As always, climate alarmists are relying on fraud to scare the public.
Satellites show that only a tiny percentage of Australia is on fire. What the creator of the fake image appears to have done is replaced cloud cover with bright orange that looks like flames.
January 4
If that photo would be real Australia would have already lost 90% of its population as result of smoke poisoning.
Half the continent would be covered in darkness as result of the smog
+it is virtually impossible to have so many huge parts burning at the same time.
Not in desert countries as there is not enough would,
not in countries full of trees as there is too much moisture.
The purpose of this photo is the same as AOC’s 12 year nonsense.
Indoctrination.
This will be pushed for a certain period of time
and millions will be exposed to it
while the
moment of backpaddelling and clarification will be a short tiny page 8 article
99% of indoctrinated will never read.
The ITV lunchtime news in the U.K. today covered the sad funeral of the Australian volunteer but couldn’t resist referring to “the fires that are engulfing Australia”!
Interesting link from NASA:
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/90493/researchers-detect-a-global-drop-in-fires
“Researchers Detect a Global Drop in Fires”
But this is bad news, they say, as
“Fire had been instrumental for millennia in maintaining healthy savannas, keeping shrubs and trees at bay and eliminating dead vegetation.”
Thanks Martin – good information
Seems all the media today is drunk with exaggeration and and spin and hard to be believed.
There is another FRAUD; that of IGNORING the WASTE HEAT RELEASED BY COMBUSTION. My calculations show that the energy released is about equal to the claimed heat imbalance which gives rise to Global Warming.
I can provide the detail of my simple basic calculations if requested (via my Email)
This proposed analysis destroys the theory that Nuclear power would solve the world problems (no CO2 is released !) The reason this has not emerged is the UN IPCC POLITICAL declaration in 2001 that Climate Change MUST NOT BE CHALLENGED BY MEMBERS (Hence the unchallenged religion of our young generation
Much of the land supposedly on fire in that graphic is desert. You know: dry sand. That sort of desert. That’s just a big giveaway!
Whoever tried that fraud is an idjit of the first order.
It’s not a photograph it’s a compilation of data from NASA’s FIRMS (Satellite data regarding fires) from 05/12/19 – 05/01/20.
https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/#z:5;c:137.4,-27.9;t:adv-points;d:2019-12-05..2020-01-05;l:dark_gray,firms_viirs,firms_modis_a,firms_modis_t
This image is copyrighted by its author Anthony Hearsey.
Some people copied the image and posted it saying it was a NASA image whereas the originator was clear about what it represented.
So its FRAUD.
Thanks phail !!!
Alarmist propaganda, which Phail fully supports.
No the original was genuine and correctly described as being a month’s summary of the FIRMS data from NASA. Those who copied it and posted it elsewhere without the description and called it a NASA photo misrepresented it. Some of the fires were controlled burns, some were ones that were quickly put out.
condoning FRAUD.. worshiping it and defending it.
What a PHAIL !!!
How much further can you sink into your moral sewer, Phail ?
Satellites show that only a tiny percentage of Australia is on fire. What the creator of the fake image appears to have done is replaced cloud cover with bright orange that looks like flames.
No, he used data from the FIRMS satellite data (Fire Information for Resource Management System).
Putting it forward as a picture of Australian fires was FRAUD, pure ans simple
Are you so LOW that you actually are condoning this FRAUD ?
You are a Phailure in ethics, morality and as a person.
Yep. Phil is an alarmist troll. Nothing more.
Whose poor spelling is indicative of his inadequate education. In this, he and Greta have a lot in common.
Not sure what you’re talking about, I can’t recall being criticized for my spelling before. I do recall some annoying spellchecker events though. Unlike Greta I am a native english speaker though.
It was a month’s summary of the FIRMS data from NASA superimposed on a 3-D representation of the continent, Tony was wrong in supposing that the author had used clouds.
Claiming that the image is of clouds rather than actually being data from the FIRMS Satellite data is fraud, are you condoning that fraud?
What cheek, to call out Tony for fraud when he has exposed countless examples of insidious fraud, even by US Federal agencies, do you turn a blind eye to all that Phil, what about Climategate, do you believe their lies also?
After all the lies, embellishments and misrepresentations perpetrated by climate alarmists, are you not also cautiously suspicious of fraud, as Tony was in this case?
Had he not been so, we would not know the half of the adjustments and data bastardisation going on. To not likewise be circumspect in a climate of dissimulation, reduces oneself to that of a self-deluding fool.
I find it interesting that you nearly always only comment on threads a week or so after the posting date, once it has descended from the main page, and when most people have moved on. Is it because you like to have the last word for posterity Phil!
KevinPaul says:
January 15, 2020 at 8:09 pm
What cheek, to call out Tony for fraud
Interesting, I get called out for fraud on here for posting the truth showing that Tony didn’t post the truth.
are you not also cautiously suspicious of fraud, as Tony was in this case?
Well Tony could have read the news accounts about the misleading reposting of the original image which spelled out the details. (BBC for example)
Actually that’s exactly what he did (radio canada), except he deliberately omitted the text that explained the image, and added his own untrue speculations.
I find it interesting that you nearly always only comment on threads a week or so after the posting date, once it has descended from the main page, and when most people have moved on. Is it because you like to have the last word for posterity Phil!
No I usually first post within a couple of days unless I’m traveling, sometimes my posts are held up for as much as a couple of days.
Kevin, the only thing “interesting” about Pail, is his unwavering support of alarmism. You will never see Phail criticize any climate alarmist, ever. He will nitpick the smallest and most questionable details of skeptics, but will simply let the alarmist Big Lies roll.
Phail is an alarmist troll with an anti-human agenda, and is not worth spitting on.
If you expand out to see the rest of the planet, Oz looks pretty tame compared to SE Asia and sub Saharan Africa. Haven’t heard anything about them burning down!