Startling New Revelation

A startling new revelation that much of the USHCN temperature data is fake.  I’ve been reporting on this for ten years, and the number is closer to 50% than it is to 30%.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Startling New Revelation

  1. dm says:

    Tony, a TRUE prophet is almost always reviled during his or her lifetime;-( Fortunately, and deservedly so, you have the satisfaction of living long enough to see the deceivers exposed.

    How much of the hockey stick “data” is also a manntasy, or hansentasy …?

  2. Conrad Ziefle says:

    Fabricated data is an oxymoron.

  3. Larry K says:

    Oh my goodness!

  4. Rats abandoning the sinking ship? Like the Titanic’ s pumps, the lies could only keep it afloat for a very limited period. Truth is flooding in, and they cannot stop it.

    • Disillusioned says:

      I am glad for the Zero Hedge article. But, no – I do not believe the rats are abandoning The Good Ship Lollipop and all of the tasty sustenance it provides.

      A search engine query of, “temperature data from non-existent stations NOAA” reveals reality – links to the Zero Hedge article, to Heartland.org, climatechangedispatch.com, theburningplatform.com, LewRockwell.com and co2coalition.org (skeptical/libertarian/conservative-leaning sites).

      The rest of the links are to NOAA pages and Cabal apologist/fact-checker articles. Legacy, Cabal media links are nowhere to be found.

  5. arn says:

    So we have 1 /3 of stations compromised by increasing urban heat island effects
    and 1 /3 of stations that do not even exist .
    (And I would not be surprised that even the non – existent data from non – existent stations is being adjusted upwards if necessary. )

    How can we even determine any global climate trend when even the country with the best temperature record operates with 2/3s of trashy data while most of the planet has barely any relevant data for more than half of the past 150 years?

    That’s worse than Voodoo and as bad as treeriing reading
    and It’d be interesting to know how many of those official stations world wide really exist.

    • Perhaps reading goat entrails, or tea leaves, Tarot cards or astrology, would be more reliable. In ancient Rome, it was only necessary for the sacred chickens to eat the sacred corn to convince superstitious legionaires that they would be victorious in battle. What is the difference? Climate alarmism is equally reliant on superstition to gain acceptance by a technically ignorant public.

    • dm says:

      Voodoo? Naw. Climate alarmists rely on digital Ouigi Boards “fine tuned” to match history;-}

      Devastating summation: “…1 /3 of stations compromised by increasing urban heat island effects and 1 /3 of stations that do not even exist …How can we … determine a global climate trend …?”

    • Robertvd says:

      And of those no longer reporting how many were rural stations having the ‘wrong’ temperature record ?

  6. jb says:

    analogy: many major US cities (NY, Chicago, Miami, Houston, St Lou, LA, SF) do not report crime stats anymore (since 2022 or thereabouts).
    Miraculously, crime has gone down in the US.

  7. Richard E Fritz says:

    MY question do Michael Mann & Al GORE really believe or is just the $$$ they steal is what they believe in- Greta is just a stupid believe OR?

    • arn says:

      They both know it is crap.

      Al Gore knows that it is a lie because he is a politician and lying is his job(as EU leader Juncker said “When thinks get serious we always lie “)
      + all of his prediction from his documentary turned out wrong
      + Al Gore was already full grown up during the cooling scare.

      Mann knows it because his treering data was literally debunked on day 1 by Briffas treering analysis.

      • Disillusioned says:

        Agree. Of course those two know. Mann participated in it, and Gore profited off of it. They also know Goebbels’ recipe – make the lie big and keep repeating it. And never back down, no matter what.

  8. czechlist says:

    Of the stations actually reporting, how many are properly sited?

    • Conrad Ziefle says:

      They mess with it in so many ways that it is overwhelming and exceedingly difficult to accept what they say in any form. I think that the best climate change grants that the government can give over the next several years would be to go through the status of the planet monitoring and reporting system at every level and reconstruct it to sample and report accurately. I think the honest thing to have done decades ago was to establish new stations in pristine areas near old stations then convert to the new one. They should do that now. We will suddenly show global cooling.

    • Robertvd says:

      And how many are rural stations ?

  9. Crispin Pemberton-Pigott says:

    NOAA is the National Enquirer of temperature data.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *