In 1999, Pat Michaels made one of the very few accurate climate model forecasts
Bangor Daily News – Google News Archive Search
His forecast was spot on.
Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems
How far off is that climate model going to be when we go into the next ice age?
By a factor of four, Perhaps even more!
Wrong Oliver,
ClimAstrologists will adjust the data and show it is warming and the mile high ice sheet on top of Chicago is just Republican lies.
And the mountain came to Mohammed. Ice, hell freezing over, hope that’s not too metaphorical for you.
Hell IS Freezing Over…. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/12/24A20CC000000578-2906866-image-a-56_1421077340462.jpg
http://globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/B7ATEEXCYAQC84_.jpg_large.jpeg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ISIS-crushes-head-of-murderer.jpg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/8-christians-murdered-by-isis-tweet-2.jpg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/isis-cage-800×534.jpeg
That is a great article, pointing out how corrupt the process was, and still is. And Michaels is dead-on with every claim. Amazing.
one of the few things the BDN (my local paper) got right I guess.
I would be curious to see the 99 model, and how they have changed. Of course the current model match fairly well until after 1998, is likely due to hind-casting with particulates, and to adjusting surface data.
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
How far off is that climate model going to be when we go into the next ice age?
By a factor of four,
Perhaps even more!
Wrong Oliver,
ClimAstrologists will adjust the data and show it is warming and the mile high ice sheet on top of Chicago is just Republican lies.
And the mountain came to Mohammed.
Ice, hell freezing over, hope that’s not too metaphorical for you.
Hell IS Freezing Over….
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/12/24A20CC000000578-2906866-image-a-56_1421077340462.jpg
http://globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/B7ATEEXCYAQC84_.jpg_large.jpeg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ISIS-crushes-head-of-murderer.jpg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/8-christians-murdered-by-isis-tweet-2.jpg
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/isis-cage-800×534.jpeg
That is a great article, pointing out how corrupt the process was, and still is. And Michaels is dead-on with every claim. Amazing.
one of the few things the BDN (my local paper) got right I guess.
I would be curious to see the 99 model, and how they have changed. Of course the current model match fairly well until after 1998, is likely due to hind-casting with particulates, and to adjusting surface data.
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.