“Nearly half of Dems say fines, prison time appropriate for questioning vaccines, poll says”
Nearly half of Dems say fines, prison time appropriate for questioning vaccines, poll says
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Steven Fraser on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on UK Net Zero
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Robertvd on UK Net Zero
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- gordon vigurs on UK Net Zero
- Independent on UK Net Zero
To claim to ‘believe in’ science implies you do not know what science is. It is a method of enquiry, not religious dogma. The alarmist ‘arguments’ follow the lawyer’s Aristotelian rhetoric, which predates the scientific method by about two thousand years, but is handy for convicting witches in the complete absence of credible evidence. All you have to do is persuade a group of people who were too stupid to think of an excuse to get out of jury duty, which is much easier than meeting the rigorous standards required by science. Persecution of the ‘unvaxxed’ is motivated by the same fear and superstition that persecuted ‘witches’. Any attempt to uncover the actual facts leads to immediate accusation of witchcraft.
“Either you are with us or you are (with) the terrorists/against us”
GW Bush (it always works when you are the good and the others the devil)
His “coalition of the willing” is also currently being recycled
by Keir Starmer(probably as revenge for Biden stealing Kinnocks speech – from that moment on the Bidens became coal miners)
With Starmer deriding the only people who would fight for the country as ‘right wing exremists’ (and ditto for the other European powers, except perhaps Hungary), a ‘coalition of the willing’ will not be able to field much of an army. Who would fight for regimes that don’t even try to hide their contempt for their people?
Well, the English will sent their child rapers.
The Germans their fagots.
The french will sent white flags.
Easy win for Europeans.
Especially when we consider how weak,disorganized,unmotivated the Russian shovel fighters are,
a bunch of toddlers with waterpistols should be enough to defeat them.
That’s why I do not understand why they suddenly all the trillions to defeat decimated Russian pussies.
I’m pretty sure they haven’t been lying to us all the years,
and that the Russian could take any territory at any time, as it happened with Kursk the very second the western side wanted to use it as leverage,is just a myth.
Or maybe Dick Durbin already revealed the real plans ;
to let illegals fight the wars and give them citizenship in return(the bill is called “Courage to serve” act iirc).
Europeans will do the same.
How convenient that the invaders are 80% military age.
Arn: it depends on how many casualteis one is ready to allow.
Apparently putin is ready to allow many and does not care until he finds some poor people that go to die for mother russia.
That said, Europe does not have even water pistols to play in the garden.
The diet which defence was subject to after the end of the cold war has left only skeletons.
It’s well known that in 2014 Germany had only 14 ready to use Eurofighters, the rest not flyable due to lack of maintenance.
Army’s helicopter pilots were accumulating flight hours in rescue helicopters in order to save the maintenance costs of military helicopters.
And last, German Bundeswehr could not find 20 operational leopards to be sent to Norway for a NATO exercise.
From these days little has been done to recover. Even in 2014 when all began in Ukaine, Europeh as not changed its defence politics.
According to BBC & Mediazona the number of killed Russian soldiers was
90K by jan. 2025.
And that’s an upward corrected figure with a new Algorithm where they started to throw around with numbers backed by – nothing but a new algorithm
They had this number at 60K ,but then something happened last year,maybe a USAID paycheck, a climate model or so.
Of course we have NPR with 500K or NYT with 700K dead Russians if you like them more,
but the problem remains the leaked US documents that Ukraine loses 8 soldiers for every Russian and 4mio – 5.6 mio dead Ukrainians does not make sense.
And since the documents were released Ukraines air defense and military was massively degraded while Russians ramped up FAB and Drone production and added drones with fiberoptics.
The gap has grown – and that’s why Russians are winning on all fronts today.
Ukraines top military is 80% gone and replaced by conscripts, the Russian military still exists.
The most realistic number would be around 70.000 K with a 1:10 ratio.
The official deathtoll of Ukrainians is 35.000 according to Zelensky.
This would put Russian number at 4.400 at an 8:1 ratio – and 4400 is nonsense.
Now you can believe the western official numbers and those are all over the place.
But why don’t you believe them in terms of climate?
Even the climate narratives and numbers are way more coherent than those about Ukraine.
Keep in mind that Ukraine had no relevant gains during their huge sommer offensive on a 1300 km front,
except for the place where they blew up the dam and reshaped the battlefield.
But they succeeded inside Russia? !
Strange isn’t it?
Not when the Russian were not really bothered to keep them out or kick them out and kept the door open knowing very well that Kursk is the best way to kill Ukraines remaining best troops in huge numbers.
Do you really think that the place Ukraine was allowed to enter was the place Russians can sent people through a pipeline to attack them from behind?(history legends has a great video about that on YT)
It is Ukraine that had a dozen mobilization.
(you don’t need any if you only lose 11000 per year).
It is Ukraine that is kidnapping people on streets to force them to fight.
It is Ukraine saying that they run of manpower.
When you claim your military is 980K strong and lost only 35k you don’t need to kidnapp people nor mobilizations.
To me it seems that the Russians are way more careful with the lives of their soldiers than it is reported or how Ukrainian treat their soldiers.
Never forget.