Obama’s Career Started and Ended With Dirty Tricks

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

From Kenya’s leading newspaper.

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

From Nigeria’s leading newspaper.

Nigerian Observer Online Edition

And then things got even worse ….

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Obama’s Career Started and Ended With Dirty Tricks

  1. arn says:

    Damn it-
    those evil racist birthers even exist in Nigeria.
    ((but thanks god we have an opinion monopol that can turn ice age into global warming,terrorists into freedom fighters,statesmen into hitler
    and nigerians into hawaiians by simply changing the story.))
    Such a method combined with idiots who will believe anything no matter how many times their opinion masters have been exposed as liars
    -and you can do whatever you want to do and get away with it.

  2. MrGrimNasty says:

    I expect you are aware of Daniel Greenfield (Sultan Knish).

    (Scientism – touches on the climate change business)

    (Supposedly suppressed potentially awkward photo with Nation of Islam ‘friend’.)

    He has quite a lot to say about Clinton and the current plot/collusion circus too.

  3. garyh845 says:

    Good stuff – I have some more. But, I thought you were going to pop this up, Tony:

    Obama knows his way around a ballot
    By David Jackson and Ray Long
    Tribune staff reporters
    April 3, 2007
    They took the link down in 2013 – can’t find a new one – but I have the document (word). If you want it, email me and shoot it over. It’s a good read that, like every other story that would have helped to keep him out of the WH, had our entire national media not been in the tank for him. Bottom line of the story is that through his actions, the The Chicago Board of Elections’ Biased Decisions Eliminated Barack Obama’s Four Opponents for his first run for office; Ill State Senate.

  4. garyh845 says:

    Tony – did you ever see this one?

    Within approx one week of his announcement for the POTUS his literary agent, changed the, “he was born in Kenya,” to “He was born in HI.”

  5. Anon says:

    I am not a “birther” and the issue does not interest me in the least. I will take Obama’s word for it that he was born in Hawaii. But what we are left with is blatant “resume fraud”… and the “little people” of this world lose jobs and careers over this type thing all the time. Just appalling and sad.

    • tonyheller says:

      Why would you take Obama’s word for anything?

      • Gator says:

        Which word?

      • TA says:

        “Why would you take Obama’s word for anything?”

        And how would Obama know anyway, since he would be very young at the time of his birth. :) I’m betting he doesn’t remember it, or where it took place.

        Obama has no credibility. He hides his past. He has a composite girlfriend.

        Obama is the biggest enabler of radical Islamic terrorism in world history.

        Obama may be giving a little testimony in the future about the corruption and illegalities he perpetrated while in Office. Obama tried to use the Power of the State to undermine his political opponents but now this sedition is coming to light and Obama and all his leftwing friends are involved in it up to their necks.

        The Truth will out. Unless Hillary had been elected, and then we wouldn’t know the depths to which our governing elites had sunk. But she lost the election and may lose a lot more before it’s all over. Let’s hope everyone gets just what they deserve. I have a feeling Trump is going to see to it.

    • RAH says:

      I just don’t know what to believe about his place of birth. But what I do know is that he is dirty because he refused to release his college records and medical records. Either one of which could potentially reveal his place of birth.

  6. feathers says:

    Brian Williams was there are witnessed both the Hawaii-based hospital birth and sniper fire in the Balkans.

  7. Taphonomic says:

    I was recently watching a show called “Bosch” on Netflix. It was spoiled for me as Jeri Ryan was one of the actors. I just couldn’t stop thinking that if not for her and her BS in her divorce, Obama would not have been President.

  8. Jimmy Haigh says:


  9. The Other Brad says:

    It’s hilarious folks call you a birther when all you do is post News articles from the time stating he was born in Kenya.

  10. u.k.(us) says:

    “believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see.”

  11. Kris Johanson says:


  12. scott allen says:

    So I watched the video of Hillary (who couldn’t tell the truth if her life depended on it).

    She said she was the first “First Lady” to visit a war zone since Eleanor Rosevelt in World War II (at the very end of the video).

    Pat Nixon visited Viet Nam and Barbara Bush went to Saudi Arabia during the First Gulf War.


    That “woman” must be mainlining something.

  13. just a thought says:

    Here’s the real story of Hillarity in Bosnia…

  14. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    And then there’s the issue of Barack Obama’s Social Security Number (SSN). When Obama applied to Occidental College in 1979, he used SSN 042-68-4425.

    Let’s take a look at this number. Since 1936, SSNs have been composed of three parts:
    1. The first three digits are the area number. Area numbers are assigned based on the zip code of the applicants mailing address.
    2. The next two digits are the group number.
    3. The last four digits are the serial number.

    Area numbers 040-049 are assigned to zip codes in Connecticut. There are no records of Obama having lived in Connecticut before age 18.

    A search of the Social Security database for SSN 042-68-4425 shows wages were withheld under that number for two individuals:
    • Harrison J. Bounel
    • Barack H. Obama

    Can two people have the same SSN? No. SSNs are unique and are never re-used. So who does SSN 042-68-4425 belong to?

    In 2008, a SSN verification request was submitted to the Social Security Administration (SSA) with Barack Obama’s name listed as the owner of SSN 042-68-4425. The response came back stating that SSN 042-68-4425 was “not in file (or never issued) to Barack Obama”. An E-Verify request submitted searching for Obama’s name associated with SSN 042-68-4425, came back as a mismatch: “SSA record does not verify, Other Reason. SSA found a discrepancy in the record.” So while the SSN database clearly showed Barack Obama used SSN 042-68-4425, the response to the verification request showed it was never issued to him; and the E-Verify request independently confirmed that Obama’s name was never legally associated with SSN 042-68-4425.

    What about Harrison J. Bounel? Harry Bounel did in fact exist. A document from the 1940 census showed Harrison J. Bounel resided in Bronx, NY and was 50 years old at the time, making Harry Bounel’s birth year 1890. A FOIA discovery request (submitted in September of 2012) for SSA records of Harry Bounel and SSN 042-68-4425 was denied, stating “… disclosing this information would be a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, and the FOIA (5 U.S.C. & 552(b) (6)) does not require disclosure.”

    So why did Barack Obama use a dead guy’s SSN when he applied to college? Because when you apply to most colleges you need a SSN, and without a valid birth certificate you can’t get one. The Social Security Administration began requiring all applicants to provide proof of age, identity, and citizenship in the 1970s.

    Summarized from this article:

    • Kris Johanson says:

      I guess that means anything he did as Senator is now null and void, b/c U.S. Senator also has a citizenship threshold

    • Bob G says:

      Stop your crazy birther poo! Obama is ,,,uummm, is our Savior! Who knew that attacking American business for 8 years would lead to a stagnant economy!? We didn’t know that till the genius Barry did that. (ok, yes us smarter folks knew that, but never mind that…) Long live Barry! (the lying moron who fooled a plurality of Americans). In a normal world a jail cell would be Barry’s next residence…but standards have fallen, sadly….

    • Squidly says:

      Interesting factoid:

      Prior to 1961 SSA field offices issued new SSNs. Only a fraction of these SSN assignments were screened at the central office for a previously assigned SSN, and then only manually (Long 1993, 84). Thus, issuing duplicate SSNs was possible. Beginning in 1961, the central office in Baltimore issued all new SSNs, but it was not until 1970 that an electronic method of checking for previously issued SSNs (called “EVAN” for “electronic verification of alleged numbers”) was devised (SSA 1990, 4). Today, automated systems with sophisticated matching routines screen for previously issued SSNs.

      Although, for the record, I do not believe Obama was born in Hawaii. Every person on my father’s side of my family has been born in Hawaii since 1850 (long before Hawaii was a State, and many since). There isn’t a person in my family that has a birth certificate (full form) that looks anything like what has been presented as Obama’s “birth certificate”. What has been present as Obama’s “birth certificate” is nothing more than the modern (and current) version of their “certificate of live birth”, which has really no correlation to an actual “birth certificate”. I have both my long form “birth certificate” and “certificate of live birth” of my birth in Washington State in 1962. They were completely different documents in Washington State as well. I have seen my father’s long form birth certificate from Hawaii in 1942, and it looks nothing like that either. Granted, in 1942 Hawaii was not yet a State (became a State in March 1959), birth certificates were different. However, post 1959, US Citizens residing in Hawaii were reissued a new birth certificate under a new format. That format also does not look anything like Obama’s “certificate of live birth”.

  15. Alley says:

    If you think Obama was born in Kenya because someone someone once printed (then corrected) something, then you’re probably going to believe that 1,000s of climate scientists are hiding a hoax, and people who take simple temperature averages without regard to adjustments know what’s going on.

    This site reminds me of Limbaugh, then Beck, now Alex Jones. You will believe anything as long as it makes you feel better.

    How did the birth announcements get into the Hawaii papers? Answer: people do that all the time case their child runs for POTUS decades later.

    • Gator says:

      If you think this post is about Obama being born in Kenya, because Tony simply posted Obama’s own bio which claimed for 17 years that he was indeed born in Kenya, then you should believe everything that Obama tells you.

      Obama is the original birther, or not. You decide.

      • Squidly says:

        Interesting little tidbit. Obama attended the same private school (Punahou) that my father and his brother attended (my father is almost 21 years older than Obama however).

        Obama once wrote his name in wet cement on a Punahou sidewalk .. quote: “King Obama” .. which I believe is still there today.

        My entire family on my father’s side have been born and raised in Hawaii since 1850.

        Personally, I have seen virtually all of the evidence, arguments, what have you, on the subject of where Obama was born. I personally do not believe there is any way he was born in Hawaii. Too many of his own family members claim his was born in Kenya (along with all of the other evidence).

        So, call me a “birther”, I don’t care. It is incumbent upon Obama to prove he was born in the United States, and in fact born to parents that were US citizens the time. Even if you believe Obama was born in Hawaii, there is no dispute that his father was not a US Citizen, and therefore Obama still did not meet the Constitutional requirements to run for the Presidency of the United States of America.

        The entire “where Obama was born” is nothing more than a distraction. He was never Constitutionally eligible to run for office in the first place, regardless of where he was born.

        • Gator says:

          Can’t argue with you. Not sure why anyone would, unless they are either uber Obama nuts or simply media-cleansed sheeple.

        • Richard Greene says:

          Don’t be a nit-wit Squidly.
          Obama’s mother was a US citizen.
          Obama is a US citizen automatically,
          no matter where he was born.

          John MCain was born in the
          Panama Canal Zone, but he is
          still a US citizen, and was eligible
          to be the US president too.

          Obama was an awful president,
          and McCain is one of the most
          annoying Republicans in history.

          There is enough to complain about
          and no need to make yourself
          look like a fool, by claiming Obama
          was “never Constitutionally
          eligible to run for office”.

          You are entitled to your own opinions,
          but not to your own “facts”.

          • Disillusioned says:

            I don’t believe you understood what Squidly was saying. Cannot you be a US citizen and not eligible to be President?

          • AndyG55 says:

            The Panama Canal Zone (Spanish: Zona del Canal de Panamá) was an unincorporated territory of the United States from 1903 to 1979,

            McCain was born in a USA Territory.

            US Presidents must be born in the USA, McCain was.

            If Obama was born in Kenya, he most definitely was not eligible. (unknown)

            So, Richard… You are entitled to your own opinions,

            but not to your own “facts”.

          • Disillusioned says:


            To clarify my quick post earlier, I didn’t think Squidly claimed, nor implied Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen.

            You mentioned John McCain. I never understood the issue being with the John McCain (or George Romney) instances (of a child born out of the country to two parents who are U.S. citizens). According to the Naturalization Act of 1790, I believe they are considered “natural-born” U.S. citizens (as opposed to naturalized U.S. citizens).

            The unresolved issue seems to be with Presidential candidates who have one parent that is not a U.S. citizen – the child is a “naturalized” U.S. citizen. The Constitution says the bar for eligibility of POTUS is that the child must be a “natural born” U.S. citizen.

            So, when reading Squidly’s post, it seemed to me Squidly was focusing on the fact that Barack Obama’s supposed father was a British national from Kenya.

            (Digression ahead – To muddy the water a little bit more, some believe, and it’s not all that far-fetched, that Barack Obama’s real father is indeed a U.S. citizen – Frank Marshall Davis.)

            The still-unresolved issue of naturalized vs. natural born has some real problems. It seems practically resolved by precedent. Chester A. Arthur’s dad was a British national at the time of his birth. A few other recent POTUS candidates were born with one or more parents who were not a US citizen at the time of birth. Neither of Marco Rubio’s or Bobby Jindal’s parents were U.S. citizens. Although both gentlemen were born in the U.S., I think the question that arises is whether they naturalized U.S. citizens or natural born U.S. citizens, and do they qualify to run for POTUS.

            Ted Cruz’s situation is a little more complicated. He was born in Canada, and his father was Cuban national when he was born. The question is not whether Cruz is U.S. citizen, but whether he is a naturalized U.S. citizen, or a natural born U.S. citizen.

            In the past, I have read and watched compelling arguments on both sides of this debate (I admit I have forgotten more than I remember, and I reserve the right to be wrong in my recollection).
            But, it never seemed very cut and dried for either side of the debate, and some have suggested that SCOTUS should make a final ruling to clear this mess up. Until then, I think it’s going to keep coming up.

            Again, I never understood Squidly’s argument to be that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen. The squirrel isn’t in that tree.

          • Gator says:

            FS-545 “Certification of Birth”. I had to have one to prove my citizenship. The law is very complex, but this was the judgement of the Department of State right after Obama was elected. This is not my opinion.

            Again, I only wanted to go to Mexico.

          • RAH says:


            I have never understood the controversy. The US code makes it clear to me.


          • Disillusioned says:

            RAH said: “I have never understood the controversy. The US code makes it clear to me. ”

            Thank you. The code makes clear what nationals and citizens of United States are. But, that’s not where the arguments lie. The arguments (or “controversy” as you put it) surrounds which citizens can and cannot be POTUS (specifically what is a “natural born US citizen”). The US code does not address that term.

  16. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    Alley a.k.a. ‘Astroturf’:
    Tony Heller and most of the people who comment here present factual data and evidence. They put up or shut up. You’re welcome to do the same if you can.

  17. garyh845 says:

    Without offering an opinion – but all on this page was indeed interesting – let’s remember when and from who the “Birther Movement” was birthed. Right smack during the middle of the dirty, ugly and contentious 2008 Democrat party primary race between Obama and Hillary Clinton. There are more detailed pieces than this one, and since this was published more information has come forward (like Sid Blumenthal’s emails pushing for them to use the birther angle against Obama); but for the moment, just note that this is written by committed leftie John Avlon and published in the Daily Beast, back in 2010.

    The ‘Birthers’ Began on the Left

    That our national media simply looked the other way, while continuing to pound on Republicans, and Trump. Even worse, I never heard a competent rebuttal out of any Republican saying that it was started and pursued by the racist Democrats who supported Hillary, over Obama.

    Obama’s mom was a US Citizen, and best I can tell, that makes him a US citizen.

    • Gator says:

      Not quite that simple.

      About ten years ago I needed a new passport and contacted the Department of State after being informed my citizenship was in question. A little background first. I was born to two married US citizens in France, my father was an Air Force officer (seventh generation Floridian) and my mother’s family has been here for over three hundred years. Dad was on active duty and stationed at Deols AFB, and he and my mother had been married for over eight years at the time of my birth. I had provided the Feds with original BC’s (have three), an FS-545 “Certification of Birth” issued by the Department of State, expired passports and my original FS-240 “REPORT OF BIRTH ABROAD OF A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, issued by the American Embassy in Paris. I also provided documentation regarding my renunciation of any French citizenship that was required when I signed up for Selective Service on my eighteenth birthday. None of this was acceptable.

      I was told the only way to prove my citizenship was to provide the Department of State my original embossed copy of an AA-311301 “CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP” that was issued by the Department of Justice. Thankfully my parents had read an article about the “Immigration and Nationalization Act” section 301(a) effective Dec 24th 1952, which applies to Obama as well as me, and then made the trip to the DOJ office in Atlanta to obtain my AA-311301.
      According to the Department of State, and the Department of Justice, without an original AA-301311 Obama is not able to prove US citizenship.

      All I was asking for was a trip to Mexico.

  18. garyh845 says:

    FTR – I wasn’t suggesting that it’s all that simple; rather, how dangerous our national mainstream media is (and how stupid Republicans are, that they can’t even bring up a valid point to challenge that media).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.