A look at how government agencies rewrite history to keep their sea level scam alive.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- Fact-Free Economist
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on Artificial Stupidity
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Desperation
- Kenan on Climate Desperation
- Yammobethere on Artificial Stupidity
- arn on Climate Desperation
- feathers on The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- roaddog on Artificial Stupidity
- Bill Odom on Climate Obsession
- Francis Barnett on Artificial Stupidity
- arn on Artificial Stupidity
Fantastic forensics.
Keep up the good job-thanks.
Why are they so obviously wrong:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=8518750
They have to take control of the past better:-)
Winston Smith still sleeping on the job.
Could somebody please explain to me how a radar operating at 10cm wavelength can measure range to a few milimetres. The only method I can think of would be a homodyne system comparing the phase of the return signal with the transmitted signal, over a chirp covering a bandwidth equal to the carrier That would be noisy as hell, practically impossible to construct, and would have an unambiguous range resolution of 5cm, That range resolution is determined by swept bandwidth is radar 101. Greater ‘accuracy’ (NOT resolution) introduces ambiguity, e,g. an inability to distinguish returns from clouds from that from the surface.
And then there is the uncertainty regarding the exact elevation of the measuring satellite at any time in its orbit. I don’t know the answer but it seems likely to be at least a few feet.
In addition, The Battery sea level gauge is mounted on bedrock (most are not) and has been operating since before Abraham Lincoln was President. It shows a steady rise since then. It also has a GPS elevation gauge operating since about 2011 which shows that at least since 2011, the tide gauge has been sinking at about 1/2 of the rate of observed sea level rise. Because geologic processes are extremely slow in human terms and the tide gauge has shown no notable changes for 160 years it is likely that the sinking has been going on steadily for centuries.