New Video : The Tip Of The Iceberg

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to New Video : The Tip Of The Iceberg

  1. Anon says:

    Hi Tony,

    Take a look at what happened in Ukraine:


    The following are examples of the most egregious, widely observed and reported examples of election-day fraud on November 21:

    1] Illegal Use of Absentee Ballots: According to the respected NGO “Committee of Voters of Ukraine” (CVU), massive electoral fraud was committed through the illegal use of absentee voter certificates. For example, people were caught in Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy oblasts with their pockets stuffed with blank absentee ballots that they were using to vote at multiple polling stations.

    2] Opposition Observers Ejected: Observers from Our Ukraine and other opposition groups were expelled from most polling stations in eastern Ukraine on Election Day. For example, in Territorial Election Commission (TEC) district number 42 in Donetsk oblast, Our Ukraine observers were kicked out of all but a few polling stations.

    3] North Korean-Style Turnout in the East: Turnout in the pro-Yanukovych eastern oblasts was unnaturally high. In several electoral districts, turnout for the run-off round increased by 30 to 40 percent over the first round. In Luhansk oblast, the reported turnout rate hit nearly 96 percent — a number that, to quote the OSCE, even Stalinist North Korea would envy. A similar turnout rate was reported in Donetsk oblast, where 98 percent of the votes went to hometown candidate Prime Minister Yanukovych.

    4] Mobile Ballot Box Fraud: In the second round of the election, the number of voters who supposedly cast ballots at home using mobile ballot boxes was double that of the first round. Much of this voting occurred without observers being present and was massively fraudulent. In Mykolayiv oblast, for example, nearly 35 percent of the oblast’s voters purportedly cast their ballots “at home.”

    5] Computer Data Allegedly Altered To Favor Yanukovych: There were credible reports showing that that Yanukovych supporters gained illegal access to the Central Election Commission’s computer system and illegally altered vote tabulation data being transmitted by TECs to the CEC.

    6] Reports of Opposition Fraud: Yanykovych’s supporters allege that Yushchenko’s supporters stuffed ballot boxes in western Ukraine. But the reports and evidence of pro-Yanukovych fraud greatly outweighed those indicated for Yushchenko.

    Add to that: 7] Calling the race for Biden & 8] Legacy Media Blackout 9] Social Media Blackout…

    And, if this follows the script, troops on the street will be next…

  2. arn says:

    Republicans were winning big house&senate while their most famous and popular politician and the reason for their revival lost???
    While at the same time democrats lost except for their lamest,
    invisible,senile candidate and accomplicy of war criminal obama won who didnt even bother to campaign!!

    Now that’s the strangest thing in history besides since
    Jane Standley announced the collapse of the Salomon Building
    15 minutes before the collapse.

    But at least the senile guy did knew the results of the votes before it even started.

    “I dont need you to get me elected”
    Joe B.

  3. Gerald Machnee says:

    When you get caught, it becomes an “error” or “software glitch”.
    How many more are there across the country.
    Can you find a judge who understands?
    Meanwhile the MSM keeps repeating that Trump has “no basis”

  4. Dave Ellis says:

    Tony Heller is an eyes wide open guy and his videos exposing corruption in “climate science” and the U.S. election are MUST SEE.

  5. Nikki says:

    Thank you so much for posting about all this. We need the truth more than ever now.

  6. JamesMB says:

    Would it be possible for democratic operatives to obtain a list of registered voters who don’t normally vote? Then hijack the mail in ballots associated with those people. They could sprinkle those into the mail in the weeks leading up to the election then dump the rest into the post box on Election Day if it looked like their candidate was losing. It would be very difficult to detect this. Tony, perhaps your analytical software could determine if their was an increase in voter activity from typically non voters.

    • dm says:

      Yes, campaign officials can ID registered voters who rarely if ever vote. They can also ID dead voters and voters who have moved out of state. Finally, campaign aids routinely monitor–in real time or near real time–who has voted by party registration.

      The latter activity assists voter turn-out efforts. Campaigns contact people who have not yet voted to urge–sometimes to assist–them to vote.

      Numerous reports exist about the dead voting, people voting 2x (where domiciled at election time + their prior address) and other acts of vote fraud. BUT, NO EVIDENCE exists to verify these baseless, inflammatory claims intended to undermine confidence in our republic and the legitimacy of Biden’s SELECTION;-{ Alternatively, the legacy media is NOT aware of such evidence–because they fail to look for it or at it.

      The reality is: Much evidence exists. It includes:
      1) Documented incidents of people voting AFTER documented death dates.
      2) Voters wrongly registered at someone else’s address.
      3) Official vote “totals” exceeding the # of ballots filled out.
      4) Thousands of nursing home residents registering to vote ALL at the SAME time, and then voting.
      5) Outside Philadelphia, a TV news crew serendipitously filmed Dem operatives carrying from a jail, at election time, boxes filled with absentee ballots. The operatives had brought INTO the jail, in violation of the law, the absentee ballots and helped INMATES fill out the ballots (also in violation of the law). This incident occurred years ago during a photo op by a Congressman.

      All the above have gone on for generations, and determined too many elections.

      But ALL the above, are trivial compared to the corruption of computer technology used to scan & count ballots plus “tally” election totals. For more info see: FYI, Tony made me aware of this video.

  7. Arn says:

    Found some further interesting stuff: “the voting dead” at Armstrong economics
    Zerohedge s ” It defies logic” article
    and something interesting at uncle SamS nation twitter “hammer scorecard caught on cam” which needs some closer look

  8. Arn says:

    Found some further interesting stuff: “the voting dead” at Armstrong economics
    Zerohedge s ” It defies logic” article
    and something interesting at uncle SamS nation twitter “hammer scorecard caught on cam” which needs some closer look
    ( hope i didn’t spam this by coincidence )

  9. rah says:

    I realized FNC had gone to the dark side long ago. Now apparently every conservative knows it.
    BTW I’ve read that both Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett fought for Bush when Gore’s people and the media tried to steal Florida.
    That gives me hope for the SCOTUS taking up the cases and doing the right thing. This isn’t over by a long shot.

    I am thinking that there is a fair chance that in the end that the SCOTUS will declare the election results null and void since the true outcome can not possibly be determined within the time available and send the matter to congress as per the Constitution where Trump will be declared the winner. Those that think that Trump will not be declared the winner by congress in such a situation need to read article II of the Constitution.

  10. Mark Austin says:

    Look at Trump’s tweet storm this afternoon… “The threshold of identification of ballots is bigger than originally anticipated many ballots will be effected”

    • Davide says:

      About this analisys published on Zerohedge, it’s wrong.
      I think also Arn could be interested.
      Because I thought it was a real smoking gun, if correct, I did it again by myself to check it, starting from data.
      The data published in graphs are not what they are meant to be, so it’s totally “misleading”.
      After that, I found someone on twitter explaining everything, so I suggest to read him:

      It remains a little strange (this is confirmed by data) that, after hours and hours, magically appear a lot of votes (ca 170K), 85% for Biden.

  11. Davide says:

    This one also:

    Data tampering is coming out anywhere.

  12. Keep up the pressure Tony. Great work.

    The world needs you. If Biden gets in it is very bad news for Australia’s security.

  13. Dion Macdonald says:

    Hey Tony any chance you can refute the fact checking by Reuters who have comprehensively debunked many of the unsubstantiated claims you have made in your video

    • B.C. says:

      Using Reuters as a source for “debunking” anything is like using Pravda to fact-check an article critical of the old USSR.

      Nice try. You can pick up your consolation prize at the door.

      • Dion MacDonald says:

        I take it the challenge won’t be accepted then? Easy to recycle some conspiracy theories then it is to rebuke Reuter’s. Looks like I’ll be taking that prize after all.

  14. D. Boss says:

    Good work Tony. You and folks reading this may want to watch the following video:

    There is nothing “secure” about our election system. The systems are not in fact “air gapped” and there are numerous front and back doors to get in a modify the results.

    The evidence this Russel Ramsland provides is truly scary – we’ve already become a banana republic if we do not find and prosecute everyone who perpetrates or supports these fraudulent systems!

    Oh and the servers for these election systems are in Frankfurt! And almost all the voting systems are private contractors. (hard and software)

    Tony would appreciate the details this Ramsland provides in the above linked video.

    The findings of this investigation are scary enough, but more scary is no one in the gov or justice departments want to even review it!

  15. Crispin Pemberton-Pigott says:

    This is the summons issued to the election officials in Detroit.

  16. Anthony Klonaris says:

    I love your site and often post your articles on my facebook page to share with others. I’ve also donated to your fund. Now that I’m transitioning off facebook due to it’s dictatorial censorship, and onto other social media platforms like MeWe and Parler, I’d like to suggest that you add some sort of sharing buttons to your site to make it easier to do so.
    Thanks and keep up the great work

  17. Concerned Citizen says:

    How did you get the graph of the vote totals vs time for Michigan? I have seen one for Wisconsin and it had the same spike in votes for Biden in the middle of the night. Can you publish the graphs for all of the battleground states?

  18. Thanks, Tony, for all you are doing. One need by your fans is alternatives to YouTube.
    I have tried DTube, but your videos aren’t available there. I suspect you will be outed by YouTube soon, and would very much like an alternative site. Any help greatly appreciated.

  19. rah says:

    Rudy talks about some of what is happening or going to happen:

  20. rah says:

    If, in the end, no winner can be determined then we go to Article II, Section 1, clause 3.
    “The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice”

    So one state one vote based on which party controls a given state.

  21. Charles Davis says:

    Tony, you are an engineer and data person like me so you’ll understand this. What you’ve done so far is Nothing! Verify and published this and you’ll really p1$$ off the MSM.

    This shows how in key areas, Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law, the same statistical test used to detect fraud in international elections when you can’t directly observe the voting, such as in Iran.

Leave a Reply to Kevin Loughrey Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *