Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Kerr on Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explains what is going on
- Gordon Vigurs on New Video : Pretzel Logic
- Rory Forbes on New Video : Pretzel Logic
- Rory Forbes on New Video : Pretzel Logic
- Bob G on CNN/BLM/ANTIFA Attack On The US Capitol
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
New Video : “The Earth Began In 1960”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
At around 6 minutes Tony says that Zeke started his graph, at a low point. While the rest of the graph supports the fraud Zeke may have intended, Tony’s words are confusing since he stressed that Zeke started at a low point. In fact, Zeke should have started at a high point. Perhaps he started where he did so as to be not quite so obvious? Either way, Tony’s narration is confusing. Had the graph been for temperature instead of sea ice, Tony’s narration would have made sense.
He started after the warm period which melted the sea ice was over, and at the beginning of the cold period when the sea ice rapidly grew.
I said exactly what I intended to say. He cherry-picked a cold period to start the graph. I am not comparing ice extent – rather I am using ice as a proxy for temperature.
Your last sentence is the point that isn’t clear in the video; I, too, was confused at that point in the video. I think it would have been clearer if the sea ice extent had not been brought up, just the fact that Zeke cherry picked his starting point, or perhaps National Geo did, for reporting temperature trend.
I just found it a bit confusing since it seems a better point to start would have been the following peak in ice which must have corresponded to a lower temperature. Maybe I just got confused but the ice chart instead of it being a temperature chart. His warming trend would then have been much more exaggerated. I’m only nit picking since any small discretion would be exploited by those who might wish to refute your assertions. I know that there are “valid explanations” for everything that’s being done to the historical data. He who controls the data controls the conclusions. Your work has really ruined any chance I may have had of believing the “Climate Change Narrative.”
Your remark on creationism is spot on, and even they aren’t buying it. Had the Nye Ham debate back in 2014 been about climate change, it would’ve been like this…
Ham: The world is four billion years old and robust…
Nye: No! It’s six thousand years old and fragile!
I wish many evolutionists didn’t have such a cognitive dissonance. For shame, Nye and Attenborough. For shame.
Another great video–you must really be getting under their skin Tony. Have you seen this “debunking” response?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjPkclkZh6o&feature=youtu.be
A mildly skeptical teenager with some critical thinking skills could see that nothing was debunked, just deflection and more AGW assertions. Incredible to see how desperate they are getting. Thanks for the great work.