A look at how government agencies rewrite history to keep their sea level scam alive.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- conrad ziefle on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Robertvd on 65 Years Of Progress!
Fantastic forensics.
Keep up the good job-thanks.
Why are they so obviously wrong:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=8518750
They have to take control of the past better:-)
Winston Smith still sleeping on the job.
Could somebody please explain to me how a radar operating at 10cm wavelength can measure range to a few milimetres. The only method I can think of would be a homodyne system comparing the phase of the return signal with the transmitted signal, over a chirp covering a bandwidth equal to the carrier That would be noisy as hell, practically impossible to construct, and would have an unambiguous range resolution of 5cm, That range resolution is determined by swept bandwidth is radar 101. Greater ‘accuracy’ (NOT resolution) introduces ambiguity, e,g. an inability to distinguish returns from clouds from that from the surface.
And then there is the uncertainty regarding the exact elevation of the measuring satellite at any time in its orbit. I don’t know the answer but it seems likely to be at least a few feet.
In addition, The Battery sea level gauge is mounted on bedrock (most are not) and has been operating since before Abraham Lincoln was President. It shows a steady rise since then. It also has a GPS elevation gauge operating since about 2011 which shows that at least since 2011, the tide gauge has been sinking at about 1/2 of the rate of observed sea level rise. Because geologic processes are extremely slow in human terms and the tide gauge has shown no notable changes for 160 years it is likely that the sinking has been going on steadily for centuries.