A look at how government agencies rewrite history to keep their sea level scam alive.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Fantastic forensics.
Keep up the good job-thanks.
Why are they so obviously wrong:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=8518750
They have to take control of the past better:-)
Winston Smith still sleeping on the job.
Could somebody please explain to me how a radar operating at 10cm wavelength can measure range to a few milimetres. The only method I can think of would be a homodyne system comparing the phase of the return signal with the transmitted signal, over a chirp covering a bandwidth equal to the carrier That would be noisy as hell, practically impossible to construct, and would have an unambiguous range resolution of 5cm, That range resolution is determined by swept bandwidth is radar 101. Greater ‘accuracy’ (NOT resolution) introduces ambiguity, e,g. an inability to distinguish returns from clouds from that from the surface.
And then there is the uncertainty regarding the exact elevation of the measuring satellite at any time in its orbit. I don’t know the answer but it seems likely to be at least a few feet.
In addition, The Battery sea level gauge is mounted on bedrock (most are not) and has been operating since before Abraham Lincoln was President. It shows a steady rise since then. It also has a GPS elevation gauge operating since about 2011 which shows that at least since 2011, the tide gauge has been sinking at about 1/2 of the rate of observed sea level rise. Because geologic processes are extremely slow in human terms and the tide gauge has shown no notable changes for 160 years it is likely that the sinking has been going on steadily for centuries.