Lockdowns Don’t Help With Infections, And Destroy Millions Of Lives

This is exactly what I have been predicting since day one. There was never any rational thinking behind locking down the entire population.

US states see LOWER infection rates after lockdowns end, study claims | Daily Mail Online

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Lockdowns Don’t Help With Infections, And Destroy Millions Of Lives

  1. Robert Gipson says:

    Excellent. I would only perhaps slightly reword the title to “Lockdowns Successfully Destroy Millions Of Lives While Decreasing Immunity to Disease, and Packing Infected Elderly Into Nursing Homes Like Sardines, Or, Like They Pack People Into Trains In Japan, Successfully Sealed Their Doom.”

  2. Petit_Barde says:

    Same thing in Germany, where R(t) (according to the Robert Koch Institute – the public health institute in Germany) was already under 1.0 on March 23 when lockdown was applied. R(t) stopped decreasing since then (it began even to slightly increase) even if we can’t conclude anything since this variation maybe coincidental :


  3. Old Grumps says:

    Nice to see some sense from a mainstream financial institution.

  4. arn says:

    It”s AGW all over again.

    The only real threat from a corona virus is that they may unleash a far more
    leathal version of it in the next few years to be on schedule for Agenda 21.

  5. G W Smith says:

    From the very beginning we could see that even though it was very contageous most were recovering quickly. Only the elderly, those with compromised immune systems, and those with preexisting conditions were at threat of dying. It didn’t take Dr Fayuci to tell us that. So why the general lock-down? Why?! Masks did little but virtue signal. I hope this mistaken response is never repeated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.