Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- dennisambler on New Video : Protecting Children From Climate Fraud
- rah on Obama’s Plan Vs Trump’s Plan
- John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia on New Video : Demonizing Our Cleanest Energy
- Janet Marshall on New Video : Protecting Children From Climate Fraud
- Aussie on Rewriting America’s History
Archives
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
New Video : NASA Confirms Their Own “Conspiracy Theory”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thanks once again Tony, comprehensive as always.
Financial Times says dictatorship is needed for immediate climate action:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/01/06/ft-democracies-are-ill-suited-to-deal-with-climate-change/
Of course it is, because no free society would ever be stupid enough to implement the leftist suicidal cure for nothing.
When crisis arises the strong man appears.
Thanks, Mr. Heller
Comments are turned off for this video on You Tube. Intentional?
I see lots of comments on it. What are you seeing?
ditto Brian S’s comment above…so I thought to check over here at your website..
FWIW, when I first went there, it said comments are turned off for that video (and nothing below it, just blank). But now it has comments.
I see comments now turned off too!
NASA make it very clear where the data comes from on the GISS site:
“Beginning in June 2019, with the release of GISTEMP v4, we are using the adjusted monthly mean data of NOAA/NCEI’s Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) version 4 and NOAA/NCEI’s Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) v5 data. Before June 2019, in GISTEMP v3, we had been using NOAA/NCEI’s GHCN version 3 adjusted monthly mean data augmented by Antarctic data collated by the UK Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for land meterological station input.
The raw data that are the ultimate source for our analyses can be accessed via the ISTI databank (on land) and ICOADS databank (over the ocean)”
“GISS uses temperature data for long-term climate studies. For station data to be useful for such studies, it is essential that the time series of observations are consistent, and that any non-climatic temperature jumps are eliminated; those may be introduced by station moves or equipment updates or by combining reports from different sources into a single series. In the adjusted data the effect of such non-climatic influences is eliminated whenever possible. Originally, only documented cases were adjusted, however the current procedure used by NOAA/NCEI applies an automated system that uses systematic comparisons with neighboring stations to deal with documented and undocumented instances of artificial changes.”
What is the UHI adjustment Phil?
“Because some parts of some cities may be hotter than their surroundings, concerns have been raised that the effects of urban sprawl might be misinterpreted as an increase in global temperature. Such effects are removed by homogenization from the raw climate record by comparing urban stations with surrounding stations. While the “heat island” warming is an important local effect, there is no evidence that it biases trends in the homogenized historical temperature record. For example, urban and rural trends are very similar.”
Phail, we have been through this before. Homogenization does not remove anything, it only incorporates and employs. Why don’t your alarmist priests use homogenization to remove TOBS. and station moves?
Just how f@cking stupid are you Phail?
You asked what the UHI adjustment was and I told you.
I do not suffer idiots lightly.
Dumbass, homogenization is not an adjustment. What part of this do you not get?
Apparently I’m not allowed to answer that question!
Apparently you are a liar.
No apparently after rejecting my post for a couple of days after moderation Tony changed his mind.
No Phail, you are a liar. Or would you prefer to be known as stupid?
There is a very good reason why you cannot tell us what the adjustment is for UHI. And that reason is that there is no adjustment for UHI. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
But if you want us to believe that you are stupid enough to buy into the BS that homogenization removes any signal, OK.
You are now known as a dumbass.
ho·mog·e·ni·za·tion
/həˌmäjənəˈzāSH(ə) – noun – the process of making things uniform or similar
There is a very good reason why you cannot tell us what the adjustment is for UHI. And that reason is that there is no adjustment for UHI. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
Well I did tell you what the UHI adjustment was, and according to Hausfather et al:
“applying the GISTEMP step 2 UHI correction to the USHCN version 2 data has the impact of reducing the mean CONUS temperature trend from 0.73 C to 0.65 C over the period 1900–2009.”
.08 F? LOL
Zeke is an energy systems analyst and environmental economist with a strong interest in conservation and efficiency. LOL
You do realized that there is not actually an adjustment? Right? So you still cannot answer my question, but you lied and tried.
And you do realize that Zeke never studied climatology, and that he has a business that profits off the CAGW scam? Right?
And what do actual authorities say about UHI?
The term “heat island” describes built up areas that are hotter than nearby rural areas. The annual mean air temperature of a city with 1 million people or more can be 1.8–5.4°F (1–3°C) warmer than its surroundings. In the evening, the difference can be as high as 22°F (12°C). Heat islands can affect communities by increasing summertime peak energy demand, air conditioning costs, air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, heat-related illness and mortality, and water pollution.
https://www.epa.gov/heat-islands
For someone with a terminal case of picking nits, you absolutely missed every single nit in the poorly conceived “adjustments” to actual data.
Do you really want everyone here to think you are extremely stupid, or extremely dishonest?
.08 F? LOL
No 0.08ºC, I guess reptiles have trouble with reading?
Zeke is an energy systems analyst and environmental economist with a strong interest in conservation and efficiency. LOL
And co-authors from NOAA/NCEI.
You do realized that there is not actually an adjustment?
On the contrary I have given you an example of the UHI adjustment and given you the result of applying such an adjustment to the Continental US. The current version uses the more recent NOAA/NCEI version 4.
And what do actual authorities say about UHI?
You mean like NOAA and NASA who’ve actually measured UHI?
Right! Because .08C is not laughable. LOL
Zeke is a joke who could not debate even me. Odd that you have no nits to pick over an “energy systems analyst” being touted as a climate expert. But I guess it is your MO, to a T. You would never dream of criticizing alarmists, because you are a religious zealot who is willing to sacrifice millions of innocent lives for a clear leftist agenda.
And liar, you yourself admitted earlier that there is no adjustment, only ‘homogenization”.
Measuring UHI and adjusting for it are two different things Phail.
So from your post it is becoming clear that you prefer to be known as both stupid and a liar.
…so they can adjust the graph however they want then, and blame it on a ‘station move’ or ‘equipment update’. What nonsense
So when a weather station is moved uphill leading to a change in temperature of 0.7ºC what would you do?
You and yours would homogenize, if it conveniently cooled the past and warmed the present. But it doesn’t, so you adjust it.
What is the UHI adjustment Phail?
**however the current procedure used by NOAA/NCEI applies an automated system that uses systematic comparisons with neighboring stations to deal with documented and undocumented instances of artificial changes.”**
This must be the result of the AUTOMATED procedure:
Note the 0.97% correlation.
https://realclimatescience.com/61-fake-data/
Thank you Tony Heller. This video is a real jewel. To bad this couldn’t go to court to nail those crooks.
NASA and NOAA owe the world a published correction/retraction of the jacked global temperature data since the ENTIRE WORLD has been alarmed by the “accelerated” global warming. Elections have been affected and $billions have been squandered in misdirected programs. When will the restated temperature data appear in major news stories with emphasis that there has been no such acceleration? Science or politics, make up your mind NASA/NOAA.
Thanks Tony – great video!
When sharing these and similar videos, I often get push back that the graphs you show could be faked. I’m not familiar enough with the NASA website to quickly find where you get each graph. One thing that would be extremely helpful in passing on your message would be if you included the link to the NASA data either in the video, or in the description at the YouTube link.
I know you do this often when you write the articles, but people seem more willing to watch videos than read nowadays. Adding those references to your videos would help me out a lot
Thanks for considering this suggestion