Marco’s American Future Fund Fraud

Marco Rubio’s American Future Fund is spending huge amounts of money running ads from two former Trump University students, Kevin Scott and Bob Guillo, alleging they were scammed and the program was a fraud.

Here are the course evaluations they filled out at the time, showing that both of them gave the course top marks after taking it.





This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Marco’s American Future Fund Fraud

  1. Mike says:

    Nonsense. First, you omitted the being watched when filling out factor. Second, there are multiple stages. The first is a free intro which is what they advertised in papers. Basically a hard sell for 15K. That session was basically to sell on the 30K package. Why does this matter? Because people often love things until its all over and they realize they were scammed. Madoff investors were thrilled until they weren’t. Most of these types of responses being cited by Trump and his people are from the free intro.

    • Nonsense. First, those were very small children, subject to frequent and severe beatings who filled out those forms. Second, they were promised juice in boxes if they took all their naps on time. Trump failed to bring them juice in boxes. Mary Todd Lincoln was thrilled at the debut of “Our American Cousin” until she found out the true cost of attending plays!

  2. aeroguy48 says:

    These documents won’t ever be shown by the MSM.

  3. Jim T says:

    So they filled out these forms before they actually tried to use what they were taught? Sort of like an inner-city high school valedictorian thinking they are well prepared for a top-flight university after being scammed by the “soft bigotry of low expectations”?

  4. ACRC says:

    Is it possible these two individuals had not yet realized they had been defrauded when they filled out the evaluation forms? Fraud is a con game, you know.

  5. rahlf43 says:

    I certainly don’t like political hit pieces, in either direction. These forms are of not much value out of context and Mike and JimT are hitting the nails right on the head.
    Most of us have filled out post course surveys, sheets of paper handed out ten minutes before the end of a long day of lecturing and looking at slides.
    These short, perfunctory forms, have little or no value other than positive ones being used falsely to validate a course or negative ones used falsely to denigrate a course.


  6. Gail Combs says:

    Except this is a replay.

    The first time the original student even made a video raving about the course and how much it helped her. At that point the judge should have tossed the case but instead allowed the lawyers to go out and dig up other students.

    The judge BTW IS Mexican, born of two illegals and therefore MEXICAN by the laws of Mexico. Also he may not be an American.

    In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:

    Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”

    The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.

    The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.

    Over a century ago, the Supreme Court correctly confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called ‘Slaughter-House cases’ [83 US 36 (1873)] and in [112 US 94 (1884)]. In Elk v.Wilkins, the phrase ‘subject to its jurisdiction’ excluded from its operation ‘children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States.’ In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered not an American citizen because the law required him to be ‘not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.’ …

    Maybe I should dig up these lawyers and go after the computer school that defrauded me out of $22,000. They folded and left the state leaving lots of students in the lurch. So the state stepped in and payed a minor amount back. Seems the state goofed and the bond was way short of the actual required amount. A student taking the pittence was then barred from suing. The billionaire involved moved to New York and started another school/scam…

  7. Gail Combs says:

    Marco Rubio sure knows about ‘shady’ real estate dealings doesn’t he?

    When his brother in-law got out of jail, Rubio used his influence as House Majority Whip to get him a real estate license without disclosing they were related (conflict of interest)

    His brother in-law was part drug ring.
    So it is actually even worse than Marco’s shady credit cards. He has the same type of connections to the drug world as the Clinton’s

    There is a 555 page report on Rubio dirty dealings –

    Dirty business –

    Rubio and Amnesty –

    Remember Fox is owned by the same two pro-open border foreigners, Murdoch and Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Murdoch is co-chair of the open borders group, the Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE). PNAE was one of biggest supporters of Marco Rubio and the Gang of 8 Immigration Reform Bill/Amnesty push. They flooded the airways and media with pro immigration reform propaganda. Fox News was also devoid of unbiased reporting of this bill….

    Rubio’s press secretary, Brooke Sammon, is the daughter of a Fox News Media executive who was in charge of putting the candidate debate questions together.
    Bill Sammon Is The “Secret Weapon” Shaping The Fox News Debate
    Bill Sammon, Fox News’ vice president of News and Washington managing editor, is reportedly the “secret weapon” helping to develop the questions moderators will ask at the network’s August 6 debate. Internal emails and critics within Fox have exposed Sammon’s history of deception and his efforts to use his position at Fox to slant the network’s news coverage.

  8. Gail Combs says:

    If you want to know who is really ripping of American students, look no further that Obama.

    Why Leftists Destroyed College — Professor Duke Pesta

    Somewhere in the middle they mention the transfer of student loans from states and banks to the Federal Government by Obummer. Since then the costs have sky rocketed. While Tte number of professors have stayed the same, the number of Admin has also sky rocketed.
    The quality of the education and it’s usefulness in earning a living has also bombed leaving the kids with huge loans and no means to pay them off.

    Dr Duke Pesta, an English professor, says his junior and senior students can not even read at the high school level! Shakespeare and other great works are no longer taught and although about 1/2 the students should be flunked out they are not because of the $$$ from the government.

    I can remember in Freshmen orientation we were told 1/2 the class would not make it to sophomore year. 60% were flunked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *