The Climate Data Corruption Business

“If You Torture the Data Long enough It Will Confess to Anything”

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Climate Data Corruption Business

  1. Disillusioned says:

    Wow. This video, and the corresponding post with links, are indictments. The video should be played before Congress, and a grand jury. It should be played on Tucker’s show and many others. All readers should post it on their social media accounts. Send it to your liberal Uncle Bob and Aunt Betty. Share it with your kids and grand kids. Toto was good enough to compile it; Spread it!

  2. Big Brother says there is warming, therefore there is warming. Tony is guilty of thought crime. Truth is what the ‘experts’ say. It has nothing to do with facts or science, or even reality.

  3. arn says:

    And if you torture people long enough with the results of corrupted data
    they will surrender to anything.

  4. Laurie says:

    I hate to say it, but ‘push is coming to shove’, and the only thing that will spare anyone is prayer.

  5. Bob G says:

    I live in South Central Minnesota and we’re having a very warm winter so far with the exception of 10 days in January. last winter we had record snow fall this winter almost nothing. there’s a saying in Minnesota about winter temperatures and it goes back decades and it goes like this… when it’s warm in Alaska it’s cold in Minnesota and when it’s warm in Minnesota it’s cold in Alaska. often that cold weather in Alaska will end up in Minnesota in a week or two.

  6. conrad ziefle says:

    I have a real hard time with this “time of observation” bias thing, particularly if they don’t have a log that shows that indeed the temperature readings were taken at peak times. As Tony said, as a kid he quickly realized this was a problem and compensated for it. Why would you think that scientists of the time would not have known it? If they say that they just don’t trust the old observations, because there isn’t a time of observation note, then I see their position as entirely bogus and egotistical. What makes them think that they are smarter than their predecessors? More likely it is the other way around because their predecessors had to understand difficult math methods which computers now do. Newton, who said, “I have seen far, because I have stool on the shoulders of giants,” must be rolling in his grave at their arrogance. It seems particularly evil when you see that the old readings lineup statistically with the current, unadjusted readings. Why would you “torture” data to declare a systemic change when the raw data shows system consistency?
    It is somewhat like a nuclear power plant operator putting a blow torch to some of the thermocouples and then declaring, “Something is malfunctioning in the reactor!”
    It is extremely criminal. More so than praying at an abortion clinic. It has caused a crippling mass formation psychosis worldwide, and the damage is massive.

  7. Bill says:

    Ivar Giaever (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1973) and John Clauser (Nobel Prize in Physics, 2022) both deny the climate narrative. The interesting thing to me is that they are both experimental physicists by training and temperament.

    Data tampering is the biggest sin to both of them, I’m sure.

  8. Scott Allen says:

    I don’t get how CO2 warms the planet…

    1880 CO2 was 290 ppm and NOAA temperature graph reads 0.0 (their starting point)
    1910 CO2 was 300 ppm NOAA graph reads -0.4 degrees a DROP of 0.4
    1940 CO2 was 310 ppm NOAA graph reads +0.13degrees an INCREASE of 0.6
    1970 CO2 was 326 ppm NOAA graph reads +0.03 degrees a DECREASE OF 0.17

    So we added almost 40 ppm and NOAA only shows a 0.03 increase in temperature
    On top of that it wasn’t until 1978 that we were able to reach the temperatures of 1940 and CO2 was at 338 ppm almost 50 ppm higher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *