NASA chooses to ignore 540 million years of earth history, and instead promote superstitions about fossil fuels.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Disillusioned on “Fascist Salute”
- Francis Barnett on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Bob G on “Fascist Salute”
- arn on “Fascist Salute”
- Terry Shipman on “Fascist Salute”
Like all bureaucracies, NASA is governed by Parkinson’s law. As it expands, the number of bureaucrats increases, and the number of scientists decreases. Most of the workload is the administration of administrators, which is hampered by the presence of scientists. It is a pity so few people are familiar with the works of C Northcott Parkinson nowadays.
There is a similar problem in defence procurement. In the past an innovation might be assessed for its potential in the battlefield. Nowadays all requirements must flow down from the decrees of generals, resulting in equipment which is obsolete by the time it enters service. The military are surprised at the effectiveness of drones in the current Ukraine, a possibility well known to the lowliest assistant scientific officer back in 1985. But what do scientists know?