The combination of fake scientists and fake journalists joining forces to create fake climate stories, is a fascinating phenomena. I feel privileged to get to watch this theater of the absurd play out.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Milton Propaganda
- “Yes … definitely”
- “Antarctica has turned green”
- Rapidly Intensifying Hurricanes
- Kamala Can Prevent Hurricanes
- The Ultimate Global Warming Test
- “ready for the next one”
- Combining Science And Religion
- 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
Recent Comments
- czechlist on “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- arn on Milton Propaganda
- conrad ziefle on Milton Propaganda
- conrad ziefle on Milton Propaganda
- arn on Milton Propaganda
- D. Boss on Milton Propaganda
- Gordon Vigurs on Milton Propaganda
- Bob G on Milton Propaganda
- Bob G on Milton Propaganda
- Ulric Lyons on “Yes … definitely”
Well for them, CO2 increase equals heat increase, so the tree rings indicate heat increase indirectly, but here we have a conflict. Heat is supposed to kill all life on Earth, but yet they are saying heat increases tree growth. Also, how is it that heat is destroying the economy, yet the same people are saying it is increasing plant life, and therefore animal life, i.e. making farms and forests more productive? Conflicts such as these are easily dismissed in a religion, but cannot be ignored by science.
Everyone should have a garden. You can learn a lot about plant growth that way. Water, soil, sunlight, temperature, and CO2, all impact how “thick” the tree rings are. Heat is good, to a point, but it can also inhibit growth and damage, particularly with a lack of water. If you think about it, a degree of temperature is , in F, 1/460th increase, very small, less than .25%. A rainy year might deliver 400 to 500% more water than a normal year. Certainly that is a bigger factor. In modern times, one would expect that the scientists would be able to track temperature accurately with thermometers and not to need to fall back on tree rings. And when they do fall back onto tree rings, you would expect them to have to factor out droughts, plant plagues, and other factors. If they can do that and can still see a constant incremental increase over the last 100 years or so, you would attribute that to increased CO2, not temperature. The relationship between increased CO2 and plant growth is well established through scientific experiments, and is within the range tested, I believe, linear. The relationship between temperature and plant growth is not linear, but rather has some optimum.
science crap- its about POWER- the Left- Democrats like Bernie Warren and AOC want it to get hands on TRILLIONS to spend to buy votes – the UN wants money & Power- Bill Gates is the only one really interested in doing something like- KILLING Half the humans and selling them his 20% ownership in fake FOOD