More On The Fake Greenland Meltdown

Climate  fraudsters keep telling the press that Greenland is melting down. With satellite technology, you can see that they are lying. There is a strip about 60 miles wide on the northern and western edges of the ice sheet where significant melting is occurring. The rest of the ice sheet shows very little signs of melt.

ScreenHunter_2531 Jul. 16 09.13ScreenHunter_2532 Jul. 16 09.13ScreenHunter_2533 Jul. 16 09.14

The interior of the ice sheet is very cold, and has gotten nowhere near the melting point this summer

ScreenHunter_2536 Jul. 16 09.33summit:status:webcam

Day after day, the Guardian lies about this. This scam is being promoted by the very filth of the Earth.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to More On The Fake Greenland Meltdown

  1. gator69 says:

    By their metrics, a car in need of a paint job is missing it’s engine.

  2. cfgj says:

    It’s melting and we can see it.

    • gator69 says:

      You’re a dunce, and we can all see it.

      An idiot, dolt, dullard or (archaically) mome is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

      • cfgj says:

        So gravimetric, altimetric, SAR and GPS measurements are not enough for you to admit it’s losing mass? I hope not, as that would be denialism.

        • gator69 says:

          Are we in an ice age, or an interglacial? Stupid much?

          Besisdes, we are discussing the moronic claim of “meltdown” as applied to the entire island.

          Ice melts dunce.

        • Parroting mindless propaganda.

        • Billy Liar says:

          cfgj,

          Please post a link to the altimetric data for Summit Station in Greenland. I would just like to see how much lower it is now than it was when established as GISP-2 in 1989.

          Many thanks, you appear to know all about altimetry.

        • Billy Liar says:

          Oh, and when you’ve got the figures can you apportion them between isostasy and melting. Thanks.

        • Billy Liar says:

          Oh, I left out the firn process (compaction), so isostasy, the firn process and melting.

    • Stewart Pid says:

      Moron … how does snow and ice melt at -9 C or did u not look at the Summit Webcam conditions side panel???

      • cfgj says:

        That ice sheet is losing mass mainly my by melting closer to the coast as well as through the speedup of ice-streams.

        • Stewart Pid says:

          And that has been happening for the last 2.5 million years and so what is your point … again MORON!!

    • wizzum says:

      No its not. The DMI admit that it’s snowing more than melting each year, they claim loss is from glacial calving,
      If Greenland is losing ice mass it is from lesser precipitation, not from melting.

      • cfgj says:

        The surface-mass-balance (SMB) of Greenland is also negative over a normal year recently. Both calving and melting have increased.

        • gator69 says:

          Dunce, there is no “normal” in climate or weather, only averages over specified time periods. (See: “Cherry Picking”)

          How long will it take to melt all the ice in Greenland at the rate of loss we are seeing right now?

        • wizzum says:

          Go to the DMI page, they refute your assertion.

        • wizzum says:

          Even if you are correct, calving will stop as there will not be enough snow added to the top of the ice pack to continue the flow of glaciers to the sea. When calving stops, then glaciers are dying, not the other way around.

  3. Giftoftruth says:

    Reblogged this on Giftoftruth United and commented:
    Without prejudice to all of these comments, I would like to add a different perspective to Greenland:

    1. I came across some mad-hatter theory called greenlandtheory.com and I read it and what at first seems preposterous, does add up;
    2. We do not actually know what the surface of Greenland looks like;
    I have zoomed down on google earth etc. and all I see is a flat white mat surface: NO TERRAIN or features; I draw maps for school text books and believe me, one can clearly see the rectangular overlay;
    The maps posted here are too small in scale to determine if they are authentic;

    3. All we have is DIGITAL imaging; I certainly do not know anyone who has been to the centre of Greenland; I cannot find any info on any activity; so, there are already arguments without any real first-hand proof;
    In addition, Greenland is NOT an island, it’s HUGE; a continent; it’s deceptively well hidden on the type of 2D map we conventionally use; there is less than 100 000 people living on the southern coastal edges and NO-ONE knows what’s going on North or in the interior;
    I did a little bit of investigation; What I did discover is Camp David, a secret under ground base built in the 50s;
    Lately, a lot of illegal air traffic over Greenland, mostly lear jets; where are they going? If I was the cabal, I would use Greenland as headquarters … that’s what one or two are claiming; there is something odd about Greenland and something hidden, I am certain; I certainly found very little on Greenland, seems worth a deep investigation; in peace

  4. inMAGICn says:

    you’re

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *