One day after Gavin is quoted as predicting at least five more years of pause, Mikey pats Gavin on the back for saying the pause is dead. What are these people smoking?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
Recent Comments
- arn on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- Robert Austin on The End Of Everything
- czechlist on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on The End Of Everything
When you start telling lies it is very difficult to keep track of them. It is even more difficult when many people are telling or repeating lies about the same subject.
Here is the pause that never existed. Note the first date they did not notice the lack of warming / pause. Then go down the list through to 2015
Great Post…
This is just another failed prediction and scare tactic by Dr Mann…
Jimbo–Thank You–Great collection.
Hey Jimbo, you’ve been published!
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/the-scientists-that-acknowledge-the-global-warming-pause-may-surprise-you.html
I wonder when MM will inform us that the 97% consensus is dead? Or the denial of the MWP? Or the hypothesis of AGW.
Ooh, I know!
When hell, or the Arctic, freezes over.
Whichever comes last.
How does Gavin know what solar output and volcanic activity will be in 10 years?
More funny stuff, this time in South America.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/20/massive-tampering-with-temperatures-in-south-america/#more-12620
If the “pause” really is a dead concept
#FauxPause#
Then that means the earth is COOLING! {:>D
Gail: You are right. If the pause is dead, that means global warming climate change or whatever is politically dead, however, the climate will continue to change as the climate decides that it wants to change or not and nothing or no-one will tell it how it has to behave.
Whenever Mann makes a stupid comment, I just say that “He said a ‘Mikie’!”
So its…”Ha! In your face! We are all going to die!” while dancing a jig. I remember these guys from middle school.
Playground Bullies
It continues to amaze me how these people using Twitter do not realise how quickly stupid comments are picked up and spread like “wild fire”. But this one from Mann really takes it to a new level.
They’re smoking the “straight dope” supplied by none other than the Dope-Dealer-in-Chief.
I guarantee that within 10 years I will be able to predict the winning lotto numbers. –Gavin (MD, Kreskin University)
Guys, Gavin just won the lottery! –M.E. Mann (PhD, Trisomy 21)
It is mikey. He took the scarecrows place. No brain.
Hmmm … someone is ‘off message’ … how long will it take to get them back on the same page?
I thought the sun didn’t do anything?
Yes, the sun can be ignored, unless it can’t.
If it can’t be ignored, he can say with confidence when it can be ignored again.
These guys have sophistry down to a science!
Excellent observation! I previously identified one of the new age sciences spawned by alarmism, and named it ‘Grantology’. With your permission, I believe we can jointly claim the discovery of another new age science, and name it ‘Sophistology’.
Grant please!
I ran the numbers given the CO2 absorption spectrum compared to Water. Water vapor already absorbs 98% of the spectrum that CO2 absorbs. So if we use a simple model of nitrogen Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor if the model goes from 0% CO@ to MAX CO2 (0% to 99.5% CO2) , assuming a grey body consistent with water/CO2 and grey body consistent with water/nitrogen
I came up with a temperature differential of 0.5 degrees Celsius(about 1 degree F), so how do these models come up with so much warming?
The ClimAstrologists get that high CO2 climate sensitivity by making water a FEEDBACK of CO2 and therefore multiplying the actual CO2 climate sensitivity threefold. This is the heart of the BIG LIE.
Here is the ‘BIG LIE’ straight from NASA:
Andrew Dessler has a great career ahead of him as a used care salesman.
Did anyone ask him why you need CO2 in this feedback at all?
Actually water temperature aka oceans DRIVES CO2 and not the other way around. Henry’s Law and all that.
The problem is that water vapour condenses out at ~4% atmospheric concentration, so we should be seeing more rain events and/or more extreme rain events. We aren’t.
Has anyone – and I mean anyone, including the charlatans at NOAA and NASA – looked at historical records of dewpoints for all US HCN stations to plot whether there has been an increasing trend in water vapour? If there is no such increase, then it just casts more doubt on the positive feedback spin they’re putting out.
Relative Humidity
http://i48.tinypic.com/2qlfnzn.jpg
Specific Humidity
http://www.climate4you.com/images/NOAA%20ESRL%20AtmospericSpecificHumidity%20GlobalMonthlyTempSince1948%20With37monthRunningAverage.gif
Lots more info and graphs:
http://www.climate4you.com/
Well that doesn’t jive with what’s predicted either. Shouldn’t the decrease in relative humidity – but more importantly, the lack of specific humidity outside near-ground levels – since 1948 be addressed in terms of the feedback mechanism by CO2? Or is it merely inconvenient for our lauded experts to deal with?
Good question!
I suspect not.
I have wondered why radiational cooling events are not being closely measured to detect any change in the rate at which the air cools, for example, on a clear windless night in the desert.
Mikey: “The moon isn’t made of cheese, d*niers!!”
Gavin: “In a few years, I’m going to make Quesadilla’s from it”
Mikey: “I’ll have some, too”
Ah, crap.. Please excuse extraneous apostrophe in Quesadillas; I think I’ve caught the disease from others.
PS: I hate the English language.
Time to start worrying, Mr Jones:
Dr. Phil Jones – CRU emails – 7th May, 2009
‘Bottom line: the ‘no upward trend’ has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.’
__________________
The fact that they use words like “worry, travesty and problem” to describe the lack of catastrophic warming tells us all we need to know.
Their work will only be validated (in their minds) when the get to say a big “told you so”
NOAA has spent $160 BILLION since 2003 on global warming research, and has yet to resolve basic problems we as skeptics keep pressing them on.
That $160 billion is money I’d much rather they not piss away and let me keep in my pocket.
Am I the only one happy they actually admit there’s a pause?
it’s a personal travesty when the thing they say they’re most worried about doesn’t materialize and they claim that that’s the travesty.
Hey, someone should ask them to make a bet on it! Make them put their money where the mouth overflows.
Are they going to overhaul the models in 3 years, “at the latest”, and admit they were worthless?
Dr. Hans von Storch – Spiegel – 20 June 2013
“…the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius (0.11 degrees Fahrenheit) — a value very close to zero….If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models….”
You’re dealing with the Alynski Style approach for creating chaos.
You know their agenda.
These people have no rational motivations, they’re bloody activists.
The sooner you get this the better.
Obama is one of them.
Every time we try to come up with rational arguments these bastards are laughing their pants off.
Their book of rules: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals
These people look pretty stupid http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a94_1421971494