Twenty Years Later

Twenty years after 9/11, New Yorker Magazine calls for terrorism which would destroy the fuel supply which hundreds of millions of people depend on for their day to day survival.

The New Yorker also says the top threat to America is “right-wing terrorism”

It’s Time to Confront the Threat of Right-Wing Terrorism | The New Yorker

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Twenty Years Later

  1. Timo, Not That One says:

    This guy should be charged with inciting terrorism, along with the editors and directors of The New Yorker.

    • arn says:

      I think it was the New Yorker Seymour Hersh was working for ,
      when he exposed Obamas conspiracy with the turks to bomb Syria based on lies.
      (a grenade that killed dozens of people at a turkish market turned out to be a Nato grenade )

      And the New Yorker simply refused to print his article.
      (a similar thing happened to Glen Greenwald when he tried to write an article about Hunter Bidens laptop and sextape)
      This magazine has always been the Echochamber of war and Harbinger of terror and protector of the elites,their plans,and their puppets.

      I’m pretty sure they care so much about people,environment and climate.

  2. GWS says:

    A country is lost once it can no longer distinguish good from evil.

  3. rah says:

    And our government says that conservatives like me and many others that believe our government is now an Oligarchy are the real domestic terrorists. Some people just need a good ass whooping.

    • Gator says:

      Careful comrade! Using that kind of inflammatory language (as a conservative) will put you on a watch list. Any further outbursts, and you could be Lt Col Stuart Scheller’s roommate.

  4. GreyGeek says:

    Comrade Malm does not realize, or doesn’t care, that modern farming is nothing more than using land to convert oil into food. Destroy oil pipelines and you condem millions to starvation. On second thought, he does realize that since he advocates for killing off 90% of the population (but probably not himself because he is needed for “thinking”) and destroying pipelines is the best way to do it.

  5. The corrosive effect on the intellect of a fanatical adherence to bogus dogma appears to drive this sactimonious genre of terrorism. Quite indistinguishable from the 9/11 terrorists as far as motivation is concerned.

  6. Conrad Ziefle says:

    People tend to believe that the whole world is in the same condition that they are in now, and furthermore that it always has been and unless they change it, it will forever be. They tend to be easily distracted and made to focus on trivia. Marxist know this better than anything else they know. Compare the US to an Olympic athlete who has won more medals than anyone ever, except he has two zits on his neck. The Marxist media will rag on about the two zits, systemic blood poisoning, how the capitalists exploit him full well knowing he has this disease.
    This is the way people think today. They don’t know anything about yesterday, their grandparents and gr-grandparents. They don’t know how recently in human history we acquired all of these mechanical advantages that replace slavery, starvation, early human death, real pandemics that kill 10% or more of the population, real prejudice that kills 50,000 in one night. They are focused on the two zits and are convinced that the best thing to do is stab the athlete in the heart and built back better, as if they could build anything at all, let alone better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.