Vaccinated Adults Far More Likely To Get Infected

In the UK, vaccinated adults are far more likely to get infected than unvaccinated adults. Vaccine passports should be given to the unvaccinated, as they are much less of a threat to others.

COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – week 42

Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies are testing their vaccines on a virus which they say doesn’t exist yet.

9:20 AM · Oct 24, 2021

They also say their vaccines are 100% effective.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Vaccinated Adults Far More Likely To Get Infected

  1. Michael Peinsipp says:

    I refuse to take a 1 Experimental and unproven drug, 2 mRNA is not a vaccine.
    Vaccines are solution containing dead or nearly dead viruses contained in the solution which is injected into the human body. The body fights, makes antibodies and is safe for Life. Ever hear of ‘breakthrough’ measles!

  2. Greg Raven says:

    OK, sure. But will vaccinated adults be more or less effected by Climate Change(TM)?

    • arn says:

      Of course they will.
      Covid and Climate Change are literally the same
      (except Covid is a more usefull tool as it is not only used to transform the structure of society but also the structure of DNA).
      Covid exists to turn the WHO into a totalitarian behemoth (that’s what the WHO was created for since the beginning)
      AGW exists to turn the UN into the same monster.
      (IMF and Worldbank will come into play when the currency crisis occure).

      And vaccinated people will suffer significantly more from insignificant,not man made climate change as their compromised immune systems will become more vulnerable to the existing conditions,
      which will be blamed on climate change as the increase of mortality will be blamed on more/stronger viruses as result of AGW.

      (sorry for spoiling the storyline of the next few years)

    • Torino390 says:

      yeah, unvaccinated people develop a reaction to CO2, so they will suffer MUCH more than the morally superior vaccinated folk as the planet dies. Still, there’s only a few years left before we burn up apparently, so it’s no big deal really. ;-)

  3. Walter Wagner says:

    Stunning

  4. Walter Wagner says:

    Plausibly, those who are unvaccinated include a large percentage of people who have acquired natural immunity, are aware they are immune, and have chosen not to take the jab. Thus, the numbers are lower because of the greater percentage who already have immunity in that category.

  5. John Sturges says:

    The falsity of Fauci is enormous, blatant and symptomatic of the sociopathic personalities this administration has supported. Scientific evidence has indicated mRNA vaccines depress immunity across a wide spectrum of illnesses. Is it the nano-lipids? It is something which has caused the rise in deaths by up to 30% from immune sensitive illnesses above the expected levels. This is specially apparent in high vaccination countries.
    We know something is terribly wrong. We know Fauci and others are suppressing the truth for political ends. They throw out so much commentary much being masqueraded as truth and contradictory to confuse all into submission that it does make one dizzy.
    By that alone, it proves them liars.
    Science in the end is simple, straightforward. Even though it may be on a complex topic, the truth of it is not hard to understand by common sense all possess.

  6. Mikey0 says:

    This is the hill I am willing to die on. Literally. My body and my fucking choice!

    • mddwave says:

      I am on the same hill as a federal employee. I have had covid19 last July so I have natural immunity. Why take an experimental vaccine full of risks with no benefit

  7. nobler says:

    I have read a paper that says the jab actually reduces the manufacture of “memory” antibodies, so having the jab means the body cannot properly develop natural immunity. And the effect is not limited to just SARS-CoV-2 or its variants. Let that sink in for a bit.

    Let’s Go Brandon!

  8. Lipton C. says:

    Recently, the CDC has indirectly admitted that PCR testing kits used for diagnosing people infected with SARS COVID 2 could not differentiate between this virus and Influenza (flu) viruses:
    https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

    Critics of the notion that PCR kits could be used for such diagnosis have said from the start of this fake pandemic that the way that these kits were used provided over 90% false positive results, namely that they were used (among other dubious means) to fabricate millions of fake COVID19 “cases”, and drive the US population into a state of continuous hysteria due to a “pandemic” that never was. Whatever inflated medical phenomenon that was there, it was mostly Influenza (the flu) all this time, apparently.
    From this article:
    “CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”

    Needless to remind the reader that Dr Kary Mullis, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing the PCR test, which is broadly used in biological research, explicitly warned that his invention cannot be used to detect viral infections, namely for medical diagnosis, since it is not accurate enough to detect with certainty biological material from a virus:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOSeTz57xrCF/
    BTW, in this video, he refers to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
    Dr Mullis died in 2019.

    Typically, biologists who use PCR in their research don’t trust any result that was achieved by running more than 25-28 amplification cycles of the biological material that they’re looking for, because each amplification cycle significantly increases the likelihood of an error.
    The typical number of cycles used for PCR “diagnosis” of CIVID19 was over 35 amplification cycles, far too many to produce any meaningful result, let alone diagnosing a person as being infected, namely a COVID19 “case”.

    The CDC would not admit these facts directly, and the corporate media won’t tell you anything about them either, because doing so would be shooting themselves in the foot.

    • GreyGeek says:

      The CDC has indeed admitted that the current RT-PCR test cannot distinguish between covid and the flu:
      “CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses”
      https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

      Which is probably why the flu disappeared during the first quarter of 2020, with only 1,000 cases out of a normal 20K-60K cases. Then, once reported, the number of cases of the flu miraculously leaped to 11K.

      When one examines the testing method that has been used since Jan of 2020, we find the FDA saying:
      “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
      Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
      For Emergency Use Only

      The CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is a real-time RT-PCR test intended for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper and lower respiratory specimens”
      https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
      So, there is the FDA claim, in the instructions for how to perform the test, that the test can selectively (“qualitative”) test for CoV-2. When, in fact, it cannot.
      The instructions also use a Ct of up to 39.99 as a limit when, in fact, Mullis stated that anything over 25 generates false positives because at that level of amplification the test can find anything in anybody. The FDA giving the test a EUA was no accident. They knew how worthless the test would be at the amplification levels they were recommending. If you look at pages 34-38 you’ll see Ct values on images of the test application that range up to 25, except for one that goes to 26. The graph of the fluorescence image shows cross overs for the markers no higher than 28. The markers are N1, N2, and RNase P. When all three are + then test is considered positive. When N1 and N2 are – but RNase P is + the test is considered negative. If N1 and N1 are split, or RNase P is -, the test is inconclusive.

      When testing labs began using test kits that CAN distinguish between CoV-2 and the flu, one can expect to see the CoV-2 counts drop dramatically and the “plandemic” disappear.

  9. FedUp says:

    “Easier said than done” – Still no evidence of a formal Presidential Executive Order mandating national Covid19 vaccinations:
    https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/joe-biden/2021
    Too many potential legal and political problems with such order?

    The only Presidential EO issued so far is the one Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees:
    https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees

  10. AV says:

    Every person who has taken this vaccine is in for a momentously challenging journey. They have enormous medical risks in front of them. They’ve made a big mistake taking this vaccine, however we all need to support them on their journey ahead. The world has now changed.

  11. stephen Gowing says:

    https://rumble.com/vn7lf5-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-must-see.html
    At about 42.45 in the video a Belgian virologist explains to the powerful Chatham house group in London ,how he manipulated the Belgian people over the h1n1 virus, very insightful!

  12. Thank you Tony. This subject is crying out for your talent. Please continue to research this with all the energy you can.

  13. rah says:

    Fact: Mankind has never been able to eradicate or even effectively contain a viral contagion that is transmitted by aerosol and which has a non-human animal reservoir.

    It looks like COVID will be the same and the pin cushions are in for many more “boosters”.

    • Timo, Not That One says:

      Natural immunity will always make a virus less dangerous over time. When a virus becomes endemic, it may remain a danger to those with compromised immune systems, but not to people with a strong immune system.
      WuFlu was never a serious threat to healthy people.

      • rah says:

        That would be the natural progression but with these various mRNA “vaccines” and “break through” infections, there is reason to question if the natural progression has been altered. New strain, supposedly “vaccine resistant”. coming out of Russia.

Leave a Reply to FedUp Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.