Hunter Biden’s artwork featured in the New York Times on the last day of February 2020.
There’s a New Artist in Town. The Name Is Biden. – The New York Times
A few days later this became the dominant artwork used by the press.
Hunter Biden’s artwork featured in the New York Times on the last day of February 2020.
There’s a New Artist in Town. The Name Is Biden. – The New York Times
A few days later this became the dominant artwork used by the press.
https://banned.video/watch?id=617805b37031df173f85c2d9
“Medical Bombshell: Pfizer Vax Attacks Human Blood Creating Clots Under Microscope”
So when Hunter Biden is selling his daddies pooped diapers the New York Times talks about it and call it arts
but they didn’t said a word about his sextape and the high treason blachmails?
I bet that they didn’t bother to ask how it can be that one of the biggest talents
of arts(Chuck Connely) had to sell his paintings for 500 dollars
while a corrupt skillfree pedo crackhead can gets 1000* more for a painting.
( arts and climate science seem to follow the same arbitrary rule of a few deciders)
Well ,Connely made the mistake to make a Hollywood director angry and his artsy fartsy friends from NY who control the pricing destroyed his carreer
while Hunter seem to get the opposite treatment.
Hunter’s art reminds me of the work of Ernst Haeckel, except Hunter is an untalented bozo and Haeckel was supremely talented
Ernst Haeckel
https://mymodernmet.com/ernst-haeckel-art/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A04cDlaqdVs
Conversations