Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Ohio Cyclist on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- Gordon Vigurs on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
It takes a lot of chutzpah for climate activists like Paul Pukite (@WHUT) to try to tie scientists skeptical of climate alarmism to Putin, since Putin has a long history of bankrolling climate activists in the West, as a means of reducing competition to Russian energy.
That’s not some sort of right-wing conspiracy. Even The Grauniad noticed:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/19/russia-secretly-working-with-environmentalists-to-oppose-fracking