A look at how government agencies rewrite history to keep their sea level scam alive.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Disillusioned on “Fascist Salute”
- Francis Barnett on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Yonason on “Fascist Salute”
- Bob G on “Fascist Salute”
- arn on “Fascist Salute”
- Terry Shipman on “Fascist Salute”
Fantastic forensics.
Keep up the good job-thanks.
Why are they so obviously wrong:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=8518750
They have to take control of the past better:-)
Winston Smith still sleeping on the job.
Could somebody please explain to me how a radar operating at 10cm wavelength can measure range to a few milimetres. The only method I can think of would be a homodyne system comparing the phase of the return signal with the transmitted signal, over a chirp covering a bandwidth equal to the carrier That would be noisy as hell, practically impossible to construct, and would have an unambiguous range resolution of 5cm, That range resolution is determined by swept bandwidth is radar 101. Greater ‘accuracy’ (NOT resolution) introduces ambiguity, e,g. an inability to distinguish returns from clouds from that from the surface.
And then there is the uncertainty regarding the exact elevation of the measuring satellite at any time in its orbit. I don’t know the answer but it seems likely to be at least a few feet.
In addition, The Battery sea level gauge is mounted on bedrock (most are not) and has been operating since before Abraham Lincoln was President. It shows a steady rise since then. It also has a GPS elevation gauge operating since about 2011 which shows that at least since 2011, the tide gauge has been sinking at about 1/2 of the rate of observed sea level rise. Because geologic processes are extremely slow in human terms and the tide gauge has shown no notable changes for 160 years it is likely that the sinking has been going on steadily for centuries.