Monthly Archives: January 2015

The hockey stick was created largely by altering historical data. The graph below shows how Gavin has altered his own global surface temperatures by 0.4 C, just since 2003.  2003 : FigA.txt 2014 : Fig.A.txt The shape is not accidental. By pushing most of … Continue reading →

Some of the most impressive NCDC climate fraud is done in Texas, where they turn a long term cooling trend into an out of control warming trend. So far, Texas is having their coldest year on record.  

I write signal processing software, which is used by government spy agencies to track our enemies’ phone conversations. It is imperative that the signal be accurately and precisely portrayed. That is the exact opposite of what Gavin and Tom do, which … Continue reading →

The hottest temperature ever recorded at Marble Bar was 121 F on January 11, 1905. That month averaged 110 F.

The Guardian publishes blatant Dana Nuttercelli climate fraud nearly every day, but censors an IPCC lead author

Over the past 25 years, January temperatures in Maryland have dropped nearly three degrees C. This has been one of the worst cycling months I can remember – continuous ice on the bike paths.

The post 1940 cooling wrecked the hockey stick, so government climate scientists realized that they would have to make it disappear, in order to keep their funding coming in. From: Tom Wigley <[email protected]> To: Phil Jones <[email protected]> Subject: 1940s Date: Sun, … Continue reading →

Keeping an eye on Barack Obama’s Goebbel’s style propaganda campaign. There has never been any survey or study which even remotely supports this idea.  Only 52% of American Meteorological Society members believe that global warming is primarily due to humans, … Continue reading →

Gavin didn’t like all that cooling from 1940 to 1980 in Iceland, so he simply made it disappear. 2014 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis 2012 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

Without further investigation, there is no way to determine the precise extent of the under-inflation problem.