The same people who have been telling us that Polar Bears are dying due to polar sea ice loss, now say it will be another ten years before they start being affected.
Study: Polar Bears Could Feel Global Warming’s Sting by 2025 – ABC News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- arn on Protesting Too Much Snow
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Disillusioned on Protesting Too Much Snow
- arn on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
as noted in your previous post there is a lot of BS/lies being disseminated to push climate catastrophe. Polar bears are doing great, yet the very same researchers have published that heavier ice caused the most stress for seal and bears, turn around and publish that less ice is endangering those very same species. Such papers should be retracted
Read
http://landscapesandcycles.net/blind-polar-bear-researchers.html
and
http://landscapesandcycles.net/less-arctic-ice-can-be-beneficial.html
WTF is the USGS doing modeling Polar Bears?
The times have changed. The methods have not.
https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/3rd-congress/organisation/guidelines.htm
I had exactly the same thought. While the news release says the report will be part of a F&WL Service “recovery plan” (whatever that is), it gives credit for the study to the USGS. More evidence that our (strike that–it’s not ‘ours’, we lost control of it 6.5 years ago) the federal government is totally out of control.
Unfortunately, virtually every outlet that runs this AP story will feature quotes from the Center for Biological Survey, or the Center for Biological Diversity, but nothing from Dr. Susan Crockford.
http://polarbearscience.com/2015/06/30/usgs-promotes-another-flawed-polar-bear-model-ghg-emissions-still-primary-threat/
Any follower of Tony that has a child/grandchild studying the “poor” polar bears in school has a great opportunity to get them on the right track over at polarbearscience.com.
I see its ‘could’ again. If my mother had wheels she ‘could’ be a bus. If the heat dont get ’em, they’ll be disolved in the ‘acidic’ oceans!!!
The Polar Bears COULD be doing worse in 2015. On the other hand they COULD be doing better. There is even a chance they COULD be doing exactly the same. They get paid for putting out this drivel?
ABC news got tired of me commenting on their BS articles so they blocked me from commenting. Dissent is not allowed.
Out government at work. Endangered status for a species that is not endangered and a now a “recovery plan” for the same.
My mother constantly gets nuisance alligators in her lake, that is entirely on her property, and yet is prohibited from dispatching them. She has to call a state licensed agent to come out and catch the alligator, which if under 6 feet, must be relocated. A hunting permit will cost you $1000, and is only good for two gators.
Alligators were never endangered in Florida. My father was a seventh generation Floridian, and those real Floridians were gob smacked when gators were given a protected status in 1967. As a kid I used to see them in every drainage ditch and pond before the 1967 regulation.
The real problem was that of invasive species. Damn Yankees and snow birds don’t understand the ecology of the state they invaded!
Wait…….
What’s this crap about an updated model?
The Laughingstock-in-Chief and Al-the-Bore have declared the “Science is Settled” ??
One does NOT need to update the models and change the predictions in a “settled science”……
Maybe the climate-clowns (aka climate “scientists”) didn’t get the memo?
I’m pretty sure in 2025
we will read:”Polar bears to feel sting in 2035″
and in 2035 they will write 2045 and so on.
(btw :nice to see that more and more people reliase that all this is part of communist bullsh!t)
When I was doing research, it never occurred to me that the way to make things come out the way I wanted to was simply just to build myself a totally unverifiable model that gave me the desired result far enough into the future to appear credible, but no so far as to be irrelevant, Dumb me!