Three decades of what participants call a “climate agreement” have had no impact on the growth rate of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
- Blinken Not Happy Yet
- Chief Executive Kamala
- “Investigated And Discredited”
- Ice-Free Arctic Warning
Recent Comments
- arn on Woke Grok
- Francis Barnett on Woke Grok
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Ivan G Wainwright on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- conrad ziefle on Grok Explains Gender
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Disillusioned on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Gordon Vigurs on Grok Explains Gender
- Gordon Vigurs on Woke Grok
I saw, on TV today, a graph of ‘carbon’ emissions increase since the COP meetings started. It showed a sharp dip during 2020 and 2021. I wonder where the graph originated. As the human fossil fuels usage contribution is so small as to be invisible, this is clearly not accurate.
The diagram shows a strong positive correlation between the COPs number and the CO2 concentration.
May be they should test the hypothesis that COPs and climate activism are the culprit, by for example, stop all this hand-waving for, say, 5 decades.