No Excuse For Data Tampering

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to No Excuse For Data Tampering

  1. Disillusioned says:

    Disillusionment is a mighty good thing.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      It will test the faith of the CAGW congregation. A few weaklings may succumb to data temptation but the rest will emerge strengthened and even more devoted to the struggle with the Devil’s gas.

  2. Robert Gipson says:

    The National Climatic Data Center was “shocked” at what was going on…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME

  3. johnbuk says:

    We all look forward to the Climate Science response to these points one by one.
    Counting………………….

    • -B- says:

      There won’t be a response. They’ll call it a conspiracy theory and attack people personally. They’ll say their qualifications give them the final word. That’s what is common among academics.

      Any decent engineer tests data the way Tony did. If Zeke was correct he could do similar tests and show the biasing but in every debunking I’ve seen alarmists avoid simple data tests. They rely on authority instead which automatically makes me suspect.

  4. GeologyJim says:

    One of your all-time best videos, Tony

    A straightforward, point-by-point analysis and smack-down

    Well done!

  5. Glacierman says:

    This is simple data analysis. It has to get published. There has to be a journal that would publish this. A third party audit of the data and adjustments. If this was done to financial data it would be easily documented and the perps would be prosecuted.

    • Vegieman says:

      And your point? I assume you are including this link for humor. The comments for the video speak volumes. I just saw this clown on the Roadrunner cartoon that Tony used showing Wile E. Coyote levering a boulder off the edge of the cliff only to have it land on him. This will be the fate of all these climate thugs. There is no other explanation for these guys than they have some ulterior motive $$$.

    • Vegieman says:

      Ulterior motive from Mallen’s own comments:

      1. Tony Heller’s channel is currently growing faster than any other in this space, by far. So don’t underestimate that influence.
      2. For reasons best known to YouTube, my videos are shown to Tony Heller fans more than any other single group, so I get a large number of them coming here, and in some ways there is also an opportunity to seek to engage them on the messages they are consuming.
      3. Having done a couple of vids that responded to specific individual videos, I thought I needed to take on his most pervasive and apparently persuasive argument.

      He’s an opportunist seeking his own advancement, leaching off of Tony like a parasite. I’m guessing anyone can get waylaid by power and influence, but at this point, based on what I have seen here so far from Tony, and from others that seem to thrive on attacking him, there is still integrity at work here.

    • Gator says:

      Yeah, I had to tap out when Mallenformed claimed that Tony gives “no evidence” to back his claims. This is a provable lie, and I do not waste time on liars.

  6. Dan Paulson says:

    Zeke and a few other decent scientists have called for the creation of an entirely new system of climate network stations, using all the latest technology and knowledge. These stations would be carefully situated and would not require adjustments and tinkering to the data, as all previous “issues” would be addressed and corrected in the design and implementation of the new “reference” network.

    I find Zeke to be a pretentious *sshole, but also believe that he is at heart a good scientist. While he defends to the death all of the adjustments and other data manipulations that justify the CAGW alarmism, he also is admitting that the entire climate network of stations, and the data produced, is unfit for purpose.

  7. Michael Spencer says:

    Isn’t it wonderful that we have unbiased ‘experts’ riding on ‘gravy trains’?

  8. Mick Moore says:

    Brilliant as usual Tony. This should be compulsory viewing to all high school and college science students.

  9. Kent Clizbe says:

    Tony: “…the huge amounts of money involved…”

    You ain’t seen nothing yet!

    Bezos: “…announcement by Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest man, that he will pledge $10 billion to combat climate change…”

    https://www.barrons.com/articles/jeff-bezos-10b-climate-pledge-could-spur-giving-01582058364

    • Daniel B· says:

      YES! To fight back Tony should reach out to Tim Pool, who has a total of 1.3 million subs on YouTube (682K for main Tim Pool channel, and 574K for Timcast channel), as whilst he currently believes “in the scientists” on “climate change”, he is very level headed on most subjects (e.g. on transwomen competing in Women’s sports – NO (as I’ve said, why not give them a separate category)!), and I bet that if he was able to make contact, Tim would not only be willing to listen, he would end up being convinced of what we’ve known for YEARS, that we’re being SCAMMED on a MASSIVE level, and he would do an excellent job spreading the word far and wide.

    • Daniel B says:

      YES! To fight back Tony should reach out to Tim Pool, who has a total of 1.3 million subs on YouTube (682K for main Tim Pool channel, and 574K for Timcast channel), as whilst he currently believes “in the scientists” on “climate change”, he is very level headed on most subjects (e.g. on transwomen competing in Women’s sports – NO (as I’ve said, why not give them a separate category)!), and I bet that if he was able to make contact, Tim would not only be willing to listen, he would end up being convinced of what we’ve known for YEARS, that we’re being SCAMMED on a MASSIVE level, and he would do an excellent job spreading the word far and wide.

  10. Random Android says:

    Tony…. I engaged a “thumbs-down” viewer in YouTube combox for this video.

    His back-and-forth ended with the message below. He characterizes data adjustments very differently and assert that thr adjustments *reduce* warming….. where is he going wrong here? How can we respond to his purported “debunking” of your “hypothesis”?
    _________________________________________________

    Okay, here’s the proof that debunks Heller.
    This is the official NOAA graph, showing the difference between the RAW temperature data and the ADJUSTED (what Tony Heller calls “tampered”) data: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/noaa_world_rawadj_annual-640×465.png And, as you can see, the effect of the adjustments to the temperature data over the last century of so is to REDUCE THE RATE OF GLOBAL WARMING. (Adjustment since around 1940 do, very slightly, increase the rate of warming, but insignificantly). So, Tony Heller’s entire hypothesis falls flat on its face. Those naughty boys and girls in NOAA have been doing EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what Tony Heller is accusing them: their adjustments are making global warming look LESS BAD than the raw temperatures would suggest.

    • Gator says:

      Those are anomalies. There is no such thing as a raw anomaly. As usual, the faithful have no clue about what they speak.

    • Gator says:

      Also, the graph Tony uses is for the US, which has (or had) the best and most complete record. The global anomaly graph is art pretending to be data.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.