New Video : Climate Math

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to New Video : Climate Math

  1. Toto's Fan says:

    I enjoyed this video twice as much as any other that has given me double satisfaction.
    No wonder there are two of those trusty Totos.
    On a serious note, this video is an absolute gem. Is the math from quantum mechanics?

  2. D. Boss says:

    Climate math at it’s finest! Every supposed journalist is twice as fake as the next one!

    I think you are channeling Mark Twain! (Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics)

    I wish we could somehow get these videos on mainstream broadcasting as PSA’s – a few times a week.

    As an effort to deprogram the masses from this absurd cult of catastrophe.

  3. Scarface says:

    Hi Tony,

    Thank you for another good example of the climate idiocy.

    I have a question. You seem to be able to find all kind of meteorological data.
    Could you maybe find the data about Amsterdam Island?

    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/87194/amsterdam-island
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Île_Amsterdam

    It’s very remote. And it apparantly has a meteorological station.
    There is no influence of any significant land mass.
    It’s 2000 miles away from everything: Africa, Australia and Antartic.

    I’m very curious about trends in temperature, sea level, etc.
    Hope you will take a look!

  4. G W Smith says:

    Great one, Tony! The truth can really be hilarious! Sad, but… hilarious.

  5. The lawnmower man says:

    I am just reassured that most of the earth is therefore warming at half the rate of the other most of the earth.

  6. Richard C. Skidmore says:

    How is subsidence factored into the NOAA sea level graphs?
    Is the subsidence happening at the same steady rate as the sea level rise?

  7. MrGrimnasty says:

    Another repetitive example of fraud is naturally subsiding river deltas – maybe even as much as 8″ a year in places (and/or with other man-made activities like ground water/oil/gas extraction, and river engineering works that are altering silt deposit/erosion), and pretending <3mm p.a. of sea level rise/climate change is to blame.

    The BBC has lied about the Mississippi, Ganges and Mekong to my knowledge.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p076qcb3
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-india-47560991/sinking-island-in-the-sundarbans-delta
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-49854753/the-displaced-climate-change-in-vietnam-destroying-family-life

  8. mcgatlin says:

    A real scorcher! My indignation sinks and my anger subsides at the utter absurdity so perfectly portrayed as the peaks of my icy disillusionment melt into mirth

    and so I can sleep at night

    thanks to you Mr Heller highwater!

    Wishing you all the best in return!

  9. If almost everywhere temperatures are rising twice as fast as the rest of the world then the temperature rise must be zero. 2 x 0 = 0.

  10. Robert Gipson says:

    Even more terrifying: Greenland is melting seven (7) times faster:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IegLor-1khs

  11. Robert Gipson says:

    The following video is about the “dark matter” hoax. However, interestingly, if you scroll forward to 4:50, note that the speaker may just as well be talking about anthropogenic global warming:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oea8AG23j0

    • D. Boss says:

      Excellent link. Climate (non) science isn’t the only branch that has many or most fundamental precepts incorrect. And the same crony, groupthink, “consensus” behavior works all over.

      The difference between the incorrect physics elsewhere and the climate horse schist, is the climate fiasco has much darker or even evil motivations behind it. That is to destroy western civilization/capitalism and replace it with a socialist/communist/totalitarian utopia.

      What better way to destroy the present system than to outlaw or prohibit the essential energy required to run it?

      Majority of folks who have been duped or brainwashed into supporting this nonsense about Climate Catastrophe, should ask themselves: Who or What am I serving or supporting here?

      Here is some pertinent info on just what the statements and “fruits” of the greens really are:

      https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/04/14/hypothesis-radical-greens-are-the-great-killers-of-our-age/

      The whole article is worth reading, however pay special attention to the quotes listed in section 8 of the above article.

      And it concludes with the following:
      “The number of deaths and shattered lives caused by radical-green activism since ~1970 rivals the death tolls of the great killers of the 20th Century – Stalin, Hitler and Mao – they advocate similar extreme-left totalitarian policies and are indifferent to the resulting environmental damage and human suffering.”

      • Robert Gipson says:

        Thanks. It happens that that I’ve been a vocal critic of “dark matter” and similar baseless theories (e.g., “string”) for some time. Not just to be argumentative, but after hard critical analysis, whereupon these theories just fall apart. It’s not my intention to conflate these topics with the AGW hoax, but the speaker so aptly nails a large part of the motivation behind so-called “scientists” who at heart are prostitutes, suck-ups to Big Money, the antithesis of science. The Emperor has no clothes.

        • Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

          I did a little of Dave’s reading. Maybe there’s truth to autodynamics (keyword being “maybe”), but expanding planet? Even creationists know that’s whack! If we are going to end the climate scam, we need to be clearer about what we’re up against. Socialism? It seems to me our enemies are capitalists like everyone else, but hey, some animals are more equal than others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.