Fifteen years ago, ABC News said cats and hamsters cause hurricanes, floods and droughts, and promoted eating your dog to save the planet.
Authors Claim Pets Are More Damaging to Environment Than SUVs – ABC News
Fifteen years ago, ABC News said cats and hamsters cause hurricanes, floods and droughts, and promoted eating your dog to save the planet.
Authors Claim Pets Are More Damaging to Environment Than SUVs – ABC News
I had no idea dogs and cats were so destructive of our environment. Imagine the drag on resources by all the wild animals. Will we next see them advocate for killing the entire animal kingdom to save nature? And why stop there when plants also use water and mineral resources of the earth!
Actually,for some strange reason, it is only the things you need and/or like that are destroying the environment and climate.
Those are the straight white males outside of the human realm and is under attack .
The rest has protected minority status.
If you want real scientists, you need to start in grade school. Basic things like memorizing math tables (good for your memory development), learning cursive (good for pattern recognition), reading complex stories and discussing them in class (good for comprehension, reading and otherwise), basic logic (of course!). Above all, teaching honesty (a boy has this and a girl has that, and they are not interchangeable). Then maybe you can get some good studies from them as scientists later on in their lives.
Just one more item of proof: you just can’t make this shit up.
2009 – the year my old paradigm started to crack, and would eventually fall apart into thousands of irreparable pieces.
Hello from New Zealand! It’s COLD. So cold it’s SNOWING on our Southern Alps! Again, like last week, and a few weeks before that: OK, it’s snowed every single month this year so far, 11 out of 12, almost a full house.
Our summer solstice is only 4 weeks away, yet temperatures are what they are in mid-winter (June/July for us), ie. COLD! Please, can we have some of that mythical imaginary long-spoken-of ‘warming’ – it’s failed to turn up even after 36 years.
BTW never heard of these ‘Vales’, though their name rhymes with ‘fails’.
It is second order tosh. The fundamental premise of carbon dioxide representing an existential threat is arrant nonsense. There may be good evidence that pets produce CO2 but that does not validate the absurdity of AGW. Yes, all animals and rotting vegetation emit CO2, but it doesn’t matter a tinker’s cuss.
It is the old conjurer’s trick of diversion. Present semi-attached studies which might be credible to draw attention away from the fact that the fundamental global warming theory is utter tosh.