – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Apr 28th – Great Britain performs atmospheric nuclear test at Christmas Island
      May 5th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Enwetak
      May 11th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Enwetak
      May 11th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Bikini Island
      May 12th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Enwetak
      May 20th – US performs nuclear test at Enwetak (atmospheric tests)
      May 21st – US performs nuclear test at Bikini Island (atmospheric tests)
      May 26th – US performs nuclear test at Enwetak (atmospheric tests)
      May 30th – US performs nuclear test at Enwetak (atmospheric tests)
      May 31st – US performs nuclear test at Bikini Island (atmospheric tests)
      Jul 2nd – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Bikini Island
      Jul 12th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Bikini Island
      Jul 17th – US performs atmospheric nuclear Test at Enwetak
      Jul 22nd – US performs atmospheric nuclear Test at Bikini Island
      Aug 6th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Johnston Island
      Aug 18th – US performs atmospheric nuclear test at Enwetak
      Aug 27th – US performs nuclear test at South Atlantic Ocean
      Aug 30th – US performs nuclear test at S Atlantic Ocean
      Sep 2nd – Great Britain performs atmospheric nuclear test at Christmas Island
      Sep 6th – US performs nuclear test at S Atlantic Ocean
      Sep 11th – Great Britain performs atmospheric nuclear test at Christmas Island
      Sep 12th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 17th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 20th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Sep 21st – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 23rd – Great Britain performs atmospheric nuclear test at Christmas Island
      Sep 23rd – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 26th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 28th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 29th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Sep 30th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Oct 2nd – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Oct 5th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 5th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya
      Oct 8th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 10th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 10th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya
      Oct 12th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya USSR
      Oct 14th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 15th – USSR performs nuclear test at Novaya Zemlya
      Oct 16th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 19th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 26th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Oct 29th – US performs nuclear test at Nevada Test Site
      Nov 1st – USSR performs nuclear test
      Nov 3rd – USSR performs nuclear test

      http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/1958

    • Jason Calley says:

      Speaking of NASA, what about 1972…. have you noticed? Ever since 1972, when we stopped sending men to the Moon, the weather has been getting worse and worse! I think that not sending men to the Moon is having some kind of weird effect on the atmosphere. 🙂

      (My grandmother — long gone now, was an odd woman. Not only did she refuse to believe that men went to the moon, but she also believed that “all those space shots are messing up the weather!” It is probably just a coincidence, but she was also a life-long yellow-dog Democrat.)

  2. emsnews says:

    Excess aging is when you sleep with someone and they exhale on you.

    On the other hand, statistics show that being married means living longer! Conclusion: CO2 at night is good for you. 🙂

  3. philjourdan says:

    Whenever you tamper with the raw data, you destroy the ability to use it for future insights into cause and effect.

  4. sfx2020 says:

    What happened in 1958?

    • John West says:

      Strongest solar maximum recorded.

      • sfx2020 says:

        Thank you. I advise everyone who is interested in getting information out (and real data is always beautiful) to avoid any coyness. People interested (like myself) don’t always know everything, and those who might be skeptics, but on the fence, certainly won’t mind. The true believers won’t be swayed by any amount of data, but hammering home the message clearly is a service to the reader.

        Thanks again.

  5. globalcooler says:

    Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
    More fudging…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *