Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Another great video Tony sums up much of what you’ve been saying recently.
Yesterday watched yours and Tim Ball’s presentations in Sydney three years ago. Glad you can have a sense of humour in your presentation when the whole subject is so serious as we’re deluded by the MSM, governments, etc. Tim’s too was excellent and being the first I’d heard of him I looked him up to note he’s from here, Manitoba, although I see he now lives in Victoria. I guess he’s prepared for the much warming on Vcr. Island, or perhaps that’s cooling, hang on which way IS the climate going anyway!
Not to be a nag, but … you’re not going to post yesterday’s excellent video “4089 Days Until The End Of The Planet” on your website? (I just watched it again!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koxdc06wET4
“The Bureau of Meteorology has been accused of changing temperature records to fit a “global warming agenda” by a Queensland Liberal senator.
Senator Gerard Rennick refused to back down from his attack on the weather’s bureau record-keeping practices during questioning of his past scepticism towards the federal agency on Sky News on Monday.”
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/liberal-senator-doubles-down-on-accusing-bom-of-changing-records-to-fit-climate-agenda
Great one, Tony! Thanks!
At about 9 minutes in, Tony shows a graph where NASA changed the data to eliminate a “sea level rise hiatus.” However, earlier Tony showed tide gauge records indicating that sea level rise has been liner for 170 years. How could there have been a hiatus when rise has been linear? Honestly, it looks like NASA fixed an error in the original graph (black line) since the “corrected” red line looks more or less linear.
The hiatus was Hanson’s data on sea level rise worldwide. The Tidal Guage information was just for one location. Each graph he was showing was for a different location
A short “hiatus” of 20 years won’t invalidate a linear fit over a 170 year time scale. The black line would still have a linear fit possible, it won’t be as good of a fit as the red line. If you look closely at the single location tide gauge a 6:41 for new york, you can see the “hiatus” in there. With many more data points in this plot the “hiatus” becomes even less of a factor in the linear fit. The variability month to month makes short term trends less damaging to the long term fit for lack of better words.
Thanks B. That makes sense.
Great news, Tony! This video has been positively commented by Terry Moore! For those of you who don’t know, Moore runs a pet supply shop in England. Before you say “big deal”, that’s just his PUBLIC business. His PRIVATE business is running the Cat Survival Trust for Endangered Species, his backyard turned wildlife sanctuary. Before you go visit, I should warn you that you need his permission to gain access. Anyway, it’s great that a real British environmentalist sees right through the XR.
http://www.catsurvivaltrust.org/
Cheers
Thank you again for keeping at exposing this fraud. Great work.
However, keep at the science, while repeating exposing prior media propaganda, pure science and data better than just saying old newspapers and mag forcasts got it wrong.
Would not mind to see something on why top of atmosphere outgoing long wave radiation has been rising when by global warming theory the stuff reflected or radiated off earth is theoretically being more absorbed by tropospheric CO2 in 14 µm wavelength band and top of atmosphere OLW should be falling, smoking gun opposite.
I do not understand why earth’s stratosphere cooling rapidly (RSS data) when more OLW, puzzle.
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/cgi-bin/data/timeseries/timeseries.pl?ntype=1&var=OLR&level=2000&lat1=90&lat2=-90&lon1=0&lon2=0&iseas=1&mon1=0&mon2=0&iarea=0&typeout=2&Submit=Create+Timeseries
http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html (hit TLS channel)
See https://www.climatesciencejournal.com/ , JPinBalt , to understand why the Greenhouse Gas theory is invalid science.
I took a very quick look at the link, and I’m disappointed. The author conflates the energy >storedabsorbed< by H2O, CO2 and other "greenhouse gases".
Greenhouse gases are any that can absorb infrared radiation (IR). This directly causes only these molecules to vibrate, but this energy is transferred indirectly to other atmospheric molecules by intermolecular collisions, so the whole atmosphere warms up.
I'm not quite sure what to make of his discussion about the thermophysics of Rayleigh scattering.
The principle of greenhouse warming IS competent science (at least in principle). Understandably, there's an inclination to trash the good along with the bad when so much has been corrupted, but sceptical examination is a healthier course than wholesale book-burning.
I say keep up exposing the fraud of climate change with the old and very relevant news articles and the steady references to the reasonable and reliable datasets, while exposing the failed forecasts of their charlatans from manipulated data. This deception is not founded on science and its principles and will be further confounded by science so called. Hopefully reasonable people who seek truth are being empowered to expose and prevent the gain of power and control of those who lie and oppress.
The 142 year old record for Norfolk County, Ontario fell by a whopping 2.6 C to a new low of -10.6 C on Tuesday. Our minister of environment Catherine McKenna says we have a climate emergency. I guess so! What should she do about it? Dump soot on the Arctic?
The term “fossil fuel” is outdated. Crude oil is now proven to be made from hydrocarbons deep in the earth and is a geological process. Don’t nreed no desad dinosaurs. I’m not sure about coal, i’m looking into that.
http://viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html
Love your site! hey, but isn’t acid rain a real thing? It decimated the fish in the Adirondacks near where I live.
Bob, I agree re: the abiotic origin of petroleum. A lot of evidence supports it. Coal, on the other hand, is a horse of a different color. It’s dead plants.