On February 20, 2014 experts said that British floods are caused by global warming.
Six weeks earlier, experts said that British droughts are caused by global warming.
Britain warned of more droughts caused by climate change and growing population – Telegraph
Just the opposite of Texas.
And apparently there is no such thing as weather anymore. It’s all climate.
it would be really interesting to ask the public to end this sentence:
Global warming causes …
Most people would be unable to say anything other than “it gets warmer”. That is why they lost. Because you can cherry pick a few events and claim they are caused by “global warming”, but as time passes sooner or later you get precisely the opposite event and then they are stuck.
This is why the Dead Parrot talks this December will be just like the Monty Python sketch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
…. just watching it again.
I’m surprised alarmists have not said that the global temperature is only “resting”.
That is what a more “sticky” jet stream will do. Welcome to the new normal?
So your saying the current jet stream pattern is unprecedented? It hasn’t been like this before? Why not go look at the meteorological data from say the mid 50’s and tell us how the current pattern is so different from then?
There’s some evidence indicating that the rapid arctic warming of the past decades is changing the jet-stream:
https://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/1/014005/article
You left out the ozone.
Sun, Ozone, Polar Jet and the Brewer-Dobson Circulation
Let me see if I can trace the different steps via various papers.
First step Ozone formation and destruction:
First NASA has finally admitted that the sun is not constant and although the Total Solar Insolation is relatively constant the distribution of the energy among wavelengths is not. This is the critical point.
2007 was before the deep solar minimum.
“…A 12-year low in solar “irradiance”: Careful measurements by several NASA spacecraft show that the sun’s brightness has dropped by 0.02% at visible wavelengths and 6% at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996….” science(DOT)nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum/
NASA has also admitted different wavelengths of sunlight do different things in different parts of the atmosphere such as atmospheric water vapor, oxygen (O2) and ozone (O3).
Solar Spectral Irradiance Data
THE KEY
Sunlight + oxygen (O2) ===> O + O
(Oxygen is disassociated in to two atoms and wants to glom onto something.)
O + O2 ====> O3 (ozone)
The reverse also happens in the atmosphere so the formation and destruction of ozone is dependent on the shifting of the amount of solar radiation at different wavelengths and NASA has shown those amounds DO SHIFT.
http://www.oxidationsystems.com/products/ozone_formation.GIF
image from: http://www.oxidationsystems.com/products/ozone.html
CONTINUED
OZONE CIRCULATION
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GENERAL CIRCULATION OF THE ATMOSPHERE AND THE GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL OZONE AS DETERMINED BY THE NIMBUS III SATELLITE INFRARED INTERFEROMETER SPECTROMETER
Changes in Ozone and Stratospheric Temperature:
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/features/200402_tango/ozone_temperature_graph.gif
The blocking phenomenon in weather patterns is typical of a meridional pattern jet stream.
Top-Down Solar Modulation of Climate: evidence for centennial-scale change
Then we get into the effect on the poles.
Quasi-biennial oscillation and solar cycle influences on winter Arctic total ozone
The influence of solar variability and the quasi-biennial oscillation on lower atmospheric temperatures and sea level pressure
I have another dozen pages of information from peer reviewed studies but I will leave it at that.
A “sticky” jet stream is a meridional pattern
When did the earth see a meridional pattern jet stream?
When the Wisconsin glaciation was taking place. The ‘Polar Vortex’ we have seen for the past couple of winters has the same shape as the Laurentide. Cold and lots of snow on the east coast but not on the west coast.
http://www.intechopen.com/source/html/38637/media/image2.jpeg
Position of the ice sheets in North America at 10,000 and 7,000 years before present.
Europe area covered by ice
http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/eur%2822-.gif
Eurasia during most extreme part of full glacial conditions (17,000-15,000 14C y.a.).
http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/euras%282.gif
“This map concentrates on the time window slightly after the LGM, when aridity seems to have reached its most extreme point. Only slightly moister conditions prevailed for most of the period 22,000-14,000 14C y.a. (25,000-15,000 calendar years ago). A large area of extreme desert conditions existed across central Asia (dark red), surrounded by semi-desert (light red), under conditions much colder than the present-day. In the north, Siberia was colder and much more arid, with steppe-tundra (pink) and polar desert (grey). Ice masses (light grey) were present in north-western Siberia. In China, colder more arid conditions caused a retreat of forests, with grasslands (yellow) and open woodlands (medium green) in southern China and Japan. Forest steppe (violet) and conifer forest (blue green) may have predominated elsewhere. In south Asia, rainforest (darkest green) retreated and was replaced by grasslands (yellow) and monsoon forests and woodlands (lime-green). Scrub and open woodland (lighest green) probably existed in presently moist forest climates of Bangladesh and SW China.”
Okay cfgj, Your more “sticky” jet stream is the cause. Now be a bright boy and tell us all how taxing and controlling CO2 & power production is going to save us?
It is NOT going to save US, it is going to save the elite and put them in full control of the human population as I said in comment. (It is presently waiting for Steve to dig it out of moderation.)
Gail,
I am surprised that I can be so much in agreement with someone—noting the two salaries per family need. But then again, we are quite spoiled in terms of what we think we need.
Ditto the elitist arrogance.
The first I saw of the sticky jet stream meme , was when it had been attributed to warmer Arctic Ocean temps causing the vortex and therefore a blocking of a high pressure area which in turn caused New York to be hit by a ‘hurricane on steroids” nonsense..
cfgj, I think it is good for you to comment here, because differences of opinion or understanding leads to greater understanding by everyone. I hope that no one takes the time for ad hominem attacks because that would only diminish efforts.
If you could be more thorough in your line of thinking it would be good, and also
better I think to use at least one of your given names.
As I am a retired AP chem/physics instructor I find that what Gail keeps presenting makes me want to go back and teach at least one class.
Most of it is new to me. Sometimes, even the units.
The largest takeaway here I think is the fact that there has been an observance of variations in intensity within the EM spectrum which is significantly out of phase with the intensity of the spectrum as a whole. That fact has many ramifications.
The largest ramification I would think, should be variations of waves just shorter than UV
and of course IR.
Reblogged this on Climatism.
Now that’s climate change.
Britons are always warned that there is more of whatever happened recently coming soon. Same as the US; the first rule of weather forecasting, you have a greater than 50% chance of being right if you forecast the same weather tomorrow as you had today.
I suggest it’s the rise in population, especially in the south of the UK that’s the issue. More people, no more reservoirs – because the Greens won’t let anymore be built!
If the climate changes, MOVE. The Sahara was nice during the last glacial period and Canada will have much more productive land if there is global warming.
If you can really predict global warming or cooling, make some money buy real estate that is currently of low value and in the global changes you will make big bucks.