Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Greg in NZ on Ellen Flees To The UK
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Disillusioned on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Russell Cook on The End Of Polar Bears
- Russell Cook on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Allan Shelton on Scientist Kamala Harris
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- czechlist on HUD Climate Advisor
- Scott Allen on Ellen Flees To The UK
For seventy years (1945 – 2015), world leaders used federal research grant funds to guide government science toward the goals of UN’s Agenda 21.
This unethical practice was invisible until the goals of UN Agenda 21 were finally published in 1972.
If we are lucky Washington DC will get buried under five feet of ‘Global Warming’ next week as Buffalo NY did in November.
In order for the IPCC’s projections/a> to come true rate of temperature rise needs to dramatically accelerate. It’s not.
If you take the last 30 years of data from GISTEMP, You will find that from 1985 to 2000 the rate of temperature rise was 0.2 deg/decade and from 2000 to 2015 the rate has been .1 deg/decade. That works out to a negative acceleration of minus -0.01deg/decade².
Don’t worry Steve, Gavin is doing his best to accelerate the non-warming. !
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/plot/rss/from:2013/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/trend/plot/rss/from:2013/trend/plot/uah/from:2013/plot/uah/from:2013/trend/plot/gistemp/from:2013/plot/gistemp/from:2013/trend
Well, the link works but it should have looked like this:
IPCC’s projections
It’s a pity the chart doesn’t include the lowest projection of all – the “commitment”, which assumed zero growth in greenhouse gasses. The most accurate projection so far.
If you would put the error bars (or grey area) you can show that the data are really so noisy that no conclusions can be drawn.
I can draw the conclusion that there isn’t any acceleration sufficient enough to result in the ridiculous IPCC projections. Click on my link
They should at least refer to them as tamperatures, not temperatures.