The combination of fake scientists and fake journalists joining forces to create fake climate stories, is a fascinating phenomena. I feel privileged to get to watch this theater of the absurd play out.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Quadrupled Border Crossings
- “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Hottest Day Ever
- Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Same Weather As Always
- “Climate Change Is Killing People”
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Miami Drowning
- Blocked By Ice
- Will He Be Disappointed?
- Don’t Be A Conspiracy Theorist
- Washington Post Spy Analyst
- Summer Heat And Burn Area
- Climate Heresy
- “I do not want to hear about the 1930s”
- “33 storms”
- Something New In North Dakota
- Survival Of The Planet
- “baseless far-right conspiracy theory”
- The BBC
- Biden Uniting America
- Firearms Safety Rules For Actors
- Science Banned In France
- Global Warming in Nevada
- Saving The Climate With Soy
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- arn on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Gamecock on Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Luigi on Hottest Day Ever
- Disillusioned on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on Hottest Day Ever
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- arn on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
Well for them, CO2 increase equals heat increase, so the tree rings indicate heat increase indirectly, but here we have a conflict. Heat is supposed to kill all life on Earth, but yet they are saying heat increases tree growth. Also, how is it that heat is destroying the economy, yet the same people are saying it is increasing plant life, and therefore animal life, i.e. making farms and forests more productive? Conflicts such as these are easily dismissed in a religion, but cannot be ignored by science.
Everyone should have a garden. You can learn a lot about plant growth that way. Water, soil, sunlight, temperature, and CO2, all impact how “thick” the tree rings are. Heat is good, to a point, but it can also inhibit growth and damage, particularly with a lack of water. If you think about it, a degree of temperature is , in F, 1/460th increase, very small, less than .25%. A rainy year might deliver 400 to 500% more water than a normal year. Certainly that is a bigger factor. In modern times, one would expect that the scientists would be able to track temperature accurately with thermometers and not to need to fall back on tree rings. And when they do fall back onto tree rings, you would expect them to have to factor out droughts, plant plagues, and other factors. If they can do that and can still see a constant incremental increase over the last 100 years or so, you would attribute that to increased CO2, not temperature. The relationship between increased CO2 and plant growth is well established through scientific experiments, and is within the range tested, I believe, linear. The relationship between temperature and plant growth is not linear, but rather has some optimum.
science crap- its about POWER- the Left- Democrats like Bernie Warren and AOC want it to get hands on TRILLIONS to spend to buy votes – the UN wants money & Power- Bill Gates is the only one really interested in doing something like- KILLING Half the humans and selling them his 20% ownership in fake FOOD