Failed Climate Predictions

Tucker Carlson discusses failed climate predictions published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions – Competitive Enterprise Institute

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Failed Climate Predictions

  1. dm says:

    Alarmist claim: Disinformation! Misinformation! Malinformation! Twitter, Facebook, NYT, WaPo … ignore or distort “Wrong Again …”. Tony Heller & the CEI cherry-picked and took articles out of context !!!

    REALIST reply: All articles are shown in their entirety. The collection shows the breadth of alarmists’ claims. Reality refutes all. Alarmism can NOT be science because its theorems, models … yield results that differ from observation.

  2. dm says:

    Tony, great to see your work recognized!!

    Pls tell CEI to pair the articles forecasting the drowning of islands with a recent photo of Manhattan + scientific studies showing 80+% of the doomed islands ADDED land mass rather than drowned.

    Pls also suggest CEI emphasize the absurdity of forecasting a Siberian climate for the UK while forecasting global warming sufficient to melt the Arctic ice cap.

  3. arn says:

    Nice – and maybe there is a follow up article that
    sums up all the known catastrophies of the pre 300 ppm perfect climate era
    with millions of victims because co2 failed to do its job as climate controllind unit.
    And how those scenarios from the past would be abused nowadays as 100% proof of global warming.

  4. Russell Cook says:

    As I pointed out in a tip to AmericanThinker that they turned into a short blog post, I wanted to find links to Tucker’s opening monologue the following morning to share with friends. What I initially ran into was one of the weirdest “nothing to see here, move along” things I’ve ever seen from Google, placed prominently on top of the search results:

    “Google grapples with Tucker Carlson’s debunking of ‘climate crisis’ predictions of doom”

  5. GWS says:

    All these years and still no one has come up with a rock solid explanation of how CO2 does NOT drive climate and why any of it that man produces will NOT tip the scales and bring on the end of the world. — Why not?

    Are those scientists all getting slimed, bought-off, or “disappeared” because of the hundreds of billions of dollars at stake?

    Or is the science of AGW and “greenhouse gasses” still not settled?

    • CO2 is Plant Food. When CO2 goes UP, Plants grow more Vigorously. When CO2 goes DOWN, plants do Poorly.
      AND more Green Plants means more FOOD!!!

    • Bob G says:

      does one part per 10,000 drive the climate or the 10,000? I’m voting for the 10,000… and there’s your answer

    • dm says:

      Science shows climate change drives atmospheric CO2 concentration changes. Warming oceans release CO2 into the atmosphere. Cooling oceans absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. In both cases, ocean temperature changes BEFORE atmospheric CO2 concentration changes. The science is simple and PROVEN. CO2’s solubility in water is inversely related to temperature.

  6. conrad ziefle says:

    How much would the oceans rise from sea ice melt if all of it melted globally? Ask Archimedes, he knew.

  7. Pete says:

    And did you notice that Watts has suddenly just discovered actual temps vs anomalies? hmmm

  8. Kent Clizbe says:

    Excellent overview by Carlson.
    Too bad he didn’t cite you as the source, Tony.
    Even so, you’ll go down in history as the climate scam’s historian–sort of like Rome’s Thucydidides.
    Thanks for your continued vigorous efforts fighting the scam.

  9. Peter Carroll says:

    I have but one criticism of Tucker Carlson’s presentation. He has fallen for the unproven statement, (used far too often by us “deniers”) that, “the climate is changing now, it never stops changing”, or variations to that statement.
    That continual change, (if it exists), must be imperceptibly slow, virtually undetectable.
    Under the Koppen-Geiger Climate Classification System, I have not been able to find one single change of a climate zone, or sub-zone, anywhere on the planet.
    There have been many annual, multi-annual, even decadal variations, but none have been of long enough duration to be classed as a change.

    I am also intrigued that none of our climate change “experts”, ever refer to differences between the Minoan Warm period, Middle Bronze Age Cold Period, and The Iron Age Cold Epoch, the Roman Warm period, the Dark Ages Cooling, Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age, as “climate change”, but our current (mildly) warm period is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *