Thank you!

People have been extremely generous this month, and are making it possible for me to not work, and do what I want to do with climate. I have been focused on content, and have not done a good job thanking people individually. Working on that today.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

108 Responses to Thank you!

  1. Matt D says:

    why did you remove commenting abilities on your youtube channel?
    comment sections are so much fun, regardless of the opinions of the commenters

    • Bill Charleston says:

      An email from one of the nutcases trying to force YOUTUBE to censor Tony from a group called AVAAZ. The AVAAZ nutcases want to tell us what is truth and along the way, they want to SILENCE TONY HELLER and others.

      Let’s flood YouTube and its main advertisers with our report findings, then surround YouTube’s headquarters with mobile billboards, engage their employees and keep up the pressure until they stop promoting lies to millions!

      YouTube: STOP promoting lies

      When searching for “global warming” and “climate change” Avaaz researchers found that the YouTube algorithm was throwing up misinformation videos, that racked up millions of views. The videos claimed scientists are liars, climate change “isn’t real” and global warming is a “hoax”!

      The Guardian, TIME and influential media outlets across the world have reported about our findings – and insiders tell us that YouTube’s executives are feeling the heat from the massive media wave.

      But if we let go now, the media wave will die down and things could go back to normal. We can’t allow that to happen, in a time when the climate crisis is worsening and we need a fact-based global discussion to find the solutions that save us all.

      So let’s up the ante, by showing YouTube that millions want them to act – and get both major advertisors as well as the companies employees on board to make them change course. Sign now, then read our report and share it with all your friends:

      Avaaz is a 55-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

      • JSMill says:

        I’m very happy to report I managed to get a particularly VILE critic in trouble on Twitter … I think I speak for a whole lot of us – this work is extremely valuable, time consuming, and a lightning rod for the worst kind of attacks. Let’s ALL keep an eye out for unfair attacks, and report report report. RealSqueakyWheels with these companies, folks….

  2. Matt D says:

    also, Hello from Aurora!
    Thanks for your tireless efforts. Imagine how many views you would get if those pesky communists weren’t adjusting algorithms and suppressing views!

    • Mark Raymond says:

      Hello, can you say more about the link between communism and people who publish data on climate change? I’m genuinely curious.

      • Max D says:

        Mark, greetings.

        These “scientists”, “journalists”, “academics”, and “politicians” are nothing more than bolshevik revolutionaries who want government to take full control of the average human lifecycle. It is full spectrum dominance. Whether they are all true believers or useful idiots is beyond my knowledge, but regardless they appeal to groupthink and confirmation bias, so they are at least, unwittingly assisting in the formation of world goverment.

        I’ll provide some quotes, but a great place to start researching is to investigate Maurice Strong, the Georgia Guidestones, Paul Erlich, etc. All of these people and items are severely anti-human, which is what this has always been about, and the same applies to communism. This is merely a tool to procure world communism:

        At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

        “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

        Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

        Climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth.
        Ottmar Edenhofer , UN IPCC “official”

        The question is who is responsible for designing, implementing, and relentlessly pushing for the dissolution of private property, aka communism? Interesting though that the ruling elites in communism get full access to property and luxuries like butter, transport, etc. Think AOC and Bernie, Gore, Bloomberg, DiCaprio, Greta…

        Do as I say, not as I do. Just like the fake scientists, fraud michael mann. These people are in the protected class. The establishment, and they dare not speak out against anything faulty in it, lest they be excommunicated like Dr. Peter Ridd, Dr. Susan Crockford, Judith Curry, Mark Steyn, Eric Weinstein (slightly different but still same idea). The Hydra Mark.

        and of course, the harlot is now on board:

        • Billy Kidd says:

          Well done, Max D

        • Bruce Williams says:

          Well said Max, but I’d like to add one comment to your great reply. Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t it the Catholic Church that imprisoned (house arrest) Galileo?

          The new Church of Climate Alarmism seems to be hell bent on silencing all of it’s critics, much like they did with Galileo.

      • Billy Kidd says:

        Let me share a little something I found quite compelling. Fair warning, it’s one based on nothing more than connecting dots, lots of dots.
        So in the modern vernacular a conspiracy theory.
        The following is a list of people who’ve played a major players in our nation’s history.


        In the Revolutionary War, the British hired the mercenary army known as the Hessians. Highly skilled fighters, with a well known reputation for bravery, skill, fearlessness, and ruthlessness.
        Karl Marx, author of the Communist Manifesto. A little known fact about Lincoln and Marx. Karl was a contributory for ten years, in Lincoln’s paper of choice, The New York Tribune. Horace Greeley, was himself a socialist and a close friend of Lincoln. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
        Abraham Kuhn arrived in the states in 1840.
        Shortly after, Solomon Loeb would follow. KUHN, LOEP, and COMPANY.
        In 1848 the revolutionaries of Europe would make their presence known, in a big way. Anywhere from 30 to 50,000 , depending on the source. They were instrumental in Lincoln’s successful run for the presidency. Better known as the 48’ers. Several of them would become generals in the Union Army. And knew Marx personally.
        Joseph Seligman, Marcus Goldman (yes that Goldman), Otto Hermann.
        Almost without exception, they all came from the state of Hesse. Solomon Loep and Marx came from the town of Worns.
        This is only a cursory look thus far.
        Full disclosure, I love connecting dots, obviously.

        Okay, what does this have to do with your question. If you agree that this shouldn’t be taken too lightly. The communist are a false construct and a bigger part of a GLOBAL CONSPIRACY. In my humble opinion. None Dare Call It Conspiracy, is a older book that is still relevant today. You can find it online for free.

        I realize this isn’t a real good answer to your query I thought I would over it as food for thought. PEACE, friend

      • Billy Kidd says:

        To moderator I believe I inadvertently sent a bad email link. Please, note and post, thank you, Billy

  3. Alfred Strauch says:

    Last year was very cold in Canada. Can you provide a review of the annual temperature levels so that the temperature cannot be manipulated by the others.

  4. GeologyJim says:

    Tony –

    People are being generous because you are generating great content and analysis. You are also clearly effective because you are receiving flak from the usual sources. Great job!!

    I set up a monthly contribution of $100, so that ought to cover beer and puppy chow at least ??. Gotta feed Toto!

    • HollyinFla says:

      That’s fantastic Jim… I would if I could, but I can’t. I sure am grateful for people like you who can, and do!

    • Greatful for your your donation to Tony from the UK very kind, also helps feed some sense into the climate scare

    • Bruce Williams says:

      Thank you Jim! I too would like to contribute, but have been unemployed for four years now and my budget is pretty thin. I want you to know how much I appreciate your contribution to Tony’s work.

  5. Dear Tony,

    Thank you so much! Individuals like you who care very much about the environment are not only very refreshing but inspirational as well! If there are 100 items important to climate change, i.e. economic climate, political climate, social climate, environmental climate and just weather-like climate, etc…, they all are important but we certainly do not have to lie about carbon dioxide to get positive change done. The whole damn world is doing it. It’s silly. And we need to stop it!

    Thank you so much for your great work and determination!



  6. Mats Rosengren says:

    Dear Tony
    At some time I found on your homepage that you use data from “DAILY GLOBAL HISTORICAL CLIMATOLOGY NETWORK (GHCN-DAILY)” that can be found on
    I downloaded the data and used it for several computations like for example
    In one of your latest YouTube contributions you displayed similar historical data for Australia! Is there a similar FTP site with historical Australian temperature readings? Sure, I tried Google but only found
    There must be something better with ALL data that you are using yourself and which I did not find!
    Large appreciation for your excellent work!

  7. Russell Cook says:

    Alas, no donation from me because I’m still at a sub-poverty level of existence, and this year I’ve had to live about 99% on my dwindling savings while continuing my GelbspanFiles blog work. I’ve already easily thanked my donors because there have been that few of ’em (which includes a weeks-old switch to a free room & board housing arrangement courtesy of family members). My living expenses will be better for the duration, and my fortunes may change in the next year, too, if anyone big decides to go after the main characters who’ve been pushing the false ‘Big Oil-funded skeptics’ accusation.

  8. Don Gaetano says:

    I am a very small contributor at this point, regrettably.
    I’ll say, “the workman is worthy of his labors.” Thanks Tony for all you’re doing.

  9. Matt D says:

    4 comments, 3 responses. Why did you not approve my previous comment about youtube comment ability removal?

    I was kind and thankful for your work, but simply asked a question. Why would that be censored? I am very thankful for your continued efforts, which was essential in the journey from true believer to climate realist…but that is all unrelated to censorship.

    I would hope that you would recognize the danger of censorship, considering the topic you cover and how anything skeptical of the official priesthood narrative is essentially censored.

  10. Matt D says:

    oh bother. It appears it never submitted? Please delete this and my previous comments outside of the first comment. I made a significant error, considering you are probably busy and just haven’t gotten around to moderating. My apologies.

    although I still wonder why you disabled youtube comments

  11. Don Beckett says:

    You’re doing a great job spreading the message on the global warming myth. Surely those is power must wake up soon, as the evidence demonstrates their fraud.
    Here in NZ our leftist government is trying to force us to “lead the world” in becoming carbon neutral by various means – they have stopped any further mining of coal and cancelled oil/gas exploration permits – all this when with a population of 5 million people, we account for something like 0.04% of world carbon emissions, if even that. What a bunch of tossers they are.
    Keep up the good work.

  12. James Snook says:

    It is such a relief to know that you are at least able to continue your important work into 2020. Small donation sent – you must not be silenced.

  13. Neil Vokes says:

    Keep up the great work! Have you seen this video on YouTube which appeared yesterday – it examines the use of temperature “anomalies” : “The Top Climate Crisis Scam of 2019”

  14. Jim says:

    I downloaded your app–Thanks!
    It appears to be unusable however because one could legitimately dismiss its results by saying: “Of course it shows a decline. As more stations have been brought online, it shows that the average station latitude has moved northward, which would move the average temperature lower; and it shows that the average station elevation has moved higher, which would move the average temperature lower.”

  15. Seeking truth says:

    Happy new year Tony. I recently started reading about the climate change debate looking for answers as a concerned non scientist citizen (lawyer) and your blog addresses some of the most important questions troubling me. Why do govt websites directly contradict facts alleged by Roy Spencer Judith Curry and the like? Was there a pause or not? Did all these historically hottest years occur in the middle of it? Your startling conclusions need Climategate scale evidence like whistleblower-leaked emails and computer files or congressional or justice dept subpoenas with compliance overseen by appropriate personnel not involved in the alleged misconduct. It is only that kind of evidence that can alter the course of this climate emergency juggernaut. This is very important muckraking work.

  16. Bob says:

    Q regarding volcanic activity, specially ocean floor activity. Admittedly I have only done a very superficial scan, what I have found troubles me that most scientific work concentrates on land based volcanic activity and even more specifically aerosols.

    I found a “Scientists believe that 80 percent of the volcanic eruptions on Earth take place in the ocean. Most of these volcanoes are thousands of feet deep, and difficult to find.” (

    It is a hugely difficult task to monitor volcanoes thousands of feet below the surface. How can anyone claim credit to modeling ocean CO2 gassing without better understanding magnitude and effects of magma outflows which could be 80% of volcanic activity?

    El Niño and La Niña are difficult to predict in timing and magnitude which further suggests caution when claiming model accuracy.

  17. Scott says:

    No, Tony, THANK YOU! The pleasure is all OURS! :)

    Given the time of year, how about two differently slanted snow survey reports based on the same data from Phillips Station. Of course the dour sounding LA Times report quotes the obligatory climate change mantra, as uttered by the chief snow surveyor. I’m certain he’s a well-qualified and informed scientist. Maybe not. Meanwhile, the Sac Bee report celebrates the data:

    latimes dot com/california/story/2020-01-02/california-snowpack-measurement-2020-boosted-recent-storms

    sacbee dot com/news/weather-news/article226925759 dot html

  18. Stuart London says:

    More evidence of climate change. This from the court papers of Henry VIII January 1528 [*my comment in parentheses]

    3761. SCARCITY.
    Considerations as to the dearness of all manner of victuals:—
    1. The King’s foreign wars, which have continued for two or three years, have been one cause of dearth. 2. The year that the war ended there was as great a rot and murrain among cattle as has been seen for 40 years before … 3. There have been three or four marvellously dry summers, which produced surfeits *[execess numbers] among the cattle and sheep, owing to the scarcity of grass and lack of hay and water. In many parts of England cattle had to be driven five or six miles to water, a thing that had not been seen by any man now living. 4. Owing to this there were little or no fat cattle in the common fields from Michaelmas to Martylmas, as there usually are. 5. The lack of fodder has prevented husbandmen from breeding lambs or calves, and those that were bred were hunger bitten, and worth little, except those bred in pasture. 6. In times past, after wars or murrains, the killing of lambs and calves was restrained, but no such order has been made since this dearth began. 7. The great droughts in summer and frosts in winter have destroyed the freshwater fish and fowl in the fens, so that they are at treble their usual price. 8. Pork is very scarce, owing to the dearth of beans, pease, and mast. It was necessary to use pease for the horses and beasts, but, nevertheless, many horses died. 9. The dearth of cattle has also been the cause why all “pultree ware and whit meyte” have been so dear. 10. Regraters and forestallers of cattle have been another cause. In Wales, Cheshire, Lancashire, and the North, where beasts are bred, no grazier can buy either lean or fat beasts, except at third or fourth hand. 11. Notwithstanding all this, “thanked be God, all thing is plentiful at this day as ever it was, and like to be if God send seasonable weathers, also if the pastures at this day may continue, and then can dearth never long continue,” …

  19. CPSJ says:

    Dear Tony,
    It would really help if people could download the various informative videos you post. You Tube and Real appear to be unable to recognise a request or say ‘no video present’. Is there a way?
    Particularly good is the reference back to so many publications, newspapers, reports etc. Do you ever give the URL to the item?
    Keep up the good work – it must be good as I hear no alarmist even begin to argue against facts from long ago. They must be alarmed at such knowledge.


  20. udaiziin says:

    My recurrent payment “failed” with paypal – I made another one but I am guessing paypal is trying to impede your ability to fundraise.

  21. Michael Burgess says:

    So few people control so much…YouTube, PayPal, Google (and other search-engines), Apple and FaceBook….arguably, a handful of folks who disagree with us control our very ability to have honest discourse. What can be done to know we are not being censored at every turn??

    • Ro Blake says:

      Thanks Tony, I appreciate your outspokenness. You may just win in the end.
      I’m a pharmacist and drug developer by trade. I’m an environmentalist and was also a Gore delegate at the 2000 convention. My theories on health care and aging are beginning to get some traction, as well. I’d like to help. Please look at my new website. The first product released will prevent Alzheimer’s disease. Since this is posted publicly, please erase! Thanks.

    • matt D says:

      Revelation 3:9

      know your enemy, and then spread the truth so that they may be stopped.

  22. Pete says:

    Why have you shut off comments on your videos?

  23. Dagmar Becker says:

    Hello Tony,
    are you aware that your January 6th video “NASA confirms their own “conspiracy theory”” is marked by Utube as “made for kids”?
    Instead of the “climate change” badge of honor, a banner appears below the video saying “try Utube for kids” with a button next to it. Honi soit qui mal y pense…
    But when you minimize the video the playback stops. another banner appears saying “miniplayer is off for videos MADE FOR KIDS, tap to resume”.
    Please keep up the good work Tony!

  24. Charlie Clelland says:

    Thanks for all your great work.
    The climate psychos are out and about trying to undermine the idea of multidecadal oscillations in the world’s oceans attributing the data to “noise” and “we know better – because computers”.
    The article starts quite well but then pulls in the controversial Prof (“hockey stick”) Mann and it falls apart pretty badly.

  25. Justsomedad says:

    Thanks for all the hard work Tony. Because today is David Bowie’s birthday I thought it might be appropriate to give his 1971 song “Five Years”a listen. Seems the science was settled even back then.

  26. Bryn Duffy says:

    Thank you, Tony! Your name will be in the history books as someone who pushed back with real data and real scientific skepticism. “How dare you!”

  27. Neal KONNEKER says:

    Thank you for all you do. Please debunk the following:

    I noticed several fallacies and dirty tricks but I’m sure you can do better.

  28. Arno says:

    Hi Tony, is there any way I can get in touch with you? Yesterday BBC has posted this article:

    Some serious errors/deceptions in here. I assume you can see my e-mail from this response if you want to get in touch: Got some interesting data for you.

    Cheers Arno

  29. Rick Hartman says:

    I would happily give you a small monthly donation, as I’m sure would others if you signed up for I support several other creators that way and would gladly add you to that list.


  30. Bart Janssens says:

    Screenshot on Monday (picture). Look at the changed data for 74-75 in table.

  31. Bart Janssens says:

    Old data.

  32. Bart Janssens says:

    Data Monday.

  33. Bart Janssens says:

    Or this one?

  34. Rick M says:

    Great Work!
    Had some issues with Paypal also, but got the donation made.
    A small token of my appreciation.

  35. Raphael says:

    Climate-fears – long time ago:

    The well-known rune stone from Rök in Sweden could have been built according to the latest scientific findings for fear of a climate catastrophe. The rune stone of Rök was built in the ninth century by Vikings near Lake Vättern in southern Sweden. With more than 700 runes, it has the longest known rune inscription on its five sides.
    Science assumes that it was built in memory of a dead son. However, the exact meaning could not be deciphered until today, since parts of the inscription are missing and various rune alphabets were also used. Some scientists believe that the stone speaks of Theodoric the Great, who ruled in the Ostrogothic Empire, today’s Italy, in the sixth century.

    Now researchers from various disciplines at three Swedish universities have presented a new interpretation. They suspect that the author placed his son’s death in a broader context and relates to the danger of another extreme cold period, similar to the dramatic climate change in 536 AD. At that time, a series of volcanic eruptions led to a drastic drop in temperature, poor harvests and famines. It is estimated that around half of the population on the Scandinavian peninsula died.

    According to the researchers, the memory of this drastic event could have been passed down from generation to generation and found its way into mythology. The battles mentioned on the stone could not be actual fighting, but the “conflict between light and dark, heat and cold, life and death”, write the scientists.

    In the ninth century, there were also a number of events that could have “extremely threatened” the author. “A strong solar storm colored the sky in dramatic shades of red, the harvest suffered from an extremely cold summer, and later there was a solar eclipse,” said Bo Graslund, professor of archeology at Uppsala University. This could have raised the fear of a so-called fimbul winter. The Fimbul winter describes in the Nordic mythology an ice age with three severe winters, which Ragnarök, the downfall of the gods, ushered in.

  36. Kevin Clowers says:

    I can find no language to convey my appreciation and esteem for your ongoing efforts here. You are absolutely a star and I commend you in the strongest terms I can find. Thank You truly.

  37. Michael Wood says:


    I sent my first small donation to you last month. I will be sending another on Friday this week ( my next pension day)
    Have you a moment to pass comment on this please?
    It seems so extreme, I don’t know what to think!

  38. David Terrie says:


    I was listening to the Scott Adams podcast today and he repeated a claim that due to the ocean being warmer in some places than others we’d see more see level rise in some places and less in others, all else being equal (paraphrase of course). He also noted that a finance guy from Black Rock was concerned about rising oceans and that this might have a big impact on the loan market. Big claim. This got me thinking about how much difference it would make and I found this site:

    It has volume increasing by .000522 if the ocean warmed 1 degree from its current temperature. This would seem to make his claim effectively bunk. It also got me thinking about the fact that melting ice shrinks in volume.

    This might be a good topic to tackle. If anyone could ferret out the truth, it would be you.

  39. Caroline says:

    Hello Tony, and warmest congratulations from Hamburg, Germany (14° C at midday, 15 January 2020). Here we have just been told “Klimahysterie” (climate hysteria) has been chosen as the un-word of 2019.
    I need your advice please, and am sending this as a comment as maybe others can help too:
    I was fascinated by your graph-making software and tried to get it going on my macbook, but although the data was processed no graph came up. When I typed the command line you mentioned into the terminal window, I got this:
    Carolines-MBP:ghcnd_hcn carolinexyz$ python3 US.txt summer text=”USHCN”
    xcrun: error: invalid active developer path (/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun
    … On the other hand, the .exe file on my Windows 7 partition worked beautifully. What step have I missed on the Mac?
    Many thanks! Caroline

  40. the_perk says:

    Saw this article about the smoke from the Australian bushfires making a full circuit around the globe on a business/job networking site today. Reading the comments made my eyes roll. Thought you might be able to use it as fodder.

  41. David Smith says:

    Hey Tony,

    Really enjoy your videos! Thought you might be interested in a “Climate Action Speaker Event” titled: Defining radical in the age of humans. Speaker is Rob Davies (PHD, Physics Professor, Utah State University. The event is being held at Colorado Mountain College in Breckenridge January 24 at 7pm.

  42. Kevin says:

    Great job Tony, please keep up the good work, we need to shut these climate alarmist nutters down, they refuse to accept science and the historical record..

  43. James Gates says:

    I thought you would find this interesting. Thank you for your efforts.

  44. Martin says:

    Tony, if you haven’t seen this, this is full of wonderful DATA from Dr. Willie Soon:

  45. john dawson says:

    hi Tony I’m a great fan of your work I’ve noticed how even my great BBC is selective in it’s message example Dec 2019 Venice Italy record floods (attributed to global warming) but the empty canals 1 month later Jan 2020 are due to low tides no mention of global cooling!

  46. Andy Marks says:

    Hi Tony
    Please rebut Mallen Baker (again!) who says, Yes, CO2 is heat-saturated, but only close to Earth’s surface. In the upper atmosphere, he says, something or other happens (magic?) to negate this saturation. (It seems like so much straw-clutching) He cloaks himself in the garment of reasonableness, yet always lands firmly on the consensus view.

  47. William Davies says:

    Great Vid about the 97% that Obama misquoted and everyone else has used ever since.

  48. William says:

    This so called lecturer should be locked up IMO

  49. Anthony Crown says:

    Hey Tony, Have you looked at this? I just noticed it.. I thought Spencer and Christy were legit.. See attached…

  50. William says:

    Hi Tony ( again sorry) but you need to see this watch the Vid of Rupert Green scaring Kids, and see below he is prepared to lie to make a so called case.

  51. xenomoly says:

    Bro just keep on trucking. I only wish I had more discretionary funds to make available to keep you as whole as possible. We all need people like you to constantly fight this ridiculous nonsense. I appreciate the hell out of your efforts and want desperately to keep you going.

  52. Garrett says:

    Hi Mr. Heller – I have watched your “My Gift to Climate Alarmists” video analyzing data sources. The video is powerful and I appreciate the information it provides, but I have tried to independently confirm the data sources and they often provide “dead” links or do not provide a specific data source (for example, “Data from NOAA”). I am agnostic on human-caused climate change, but most of my friends are true believers. They’ve called me out regarding your analysis because the data cannot be sourced to its government origins. Do you have more specific sources?

  53. Nelson Otto says:

    Do you have a account? I would rather support you on Bitchute than YouTube that is trying to ban you. If you have one let us know what the link is and I’ll follow you there.

  54. Mike Bucci says:

    Thanks Tony.
    Say how did your lunch go with the student who wanted in interview you?
    Best to you and yours, and good luck.

  55. detox says:

    BIOLOGISTS KNOW that viruses are NON-living molecules, though they do not admit that these molecules are produced by cells as solvents to remove toxins (which is why there are so many varieties of viruses). So “flus” are detoxifying crises, and if one dies during such a crisis, detoxification is certainly not the fault, but the toxins that could not be eliminated in time!

  56. Graham says:

    Thanks for your work Tony. Your “2020 State Of The Climate” was one my favourite videos. You cover a lot of ground and paint a very convincing picture that, at the very least, the media can’t be trusted to report accurately on climate change. Their business is to sensationalize the news because reporting real science is too boring and unsatisfying for most people.
    While a little dated now you will enjoy this editorial from July 2019,

  57. Martin says:

    Hey, Tony… if you haven’t already seen these graphs, you’re going to love them… courtesy of NOAA. Not the ones they advertise, though.

    The 400,000-year and 800,000-year ice core record graphs are most instructive, i.e. they show the cyclic nature of supposed “greenhouse” gases. We are at a peak of one of those cycles, so it is easy for the climate alarmists to cherry-pick the last hundred years and promote Doomsday.

  58. William Davies says:

    Your foes are nutters Tony , please keep bathing them with the truth, they’ll come clean in the end, I am doing my bit too.

  59. Howard T Crawford says:

    I recently made the following comment on Facebook and thought you might want to use part or all of it:

    The hypothesis being pushed by climate alarmists that Earth is warming because humans are adding CO2, a greenhouse gas, to our atmosphere is not supported by the ice core record because the hypothesis is backwards. The Earth is periodically warmed by cyclical forces and 800+/- years later some of the CO2 dissolved in the oceans effervesces and is added back into the atmosphere. Think of warming beer or soda as described in Henry’s Law. CO2 is a trace gas at only 0.04% of our atmosphere or 7,382,587,500,000 tons. Water vapor is a much more prevalent greenhouse gas at 156,468,750,000,000 tons (67 times greater).

    In the past 150 years, 1 additional CO2 molecule has been added to a 10,000 molecule sample of our atmospheric gasses. This is equivalent to adding 2 people to Madison Square Garden. Also, adding CO2 is a logarithmic function. CO2 is already at saturation for absorbing short wave radiation; adding more has a minuscule effect.

    At present we are experiencing a dearth of CO2. If CO2 falls below 150 ppm; all life on Earth ends. Ambient CO2 at 400 ppm, is greening the Earth dramatically due to 33% more of it being available in our atmosphere, but we need much more. Submarines allow it at 7-8000 ppm. You exhale it at 40,000 ppm. Greenhouse growers boost it to 1200+ ppm. Read about the Carbon Cycle. We and all animal life devour CO2 by consuming plant sugars and breathing the oxygen that comes from photosynthesis. We and all living things here are Carbon Based Life Forms; CO2 is what we are thriving on.

    The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
    H. L. Mencken, The Bard of Baltimore

  60. Chuck Diaz says:

    I’m a monthly donator now and my PayPal account is a different email address than I use posting. I think you’re doing a great job and I believe someone should start talking to someone about suing NASA for date manipulation. Just that, nothing else.
    I can’t imagine losing the argument with your data.
    Thanks for what you do.

  61. mark macfadzen says:

    Hi Tony, seen this short video on 5 year trend and its authors request for NOAA to use a more balanced reporting process.

  62. Jeffrey Bodony says:

    Thanks for your great research.A friend is trying to convert me into the AGW cult and sent mr this:
    Have you seen it?

  63. Capt. Daniel Van Blarcom says:

    I’ve worked on the Great Barrier Reef for 35 years and get pissed off by “the Reef is Dead” alarmists. The reef is far from dead, but I just work there so don’t know as much as lawyers in city offices and activists.
    I’m looking for something to counter their latest nail in the tourism coffin.
    Freshwater kills coral but cultists are absolutely opposed to dams and prefer to blame farmers
    Here is their latest ‘facts’

  64. Steve Scott says:

    Hi Tony,
    Just thought i would pass some info on to you regarding the Marambio Base temp record for the 9th Feb 2020. The record temp hasnt been updated on their wiki site in the graph of max temps because the official max temps for that day were around the 15.5 C mark but interestingly the wiki has been updated by The Guardian as to the max Antartica temp on the 9th of Feb saying 20.7C [19]. Talk about making the news up!
    Secondly this FB page
    has put up the real info how this temp came about and how the facts were twisted around to suit The Guardian and others narrative.

    Regards Steve Scott

  65. W Weeber says:

    Tony, I love and am very impressed by your work. You have growing support in many places too. See Below:

  66. david hilderman says:

    Hi Tony,
    How is it that the MASIE website shows such different sea ice than you have on presentations
    I downloaded their data from 2006 -2020 and it is exactly what you showed, but that range of time does not seem to match the graph they have on the link above

    I am getting nervous. I am going for coffee with an engineer I used to work with who now is the spokesperson for Extinction Rebellion here in Victoria BC.

  67. Bob in Castlemaine says:

    I reject the notion Tony that what you do is not working. In fact your work is vital to the ongoing prosperity and well being of all world citizens. Thank you for what you do.

  68. Robert O'Neill says:

    Your material is incredible. It is world class level research. You should reach out to Mark Steyn and help him with the frivolous hockey stick lawsuit.

  69. B. Stockwell says:

    Your contributions to Real Science!! are so valuable for all of us who grasp the implications of the anti-human, faux science juggernaut we face today. My question is, “Why does no one compliment you on your extraordinarily beautiful nature photography? The background music is perfect, too. As always, thank you for your amazing efforts to keep Truth alive.

  70. wilbes says:

    I have read most of your site and am now annoyed..I find it quite odd that governments think they can perpetrate this kind of fraud with out consequences.
    Im Canadian .. Could you look at the Canadian climate website when you have a chance and see what you can find! I would assume that because the weather is more towards the poles that the data will show something to the discerning eye right away.

    Thank you for your diligence.

  71. J. White, Ph.D says:

    Just fuck off with your stupid, ignorant, bullshit. You manage to show every time that you know absolutely nothing about climate science.

  72. Kieran O'DRISCOLL says:

    Guys need some help with this: To debunk these statements I need one good reference to each…

    I am often told there is no evidence for global warming so let’s deal with that once and for all, there are SOME of the more obvious pieces of evidence. You may quibble with one or two of them but together they make it plain GW is happening already:
    1. CO2 passed 410 ppm for the first time in millions of years
    2. The increase in CO2 matched by the drop in O2 means the additional CO2 is coming from the burning of carbon (C + O2 = CO2)
    3. The isotopic mixture (C12-C14) in atmospheric CO2 matches that from fossil fuels
    4. Oceans acidification due to absorbing some of the excess atmospheric CO2
    5. Some parts of the world greening due to extra CO2
    6. CO2 is not the only GHG that is increasing, perhaps more concerning is the rise in CH4 as the permafrost melts.
    7. June 2019 the warmest June on record despite it being a weak El Nino
    8. July 2019 the warmest month on record
    9. All 5 of the last 5 years have been in the top 5 hottest years on record, 2019 will likely make it 6 of 6.
    10. 18 of the warmest years on record have all occurred in the last 20 years
    11. Last month that had a global temperature average below the 20th Century average was over 34 years ago.
    12. Each of the average global temperature for each of the last 6 decades was higher than the previous decade
    13. High latitudes warming faster than equatorial regions
    14. The surface warming faster that the lower troposphere (alt. 4km) according to UAH (run by two climate skeptics) at a rate of about 0.15C/decade
    15. The lower troposphere warming faster the mid troposphere (alt. 7km) (ditto) at a rate
    16. The stratosphere (alt. 17 km) cooling (ditto) – a unique signature of AGW – at a rate of about
    17. The top 700 meters of the oceans have warmed by about 0.4C in the last 50 years
    18. Nights are warming faster than days
    19. Winters warming faster than summers
    20. Solar activity has been steadily declining since 1957 while global temperatures have soared.
    21. If the warming were due to solar activity then the upper levels of the atmosphere would warm disproportionately more
    22. From 1993 to 2016 the Greenland icecap (i.e., land ice) has lost 286 Billion tons of ice per year (a billion tons of ice is a cubic kilometer) – NASA GRACE Mission
    23. Over the same period The Antarctic Ice Cap has lost 127 billion tons of ice per year – GRACE
    24. The northern hemisphere is losing about 4% of its sea ice every decade (measured from 1981 – present)
    25. Over the same time Antarctic sea ice has grown by 0.8% per decade but has lost 18% of its sea ice in the last 6 years.
    26. Overall sea ice is declining at a rate of about 1.4% per decade.
    27. Glaciers all over the world are retreating and/or collapsing (getting thinner)
    28. Snow cover has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 decades
    29. Snow melt is getting earlier each year
    30. Sea levels are rising due to thermal expansion and land ice melt
    31. Bleaching damaging most corals around the world due mainly to higher water temperatures and ocean acidification
    32. Algae blooms becoming more common as water temperatures rise and greater pollution is leading to larger dead spots in the oceans and lakes
    33. Extreme weather events associated with more atmospheric energy (i.e., temperature) are on the rise
    34. Milder winters allowing some pests to thrive – killing billions of trees in the West (the dead wood provides yet more fuel for fires)
    35. More and bigger forest fires due to widespread drought in some areas
    36. Warmer air temperature allows more water content so when it does rain you get a deluge and flooding
    37. Planting zones moving poleward
    38. Animal migrations earlier and further north and higher
    39. Tropical diseases spreading to temperate areas
    40. Marginal habitats (salt marshes, mangrove swamps, arid lands) under stress
    41. Spread of deserts
    42. Permafrost melting
    43. Increasing atmospheric humidity
    44. Reduced snowfall in marginal areas like the UK
    45. Increased rate of species extinction especially fast among amphibians
    46. January 2020 – warmest January on record

  73. Martin says:

    Here’s something that is starting to go around social media… some material you might find good to comment on:

    Alarmists are using this study to say that the planet is in danger of going into a runaway greenhouse effect… despite the fact that this theory has never been proven… even disproved by some… and despite the obvious, i.e. that Mother Nature has it all in hand already with reversing of carbon sequestration, i.e. if the rain-forests are suffering, increasing carbon dioxide will help them flourish again… not to mention that life has exploded in richness and diversity in past geological times when CO2 levels have been exponentially higher than today.

    Unfortunately, common sense is thrown away by climate alarmists in favour of esoteric manipulations of data.

    • Gator says:

      A statistical model…

      I will start paying attention the day after climate models start overturning observations.

  74. Martin says:

    Kieran O’DRISCOLL, you have obviously neither read many of Tony’s pieces where concrete proof of the lie of AGW is exposed nor studied the actual data from institutions like NOAA, GISS, BOM, and others when they are not being deliberately manipulated, altered, or otherwise faked.

    Here is just a sampling of the false statements that you have made based on media propaganda…

    25. Over the same time Antarctic sea ice has grown by 0.8% per decade but has lost 18% of its sea ice in the last 6 years.


    26. Overall sea ice is declining at a rate of about 1.4% per decade.

    Possibly, as we are still at the tail end of the rise in global temperatures after the Maunder Minimum. Nothing to do with humans, though. Also, refer to the previous point. Sea ice extent is within normal parameters.

    Also see this:

    27. Glaciers all over the world are retreating and/or collapsing (getting thinner)

    Glaciers retreats and increase, retreat and increase… search “glaciers” on this site. Nothing to do with humans.

    28. Snow cover has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 decades


    29. Snow melt is getting earlier each year

    Untrue. See above.

    30. Sea levels are rising due to thermal expansion and land ice melt

    Yep. But the rate has not changed in 100s of years. Nothing to do with humans. Everything to do with the gradual rise in global temperatures since the Maunder Minimum.

    Knock yourself out with some real data:

    31. Bleaching damaging most corals around the world due mainly to higher water temperatures and ocean acidification

    Ocean temperatures data is being manipulated:

    32. Algae blooms becoming more common as water temperatures rise and greater pollution is leading to larger dead spots in the oceans and lakes

    As above.

    33. Extreme weather events associated with more atmospheric energy (i.e., temperature) are on the rise

    Complete lie.

    34. Milder winters allowing some pests to thrive – killing billions of trees in the West (the dead wood provides yet more fuel for fires)

    Uh… I thought you said that weather was becoming more extreme…?

    35. More and bigger forest fires due to widespread drought in some areas


    As for droughts, there have been longer and more severe droughts well before humans started emitting more carbon dioxide. For example, the recently predicted “drought that will never end” and “drought is now the normal state” in Australia have been shown to be just more climate alarmism. Search “drought” on this site.

    Anyway, whatevs, Kieran. We’re not going to spoon feed you. If you were REALLY interested in facts, you would do some research instead of parroting media propaganda and slogans.

  75. Martin says:

    Here’s a classic…

    “CSIRO ‘embarrassed by scientific facts on climate change’”

  76. Jonathan says:

    Tony: Please consider investigating on how the rail blockaders were trained in seminars in a Canadian university (Carlton University) last year in February. This was exposed on The pamphlet on the blog, which was written by “PowerShift Canada”, advertised these seminars and is a must see for all Canadians. The PowerShift seminars included such topics as how to organize a rail blockade, how to rappel off buildings and bridges, how to resist arrest, and “how to find the correct climate science to reference in articles” (meaning, how to cherry pick data to write articles on climate change that support your narrative). This all happened in a CANADIAN university prior to the rail blockades and was funded by organizations like Greenpeace and David Suzuki foundation. This needs to be exposed to everyone in Canada!

  77. Alan Rainey says:

    Hi Tony I am a huge fan and love your climate videos. thankfully i see them on youtube.

    I first saw you on twitter and hadn’t seen much recently to find out i’m blocked by your account? Why?

    I have never done anything but forward links to your great climate videos to all my friends not on twitter. You have a great following.

  78. Lawrence Brown says:

    The New York Holocaust link is not working. Thanks.

  79. Bryn Duffy says:

    Hi Tony!
    What is going on with atmospheric CO2 levels over the course of this lock-down and collapse in fossil fuel use? It looks like CO2 levels continue to ruse despite the drop in global manufacturing and vehicle usage based on this website:
    Does this not DESTROY the argument that man’s use of oil and fossil fuels is the driving force for CO2 level rise? Can you address this using the data?

  80. Bryn Duffy says:

    March 2020: 414.50 ppm
    March 2019: 411.97 ppm
    Last updated: April 6, 2020

    Please explain. What happens when July rolls around and we are still on lockdown and the price of oil is $20/barrel and CO2 levels are still rising?

  81. Jack Griffin says:

    Your website won’t allow me to subscribe–due to GoOgle algorythm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.