These folks are complete whack-a-doodles
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- Robert Austin on The End Of Everything
- czechlist on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on The End Of Everything
- Gamecock on The End Of Everything
With them it’s all about the “concern”.
The way to think like a progressive? Put your mouth in gear, but leave your brain disengaged…
But seriously, Gavin, whoever u r, why do you lie and misled about something so serious?
Too easy.
http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/radical-greens.html
“There are now elements in the environmental movement who are so worried about the state of the planet that they have lost all sense of proportion. This is alarming for those at the receiving end of their mindless wrath. It does not help to protect the environment either.”
I just love the phrase “mindless wrath” – it sums up the alarmists perfectly.
The Grapes Of Mindless Wrath.
Now?
Was this written in 1971?
lie and mislead? lol. They’ve really decided that reality = lie.
NotReal-a…what a sap, a statist sap…
Since 1945 they have assumed that Stalin’s “Great Social Experiment” could not fail. Still today, many are trying to be “stupid like a fox”, totally unaware that the seventy-year era of rule by deception has ended and Big Brother is going down!
Our challenge now is to:
1. Retain the benefits of, and
2. Eliminate the deception in
The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Social_Experiment.pdf
We must not get side-tracked trying to punish those who used public funds to deceive the public for the past seventy years.
I think she was talking to herself in the last tweet
Pick one:
1. Society collapses in two weeks OR
2. Society collapses in 100 years.
I’ll take door number two!
Does this person seriously consider all of the things that “could” happen in 100 years? She must be a nervous wreck.
Obviously she hasn’t seen the numbers on green energy. We should demand she take herself off the grid and try to survive for a few days without fossil fuels. Or, just to give her a dose of reality, she can pretend all the energy she is using is (no such thing) green and just chip in an additional few hundred percent more in money to offset the extra pretend cost. This, just to get an actual feel off what it would be like to go off the fossil fuel grid.
Clueless people. Low oil prices kill off most green projects right now. Number of pallet heaters in Germany collapsed, oil is cheaper despite the subsidy.
Idiots and their stupid computers
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/blizzard-15/blizzard-bust-nyc-worst-fears-fail-materialize-n294336
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhpNJAKq7dE
Prince Charles IS BACK!!!
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/26/prince-charles-global-pact-climate-change-magna-carta-earth
Global Warming Causing Yeti!!!
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/blizzard-15/yeti-sighting-boston-during-storm-n295571
As a low level quality control grunt from western Canada, I would just like to thank Tony and WUWT for providing all the ammo I need to wage war on all my lefty friends. facts and figures seem to anger them.
I’ll second that. I have sent many articles to the Canadian Government over the last few years. Thanks Tony.
Wow! Arguments right out of the Medieval era (count the logical fallacies)!
The cutest thing about “progressives” is how REgressive they are in reality; downright primitive.
I usually refer to them as “so-called Progressives” but after reading your comment, I may start calling them “pREgressives”.
The name “Progressive” is actually really good marketing though… just like how the Russian Communists picked “Bolshevik” (which means “Majority”) while they were still a tiny splinter group.
Well, there’s “lying” and then there’s “being gullible” enough to believe the lies you’re told.
This person represents the latter instance.
Again from Australian Caca a country where you cannot do anything thanks to the politically correct left which destroyed that country as a living alternative. LOL
Your article is mis-labeled. That is not thinking. Just regurgitating.
I read both posts of Steven Goddard’s back and forths with this obviously debased and unstable woman, and, I must say, her insulting and smarmy Twitter attacks are most illuminating. In two separate posts, she uses the pretend word “anomalities” and then says “whomever you are…” in another post. And these are supposed to be the smart people?
“Global warming” in a nutshell: the religious cult of the malleable and simple automatons.
I don’t understand: why would society collapse with fossil fuels in 100 years?
Does she mean that we’ll run out of fossil fuels in 100 years? If so, aren’t we back to society collapsing within two weeks without fossil fuels?
She thinks we will have run away Gore Bull Warbling.
However the earth is certainly not going to warm catastrophically for another 65 kyr.
Where are we in terms of the Milankovitch cycle and solar insolation?
NOAA: @ 60N June.
Holocene peak insolation: 523 Wm-2
………………………………………………………..decrease = 47 Wm-2
NOW (modern Warm Period) 476 Wm-2
……………………………………………………….. decrease = 12 Wm-2
Depth of the last ice age – around 464 Wm?2
The earth is a heck of a lot closer to the solar insolation during the depths of an ice age than it is to the Holocene Optimum!
The ClimAstrologists are saying that the solar insolation decrease is going to be trumped by CO2 forcing when the entire CO2 forcing is 32 to 44 W m–2 [cf., Reid, 1997]. and all but 5 to 6 W m–2 of that forcing occurs in the first 200 ppm CO2. (modtran)
Some how 47 W m–2 trumps 5 W m–2 in my book and that is using THEIR numbers!
So according to that paper, based on empirical evidence, the earth will be flirting with a glacial inception for the next 65 kyr.
This fall of 2012 a href=”http://www.clim-past.net/8/1473/2012/cp-8-1473-2012.pdf”>Can we predict the duration of an interglacial? agrees and gives the calculated solar insolation values @ 65N on June 22 for several glacial inceptions:
Current value – insolation = 479W m?2 (from that paper)
MIS 7e – insolation = 463 W m?2,
MIS 11c – insolation = 466 W m?2,
MIS 13a – insolation = 500 W m?2,
MIS 15a – insolation = 480 W m?2,
MIS 17 – insolation = 477 W m?2
Giant gap between what scientists think and what public thinks:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/poll-shows-giant-gap-public-scientists-28583862
American Association for the Advancement of Science???
The global warming HOAX started at a conference in 1975 in the US organized by the anthropologist Margaret Mead, 1974 president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
The Fabian Connection
You can say that again! But after all what members of the public actually worry about Polar Bear “penis bones”? http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joseph-rossell/2015/01/29/lefty-grist-now-claims-humans-literally-breaking-polar-bear-penises
And Liberals truly believe they are the intelligent.
“With fossil fuels it collapses in 100 years.” What collapses, and how? Data, please. Not speculation.