If people worried about global warming spent more time outdoors, perhaps they would have a more realistic view of the world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
Someone suggested that if any of these lamebrained governments actually sued the oil companies, then the oil companies (energy companies, because they invest in all forms of energy production) should immediately stop selling oil products within the jurisdiction of that governmental entity. Maybe post some ads in the papers explaining why they stopped.
YouTube still persists with that Wikipedia definition of global warming. The IPPC definition is of the difference between outgoing and incoming radiation. Whilst this might be possible transiently, if integrated up over time, such a discrepancy would credit greenhouse gases with the magical property of generating energy from nothing. I find it strange how ‘;irrefutable settled science’ contravenes what is probably the most fundamental principle of physics.
the entire fundamental physics and science is out the window- the IPCC- Bernie AOC Horse face Kerry & entire DNC and EU want POWER and Control
The difference between incoming energy and outgoing energy is the energy gain or loss of the system. When you look at Earth, the energy gain or loss would be hard to figure out. How much energy does Earth have, to its core? How much heat gain, if you can decide what that is, is from the sun, and how much is not really gain, but just a transfer from the core outward? Can you really measure the outflow of energy from the system when you can’t model clouds accurately, and that is just one mechanism that is poorly modeled? In the end, these climate shamans just look like a whack-a-mole (not is a chemical way) Dr. Seuss character.
Since “climate change” is attributed to world-wide CO2 emissions, then Vermont is attempting to hold the entire world responsible for Vermont. What a bunch of maroons.